From Malaysiakini
If she was not privy to the documents, then why was she roped in in the first place? Doesn’t this also show that some of our civil servants are being paid to be doing nothing productive?’
Court dismisses Anwar’s 2nd bid to strike out charge
Anonymous: The judge Mohamad Zabidin Mohd Diah can’t even be impartial, so how to pass judgment with integrity then? Whatever was stated in the affidavits of investigating officer Jude Blacious Pereira and DPP Mohd Hanafiah Zakaria, he accepted in totality without letting the defence team cross-examine them and DPP Farah Azlina Latif.
What would happen if these people put in affidavits which stated that ‘Anwar Ibrahim did not sodomise Saiful’? Would the judge accept that and dismiss the case? The judge should recuse himself from hearing the trial since he is no more impartial.
DannyLoHH: The charge is dubious, the trial is sneaky, evidences are secrets, the judge is seemed beholden, the witness is caught lying, the court is looking more kangaroo-ish, and now the prosecutor is sleeping with the witness. But the sham trial continues because this is not about justice and it is not about rule of law. This is about getting rid of Anwar Ibrahim before the next election.
Alexander Yuan Xjin Kai: If Zabidin were to give such an ridiculous answer in any other court outside Malaysia, he would have been ridiculed, demoted or even fired from his job. But no… “Farah has no access to vital prosecution documents”, he said. Then let me ask you something then – why was she there in the first place?
Bernard Phillips: I am trying really hard to understand how the judge could have come to this decision. Legally, it should be clear that when there is evidence that there is a possibility, however remote, that the DPP could have passed some information to Saiful, the ruling should be in Anwar’s favour.
And as a former government officer, I can point out to the judge that even some office boys have more access to classified documents than senior government officials. And in a ‘juicy’ case like this you can be sure that Faraz Azlina had much more.
Lastly, can the judge be really sure that Saiful was more interested in the documents rather then in Farah Azlina? Come on Your Honour, reflect on that.
Fi-sha: A mockery of justice at the expense of undermining our intelligence and morality. If she was not privy to the documents, then why was she roped in as part of the prosecuting team in the first place? From a different standpoint, this shows that some of our civil servants are being paid to be doing nothing productive. Continue reading ‘‘Why Was DPP Farah On The Case Anyway?’’
Komen Terkini