Klik sini untuk terus ke blog Sheikh Yusof Al Qaradawi http://www.qaradawi.net/component/content/article/5508.html
|
From ScotSman.com
THOUGH his innocence was never in question, the acquittal in the Anwar Ibrahim trial (full story, page 23) came as a surprise to those of us who have been closely following events in Malaysia.
In 1998, Anwar faced a similar ordeal, which landed him solitary confinement for 15 years. His real crime was launching a popular uprising against the rule of then prime minister, Mahathir Mohamed.
Viewed as a threat to the ruling party’s status quo, Anwar was sacked as deputy prime minister and finance minister, arrested and sentenced after a trial that was marred by political interference, falsification of evidence, blackmailing, coercion and torture of witnesses, harassment of defence lawyers, and refusal to admit witness testimony favourable to the accused.
Anwar’s current trial mimicked many of those irregularities and, therefore, left many of us expecting the worse in advance of today’s verdict.
In January last year I, along with my colleague Mehmet Celebi, penned a short report for the Obama administration on the background of the trial and why the United States must protest against this charade.? On examining all the evidence available to us and conducting a number of “off the record” interviews, it became very clear to us very quickly that the entire basis of the current trial was questionable.
We therefore concluded that the continuation of this trial was a clear and present danger to democracy consolidation in a country regarded as being one of the only fully developed democracies in the Muslim world. An attribute that Dr Anwar himself could take credit for.
The comeback kid of Malaysian politics represents a rare breed in Muslim politics. He is political figure who traverses the lines of Muslim traditionalism and liberalism more effectively than almost anyone else on the global scene today.
In this year of the Arab Spring, a figure like Anwar, unburdened by the daily distraction of the trial, can be a potent and credible voice for reform in Malaysia and across the Muslim world.
• Dr Azeem Ibrahim is a fellow and member of the board of directors at the Institute of Social Policy. He is not related to Anwar Ibrahim
Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim said today the government was following in the footsteps of toppled Egyptian dictator Hosni Mubarak by barring protests from taking place on the streets and at least 20 other kinds of venues.
“The prohibition of places like kindergartens follows Hosni Mubarak’s military rule,” the opposition leader said when debating the Bill that has been criticised by several quarters as being more repressive than existing regulations.
Mubarak’s 30-year presidency came to an end in February this year after hundreds of thousands of Egyptians gathered to demand his exit.
The PKR de facto leader was replying to his colleague and Kuala Kedah MP Ahmad Kassim who asked “what is the meaning” of the long list of prohibited areas.
The Bill prohibits assemblies from being held at dams, reservoirs, water catchment areas, water treatment plants, electricity generating stations, petrol stations, hospitals, fire stations, airports, railways, land public transport terminals, ports, canals, docks, wharves, piers, bridges, marinas, places of worship and kindergartens and schools.
Anwar questioned how the government intended to “become the best democracy in the world” when it was “making it more difficult to gather than in Zimbabwe and Myanmar.”
He was referring to Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s statement just days after his September 15 pledge of democratic reforms, including repealing the controversial Internal Security Act (ISA), that the move was to make Malaysia the world’s best democracy.
But critics have said that the proposed law is more repressive than those in countries like Myanmar, which has one of the world’s poorest human rights records.
Myanmar’s military-dominated Parliament passed a law last week allowing street protests and a notice period of just five days, fewer than the 10 days required by the Peaceful Assembly Bill.
“The new law is even more repressive than Section 27 of the Police Act. Powers held by the police and the minister have not changed, only the timeframe for them to act,” the Permatang Pauh MP said, referring to the provision that requires a police permit for all public gatherings.
Pakatan Rakyat (PR) has called for the Bill to be withdrawn and put before a parliamentary select committee.
Syarikat penerbitan London, FBC Media yang diupah kerajaan Malaysia pimpinan Datuk Seri Najib Razak, didapati pernah bekerja untuk rejim bekas Presiden Mesir, Hosni Mubarak.
Mubarak yang berkuasa di Mesir selama 30 tahun digulingkan menerusi revolusi pada 25 Januari lalu, menyaksikan jutaan rakyat Mesir turun ke jalan raya selama 18 hari.
Perkara itu disahkan akhbar The Independent UK dalam laporan mengenai Perbadanan Penyiaran British (BBC) yang turut membeli program terbitan FBC Media.
“The Independent mendapati FBC pernah bekerja dengan rejim bekas Presiden Mesir, Hosni Mubarak,” kata akhbar itu dalam rencana mereka berjudul “Skandal program ‘murah’ BBC terdedah.”
Menurut akhbar itu, BBC kini berhadapan siasatan badan penyelaras penyiaran di UK, Offcom di atas penyiaran 15 program editorial yang hanya menelan “kos yang kecil”.
Lapan daripada 15 program yang diperolehi BBC itu datangnya daripada FBC Media, yang menerima bayaran 17juta pound daripada pentadbiran Najib untuk memperbaiki imej pentadbirannya di peringkat antarabangsa.
FBC dilaporkan menghasilkan tujuh program untuk BBC di Malaysia, empat daripadanya untuk siri “Develop or Die”.
BBC kini dilaporkan bertindak menamatkan kontrak mereka dengan FBC.
“Berkenaan FBC, kami dengan segera menggantung penyiaran program dari FBC apabila sedar tentang isu ini dan FBC sendiri kemudiannya mengaku yang ia bekerja untuk kerajaan Malaysia,” kata jurucakap BBC seperti dilaporkan The Independent.
Sebelum ini kerajaan mengaku melantik FBC Media sebagai konsultan untuk menaikkan imej Malaysia dan juga Perdana Menteri di peringkat antarabangsa.
Kontrak selama setahun itu disambung sebanyak dua kali dan tamat pada 2010 dengan kos perbelanjaan selama tiga tahun sebanyak Euro 19.6 juta (RM84 juta).
Akhbar The Star hari ini melaporkan bahawa Datuk Seri Mohamed Khaled Norden, Menteri Pengajian Tinggi bahawa beliau akan merujuk kepada Kabinet sama ada untuk membuat rayuan atau tidak terhadap keputusan Mahkamah Tinggi baru-baru ini yang mengumumkan satu seksyen Akta Universiti dan Kolej Universiti 1971 (AUKU) sebagai tidak sejajar dengan Perlembagaan Persekutuan.
Khaled dilaporkan berkata:
“Objektif utama pendidikan ialah untuk menggalakkan pelajar berfikir secara konstruktif dan kritis tanpa sebarang sekatan.
“Atas sebab itulah kami merasakan tidak wajar membenarkan pelajar menyertai parti-parti politik. Sekiranya pelajar memegang jawatan dalam sesebuah parti, mereka terikat kepada ideologi parti tersebut.
“Dengan menurut pendirian parti, pelajar tersebut akan hanya mempunyai pandangan orang lain bukan dirinya…
“Sekiranya kita benar-benar mahu memberikan keutamaan kepada kebebasan berpersatuan dan bukan pelajaran, saya tiada masalah.”
Kenyataan Khaled sendiri tidak masuk akal. Bagaimanakah tindakan menghalang pelajar menyertai parti politik membolehkan mereka berfikir secara kritis tanpa sebarang sekatan? Banyak universiti berprestij dunia tidak mempunyai sekatan tersebut namun kerajaan kita menghantar pelajar-pelajar terbaik negara ke universiti-universiti tersebut.
Apatah lagi, beliau seolah-olah terlupa bahawa ada segelintir kecil individu di dalam partinya sendiri yang ada pandangan mereka sendiri termasuk mengenai AUKU. Adakah beliau terlupa tentang Timbalan Menterinya sendiri, Dato Saifuddin Abdullah yang juga Ahli Majlis Tertinggi UMNO?
Kerajaan tidak patut membuat rayuan terhadap keputusan Mahkamah Tinggi ini untuk membenarkan pelajar-pelajar hak yang telah dinafikan sekian lama. Akta inilah yang menyumbang terhadap sekatan pemikiran konstruktif dan kritis yang Khaled nyatakan sebagai matlamat pendidikan.
NIK NAZMI NIK AHMAD
Pengarah Komunikasi
Parti Keadilan Rakyat
=======
Continue reading ‘Kenyataan Khaled Norden Tentang Auku Tak Masuk Akal’
nota Admin:
Ulasan berhubung peristiwa rempuhan pesawat keatas WTC pada 11 September ini telah dinukilkan oleh Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim dan telah diterbitkan oleh Time Magazine pada 15 Oktober 2001.
From Time Magazine
By Anwar Ibrahim
Never in Islam’s history have the actions of so few of its followers caused the religion and its community of believers to be such an abomination in the eyes of others. Millions of Muslims who fled to North America and Europe to escape poverty and persecution at home have become the objects of hatred and are now profiled as potential terrorists. The nascent democratic movements in Muslim countries will regress for a few decades as ruling autocrats use their participation in the global war against terrorism to terrorize their critics and dissenters.
This is what Mohamed Atta and his fellow terrorists and sponsors have done to Islam and its community worldwide by their murder of innocents at the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. The attacks must be condemned, and the condemnation must be without reservation. The foremost religious authorities are outraged and have issued statements denouncing the monstrous murders. All efforts to punish the perpetrators must be supported.
One is therefore perturbed by the confusion among Muslims who responded to the attack with a misplaced diatribe against the U.S. In Malaysia, the government-controlled media have been deployed to stir up anti-American sentiments, while members of the political Elite use a different language for international diplomacy. Certainly there are legitimate grievances against the U.S. and good reason for despondency over the fate of the Palestinians, who now face an even more arrogant Israel. But this is not the time for sermonizing or moralizing over U.S. foreign policy. Had we Malaysians been the victims of such a tragedy, we would find such hectoring tasteless and repulsive.
One wonders how, in the 21st century, the Muslim world could have produced an Osama bin Laden. In the centuries when Islam forged civilizations, men of wealth created pious foundations supporting universities and hospitals, and princes competed with one another to patronize scientists, philosophers and men of letters. The greatest of scientists and philosophers of the medieval age, ibn Sina, was a product of that system. But bin Laden uses his personal fortune to sponsor terror and murder, not learning or creativity, and to wreak destruction rather than promote creation.
Bin Laden and his proteges are the children of desperation; they come from countries where political struggle through peaceful means is futile. In many Muslim countries, political dissent is simply illegal. Yet, year by year, the size of the educated class and the number of young professionals continue to increase. These people need space to express their political and social concerns. But state control is total, leaving no room for civil society to grow.
The need for Muslim societies to address their internal social and political development has become more urgent than ever. Economic development alone is clearly insufficient: it creates its own tensions in the social and political spheres, which must be addressed. A proper orientation must be developed for Muslim engagement with the world at large. Participation in the global processes must not be the monopoly of the government.
It is the sense of alienation and the perception that the world is against them that nurture bitterness among those who resort to terrorism. Confusion and anger against the global order and its only superpower have been brought about by the failure of the Muslim world to address two crucial issues: Afghanistan’s descent into chaos and anarchy as a result of the Soviet invasion and the subsequent rise of the Taliban, and the suffering inflicted on the Muslim masses in Iraq by its dictator as well as by sanctions imposed on that long-suffering nation.
For ethical reasons, Muslims will support the global initiative against terrorism. But there is a growing perception that autocrats of all types will seize the opportunity to prop up their regimes and deal a severe blow to democratic movements. Russian President Vladimir Putin will use it to defend atrocities in Chechnya, Israel to defend its intransigence and Malaysia its detentions without trial.
Necessity will prompt the U.S. to seek the collaboration of the governments of Muslim countries. This is understandable. But they do not hold all the answers to terrorism. The growth of democracy, political participation and civil society is the final answer. By softening its endorsement of the struggle for democracy and the protection of human rights, the U.S. will inadvertently strengthen dictatorial regimes, thus replicating past associations with Marcos, Suharto and the Shah of Iran.
For more than 100 years, the Muslim world has had to grapple with the problem of modernity. Of greatest urgency is the effort to inculcate an intellectual and political orientation that promotes democracy and openness. Intellectuals and politicians must have the courage to condemn fanaticism in all its forms. But they must, in the same breath, equally condemn the tyrants and oppressive regimes that dash every hope of peaceful change.
Harakah
Oleh Subky Latif
SAYA terharu membaca laporan rombongan misi kemanusiaan ke Gaza dan rintihan Ketua Pemuda UMNO Khairy Jamaluddin yang terkandas di perairan Greece.
Bukan saja rombongan pelayaran Freedom Flottila 11 dihalang untuk datang ke Gaza, maka kapal-kapal konvoi yang berlabuh di perairan Greece tidak benarkan oleh kerajaannya meninggalkan pelabuhan mereka.
Ada kapal yang cuba meninggalkan perairan itu tanpa izin kerajan Athen tetapi ia telah dipaksa pulang ke pelabuhan transitnya.
Rombongan itu mendesak sokongan antarabangsa supaya menekan Greece membenarkan mereka meninggalkan perairannya bagi menuju Gaza, tetapi Greece bertindak tegas tidak membenarkannya.
Reaksi Greece itu adalah atas larangan regim Israil dan apa lagi Amerika adalah menyebalahi Israil. Walau pun Setiausaha Agung Bangsa-Bangsa Bersatu menyokong rombongan kemanusiaan itu, tetapi apabila Amerika mmihak kepada Israil adalah sukar bagi Greece yang berdepan dengan krisis hutang sekarang menimbangkan pemergian rombongan Freedom Flottila itu. Continue reading ‘Nasib Flotilla II Sama Dengan Bersih 2.0′
Tensions mount as hundreds of thousands of activists expected in capital for Arab spring-style rally against ‘dirty politics’
Malaysia is bracing for an Arab spring-style stand-off on Saturday, when activists angry at “dirty politics” are expected to rally in Kuala Lumpur despite draconian government efforts to nip the movement in the bud.
Tensions have mounted in this normally staid state, often called “Moderate Malaysia”, after a group of 62 non-governmental organisations known locally as Bersih 2.0 proposed a peaceful protest, dubbed the “Walk for Democracy”, against alleged vote-rigging and other electoral abuses in a recent state election.
But the government last week declared Bersih – which means “clean” in Malay – illegal, and has warned that anyone wearing the yellow colours of protest will be detained. It has already arrested more than 200 supporters and organisers on charges ranging from the promotion of “illegal assembly” to “waging war against the king”. Some are being held for an indefinite period without trial.
Although Malaysia’s next general election is not until 2013, polls could take place as soon as this year – with many speculating that the incumbent Barisan Nasional (National Front) may not fare so well.
Headed by the prime minister, Najib Razak, Barisan Nasional has ruled Malaysia since 1955. It suffered a major setback in 2008 when it lost more than one-third of its parliamentary seats to Pakatan Rakyat (People’s Alliance), a coalition of opposition parties.
Despite government accusations that they are actively threatening national security, Bersih’s leaders have been adamant that they are pushing solely for electoral changes.
“We are calling for a government through free and fair elections, not street demonstrations” like in Egypt or Libya, said Bersih’s chairwoman, Ambiga Sreenevasan.
After calling Bersih illegal, the government assented to a rally in a stadium. Opposition groups expect as many as 300,000 supporters to turn out. Police, however, have refused to grant Bersih a permit for the rally – a requirement for any gathering of five or more people – and have said they will work with the army to disperse Saturday’s crowds.
Earlier this week police held a military exercise in which soldiers held up banners reading “Disperse or we will shoot”.
Najib threw his endorsement behind local silat – or martial arts – groups, including one that has openly vowed to “wage war” against Bersih. “If there are evil enemies who want to attack the country from without and within,” Najib said this week, “you, my brothers, will rise to fight them”.
Bersih organisers say they have received death, bomb and gang-rape threats in recent weeks, which they claim police have not investigated.
“It has been challenging personally,” said Ambiga. Nonetheless, Bersih “understand our responsibility in holding the line on behalf of all of you who want nothing more than a clean electoral system and a better Malaysia.”
While no one is entirely sure what to expect on Saturday, the lead-up has already caused mayhem. Extensive roadblocks have caused near standstills in Kuala Lumpur and many businesses will be closing. Widespread mobile phone and internet disruption is expected.
Despite it being a supposedly peaceful protest, many are expecting violence.
“This is the formula now, all around the world – in Libya, Egypt, it’s all the same – there will be violence,” said Mohamed Rayak, 32, a hotel manager. “But no one knows if it will be coming from the government or the opposition. If it’s from the government, then they can say it all got out of hand, and [the rally] has to be stopped.”
Thousands of supporters have aired their views on Facebook and Twitter, with many of them, such as Thomas Chai, tweeting directly to the prime minister. “Beneath this YELLOW there is an idea, Mr Najib, and ideas are bulletproof,” he wrote.
Bersih supporters in other parts of the world are expected to hold similar rallies on Saturday in Taiwan, Korea, Japan, Hong Kong, Australia, New Zealand, France, Switzerland, the US, Canada and the UK.
Recent Comments