Archive for January, 2011



26
Jan

Program Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim Tawan DUN Tenang

27 Januari 2011 (Khamis)

1) 7.30 – 11.00 Malam – Jamuan Makan Malam Bersama Masyarakat Tionghua

Lokasi – Restoran G&D, Labis

Penceramah:
1. YB Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim
2. YB Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin
3. YBhg Dato’ Seri Chua Jui Meng
4. YB Tien Chua
5. YB Nga Kor Meng
6. Calon (Pn Normala Sudirman) Continue reading ‘Program Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim Tawan DUN Tenang’

26
Jan

Lee Kuan Yew Urges Muslims to ‘Be Less Strict’

The views of Mr. Lee Kuan Yew about Islam (Bangkok Post, 24 January 2011) do not hold water. The history and reality of the presence of multiculturalism and multiracialism in the Muslim world belies such views. The Jews and religious other communities were much accommodated in the Muslim Spain and other parts of the Muslim world when they were persecuted in the West. Continue reading ‘Lee Kuan Yew Urges Muslims to ‘Be Less Strict’’

26
Jan

Tunisia and the Arab Street As protests spread to Egypt, democrats need American support

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704881304576094030258360412.html?mod=WSJ_newsreel_opinion

Tunisia’s Jasmine Revolution began last month with the lonely demonstration of a frustrated vendor immolating himself on the street. Could Tunisia’s demonstration now spread elsewhere in an Arab world dominated by autocrats?

The question isn’t so outlandish after yesterday’s protests in Egypt, where thousands calling for the end of President Hosni Mubarak’s 30-year rule clashed with security forces across the country. At least three people were killed.

The Mubarak government is far more willful than was the tired and corrupt regime of ousted Tunisian President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali. Egypt’s military is also larger and more closely integrated into the government than is Tunisia’s army, which refused to act against the protestors and now seems to be supporting elections. The military essentially installed Mr. Mubarak, a former air force officer, and his predecessor Anwar Sadat. A comparable overthrow in Cairo must be counted as unlikely.

Yet the Tunisian example does seem to have broken a psychological taboo in the famous Arab street. Arabs are typically allowed to demonstrate against America, but not against their own governments. The sight of Tunisia becoming the first Arab revolution born in the streets is liberating to other Arabs with access to Al Jazeera but little civic space or chance for democratic expression in their own countries.

This is all the more reason for America to help Tunisia succeed, especially since so much can still go wrong. Mr. Ben Ali’s sudden departure for Saudi Arabia left a vacuum no politician or party can easily fill. A couple of his cronies claimed the throne and stepped down. The cabinet includes figures from the opposition and the ruling party, who met for the first time Thursday and presented a unified front. An interim government needs to gain legitimacy to pave the way for presidential elections promised in six months.

That transition may be harder to pull off in Tunisia than it was in other popular revolutions, such as the 1986 People Power in the Philippines or Ukraine’s 2004 Orange Revolution. Those regimes were toppled after trying to steal contested elections, and opposition parties led by charismatic figures were ready to take power. Tunisia’s leaderless uprising reflected public frustration rather than faith in a democratic choice.

A fair election in the summer would nonetheless be a historic step toward representative government and a teachable moment for people who have only known strongmen. The military is playing a helpful role for now, even as Islamists of various stripes look for openings to exploit. If the civilians flounder, the generals might yet step in, which would be a failure of the uprising’s aspirations.

Tunisia’s new leaders declared an amnesty for political prisoners and legalized all political groups, including the main Islamist party Ennahdha, or Renaissance. This looks like an acceptable risk. Mr. Ben Ali banned Ennahdha in 1992, sending its leader, Rachid Ghannouchi, into London exile. The party is said to be the best-organized opposition force in Tunisia today. But Tunisia is broadly secular, urban, middle class and educated, not usually fertile ground for radical Islam.

Ultimately, political and economic pluralism and durable institutions are the best defense against tyrants, secular or religious. As tempting as it is to prefer the autocrat you know over the Islamist you fear, the U.S. won’t often have the luxury of a choice. So what really matters is that whoever takes power in a fair election can’t easily deny others the same privilege.

We’ve tried the alternative for decades. America’s support for Arab tyrants made us accessories to unpopular rulers and played into Islamist hands. Denying people the right to choose their leaders, often in the name of preventing the rise of Islamist parties, often boosts support for those same Islamists as the only alternative to the corrupt powers in charge.

Not all street uprisings against tyranny succeed, and even fewer midwife democracy. The aspirations of the 2009 “green revolution” were crushed in Iran; China’s democrats haven’t recovered from Tiananmen Square. Yet these cases show that the thirst for liberty transcends geography, religion and political culture. The U.S. should let the Arabs know it is on the side of political freedom.

26
Jan

Will Tunisia Be the First Domino?

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703555804576102343246718046.html

In Egypt, too, protestors are laying waste to the mistaken notion that Arabs and Muslims are politically passive.

By ANWAR IBRAHIM

Tunisians earlier this month forced their president out of office, marking the first popular revolution in an Arab country in modern history. The swiftness with which it came about should send a clear message to other autocracies and dictatorships in the Muslim world.

The longevity of such regimes comes from their ability to suppress dissent with state-controlled organs, particularly the military. What Tunisia’s example demonstrates is that when one of these organs malfunctions—as the security forces did when they failed to mobilize effectively—others, like the media and the judiciary, can fall rapidly as well.

Could this be a Berlin Wall moment for the Middle East? Will other Arab states that employ the same modus operandi of political oppression also fall?

In a 2005 address at the U.S.- Islamic World Forum in Doha, I argued that democratization would come to the Middle East sooner than most projected, and I criticized what I consider to be the U.S.’s “policy of selective ambivalence.” While the Bush administration extolled the virtue of freedom in waging its war on terror, the U.S. remained closely allied with various countries that use blatantly repressive policies to stamp out civil society and subvert democracy.

This ambivalence has not dissipated under the Obama administration. Despite Mr. Obama’s historic speech in Cairo, where he specifically extolled representative government, this White House continues to work closely with a range of Middle Eastern autocrats. From the perspective of democrats in the region, this is because democratization will likely yield governments that tend to be less responsive to U.S. demands—particularly those governments regarded as Islamist.

Consider Tunisia. Zine El Abidine Ben Ali would not have remained in power for 25 years had it not been for American support. The fact that this kleptocratic regime finally fell is a stark reminder that government built on the suppression of its citizens is temporary. We saw this in Iran in 1979 with the dramatic downfall of the Shah, and also in 1998 when Indonesians peacefully transitioned to democracy after three decades of military rule.

The problems that plague the Arab world remain overwhelming: the concentration of wealth and power by the few over the many, poor infrastructure, primitive education systems, minimal health care, and decreasing incomes in the face of rising food prices and cost of living. Corruption and nepotism reign in the complete absence of accountability and transparency.

It is a perfect recipe for political upheaval: political marginalization and economic impoverishment for the people and ill-gotten wealth for the ruling elite. It’s a reality that can’t be cloaked by propaganda—citizens can see the reality on YouTube and Facebook—though the leaders certainly try. Indeed, no Arab leader has owned up to any of these evils, other than by offering pious platitudes about improving the economic lot of their people.

It would be foolhardy for governments in the region to regard Tunisia as an isolated case. The economic and political grievances that spawned the revolution are not unique to that country. One need only walk the streets of Cairo and Karachi, or roam the back lands in Algeria and Afghanistan, to see how grinding poverty and oppression can crush a person’s dignity.

Autocratic rulers accustomed to permanent sovereignty might consider changing their mindset. The Tunisian uprising was driven by a desire for freedom and justice, not by any particular ideology. The bogeyman of Islamism, the oft-cited scapegoat of Middle Eastern dictators to justify their tyranny, must therefore be reconsidered or junked altogether. The U.S., too, should learn a lesson about the myth that secular tyrants and dictators are its best bet against Islamists. Revolutions, be they secular or religious, are born of a universal desire for autonomy. The common thread that binds the Iranian revolution and the Tunisian upheaval is the rising discontent of the people after years of suffering under oppressive rule.

Could Tunisia’s revolution turn this winter of Arab discontent into a spring for Middle Eastern freedom? As Tunisia moves into the league of Middle Eastern democracies along with countries such as Turkey, for much of the rest of the Muslim world democracy remains elusive. Opposition groups in countries like Egypt have found a beacon of hope in Tunisians’ struggle. Demonstrations in Cairo and throughout the region lay waste to the mistaken notion that Arab and Muslims are politically passive and prone to authoritarianism. But will they be given a fair chance? The Palestinians chose their own leaders through the ballot box, but the West changed the rules of engagement midway through the game.

The fundamental lesson is clear: The U.S. must stop supporting tyrants and autocrats whether in the Middle East, Pakistan or Southeast Asia. Let this be a new dawn for democracy in the Arab and Muslim world.

Mr. Ibrahim, a former deputy prime minister of Malaysia, is a member of parliament for the Justice Party and leader of the opposition.

25
Jan

Bersalaman: PKPIM Pertahan Tindakan Cikgu Mala

Dari Harakah

Isu salam antara lelaki dan perempuan yang bukan muhrim timbul mungkin disebabkan kegagalan Umno sendiri menjelaskan norma-norma Islam kepada orang bukan Islam.

Menurut Presiden Persatuan Kebangsaan Pelajar Islam Malaysia (PKPIM), Faizal Abdul Aziz, mungkin Umno tidak pernah mengamalkan norma-norma tersebut menyebabkan bukan Islam menjadi keliru.

Beliau berpendapat isu tersebut sepatutnya tidak perlu dipolitikkan dalam kempen pilihan raya kecil Dewan Undangan Negeri (Dun) Tenang.

Ini kerana, tindakan calon PAS, Normala Sudirman enggan bersalam dengan lelaki, satu masej yang baik kerana Islam melarang bersentuhan antara lelaki dan perempuan kecuali muhrimnya. Continue reading ‘Bersalaman: PKPIM Pertahan Tindakan Cikgu Mala’

25
Jan

Stop Calling Each Other Treasonous

From Malaysiakini

PKR de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim has rejected the ongoing ‘contest’ between BN and Pakatan Rakyat to label the other as treasonous.

“I agree with you (that this is regressive politics) and I do not share the view (of taking up that sort of argument),” he said today in Shah Alam.

“The issue debated was that of the (Selangor) constitution and the position of the rulers, so we should emphasis on whether this amendment will strengthen or weaken the spirit of the constitution.”

However, he said, he could not blame his Pakatan colleagues for taking up this argument as the label was first hurled by Umno.

“Umno called us treasonous, traitors to Malays and lackeys to the Chinese so (Pakatan leaders) were influenced to sometimes answer with the same language. But if it were me, I would suggest that they answer based on facts of the 1993 amendment and speeches according to the Hansard.

“The Umno leadership seems to be belittling the ability of the rulers to think for themselves, and I don’t think the rulers can be dragged in just like that.”
Asked if Pakatan would make another bid to return the power to appoint the state secretary, financial officer and legal advisor to the sultan as per the pre-1993 Selangor constitution, Anwar said: “Our position … is that we respect their (the rulers’) position as guaranteed and enshrined in the constitution, as we are a constitutional monarchy.

“The power and the authority rests with the people, the mandate is given by the people… (but) there is point having the rulers if they are not consulted as per the 1993 amendment.”

Interestingly, Anwar admitted that, in 1993, he had headed Umno’s delegation to negotiate with then Agong Sultan Azlan Shah who represented the Council of Rulers on the matter.

“I know what happened and I don’t think the Rulers forgot their experience, it’s recent history,” he said.

On another issue, he renewed his call to Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak to debate on the economy, particularly on Pakatan’s 100-day reform plan.

However, he said, if the PM insists on attacking him on a personal level, he is willing to take him on.

“He doesn’t reject my call (for the debate) but he says I will fall sick, or talks about londeh (slipping down the pants)…I don’t want to entertain these personal issues, I want to talk about the economy.

“But if he insists, I am ready, even the sodomy case. I can answer and I want to bring up the issue of graft, murder, stealing someone else’s wife, Port Dickson, all that can be brought up too.” Continue reading ‘Stop Calling Each Other Treasonous’

25
Jan

Perbetulkan Kemusnahan Institusi Demokrasi Di tangan UMNO

Dari Merdeka Review

Nota Perbahasan YB Azmin Ali

Tuan Speaker,

1. Saya ingin menyertai perbahasan Rang Undang-Undang bernama Suatu Enakmen untuk meminda Undang-Undang Tubuh Kerajaan Selangor 1959 yang dibentangkan oleh Menteri Besar sebentar tadi.

2. Rang Undang-Undang ini adalah amat penting untuk:

i. Memperjelaskan sistem pemerintahan di negara ini yang berpaksikan sistem Demokrasi Berparlimen (Parliamentary Democracy) dan Raja Berperlembagaan (Constitutional Monarchy);

ii. Mengembalikan kuasa Pemerintah dan Menteri Besar dalam perlantikan di bawah Perkara 52 di dalam Bab 3 untuk menjamin wujudnya proses timbang tara (check and balance) dan kemurniaan peranan di antara institusi Raja dan Ketua Kerajaan Negeri yang dipilih oleh rakyat;

iii. Menyuntik kekuatan baru kepada sistem Persekutuan atau Federalisme;

iv. Menjamin keberkesanan perjalanan pentadbiran Kerajaan Negeri Selangor yang dipilih oleh rakyat.

3. Alhamdulillah, hari ini Dewan Negeri Selangor melakar sejarah apabila Kerajaan Negeri Pakatan Rakyat membuat pembentangan bagi mengemukakan pindaan terhadap Undang-Undang Tubuh Kerajaan Selangor 1959 khususnya pada Perkara 52 (1) berkaitan dengan perlantikan Setiausaha Kerajaan, Penasihat Undang-Undang Negeri dan Pegawai Kewangan Negeri.  Usaha yang dipimpin oleh Pakatan Rakyat adalah untuk mengembalikan prosedur untuk perlantikan ini seperti mana yang diperuntukkan di bawah Perlembagaan Negeri yang sama yang mana peruntukan ini telah dimansuhkan dalamn tahun 1993 oleh makhluk perosak bernama UMNO. Continue reading ‘Perbetulkan Kemusnahan Institusi Demokrasi Di tangan UMNO’

24
Jan

Pakatan Rakyat Menyokong Pindaan Mengembalikan Kuasa Sultan, BN Menolak

KENYATAAN AKHBAR
24 JANUARI 2011

Saya ingin menekankan di sini bahawa sidang Dewan Negeri Selangor yang diadakan hari ini bukan sidang tergempar. Mesyuarat ini diadakan di bawah Peraturan 10(3) Peraturan-peraturan Tetap Undang-undang Tubuh Negeri Selangor untuk membincangkan perkara-perkara spesifik, mendesak dan berkepentingan awam. Hari ini Dewan membincangkan pelantikan Setiausaha Kerajaan Negeri yang melibatkan kepentingan awam.

Saya mengambil kesempatan ini untuk mengucapkan terima kasih kepada Tuan Speaker, Dato Teng Chang Kim dan kakitangan Dewan Negeri kerana berjaya menganjurkan mesyuarat hari ini. Kebijaksanaan dan pendekatan profesional Tuan Speaker telah membimbing satu pembentangan usul yang sihat dan bermanfaat.

Hari ini Kerajaan Pakatan Rakyat Negeri Selangor telah mencipta sejarah apabila semua wakil rakyat Pakatan Rakyat bersatu menyokong cadangan pindaan Undang-undang Tubuh Kerajaan Selangor bagi mengembalikan kuasa DYMM Sultan dan Menteri Besar dalam pelantikan tiga pegawai ex-officio yang telah dimansuhkan selepas pindaan Perlembagaan 1993.

Dalam pada itu, semua wakil Kerajaan memberi perbahasan baik dan bernas berkenaan satu isu begitu penting kepada rakyat yang gagal disentuh oleh pentadbiran sebelum ini. Perbahasan Pakatan Rakyat hari telah berjaya memartabatkan kesucian Dewan Negeri Selangor dan Eksekutif.

Ini selari dengan keinginan rakyat Negeri Selangor yang mahukan satu pentadbiran professional bagi dua institusi tertinggi – Dewan dan Eksekutif – yang tidak diamalkan di peringkat Persekutuan.

Dari asas ini, usul hari ini adalah untuk meminda Fasal 52(1) Undang-Undang Tubuh Negeri Selangor supaya satu prosedur dibuat bagi pelantikan tiga pegawai ex-officio demi memastikan dasar-dasar kerajaan negeri dapat dilaksanakan dengan cekap dan sempurna.

Kami kesal dengan keputusan wakil-wakil Umno/Barisan Nasional untuk menolak usul ini. Lebih kesal lagi, Barisan Nasional gagal memberikan hujah-hujah yang konkrit dan berkualiti untuk menolak cadangan pindaan ini. Tiada satu pun soalan atau hujah yang kami kemukakan dijawab dengan baik dan professional.

Jelas, penolakan ini dibuat atas nama politik dan kesetiaan mereka kepada pihak-pihak yang berkuasa di Putrajaya. Sepatutnya sebagai wakil rakyat, keputusan mereka perlulah berdasarkan kepentingan rakyat.

Penolakan usul juga membuktikan bahawa Umno yang sebenarnya tidak menghormati sama sekali institusi Raja-raja Melayu dan tetap menghalang Raja-raja Melayu daripada memainkan peranan yang sepatutnya dalam institusi Raja Berperlembagaan.

Sikap hipokrit pihak Umno kini jelas ternampak dalam rekod mereka yang secara konsisten menafikan kuasa Raja-raja Melayu, terutamanya pada tahun 1983, 1993 dan kini, 2011.

Sidang Dewan hari ini membuktikan pemimpin Umno sebenarnya tidak layak untuk menyentuh soal kedaulatan Raja-Raja kerana belang mereka telah terbongkar. Mereka menuduh Pakatan Rakyat tidak menghormati peranan Raja-raja tetapi sebenarnya Umno yang menghakis kuasa Raja-raja melalui pindaan-pindaan Perlembagaan yang telah dilakukan.

Walaupun kita mungkin tidak berjaya untuk membuat pindaan, majoriti ahli Dewan telah menyokong. Ini tidak akan mematahkan semangat Pakatan Rakyat. Malah, isu ini telah menguatkan lagi tekad Pakatan Rakyat untuk membuktikan kewibawaan kami dan memperolehi majoriti dua pertiga dalam pilihan raya kelak supaya pindaan ini dapat dibangkitkan semula.

Kami masih berpendirian bahawa DYMM Sultan Selangor dan Kerajaan Negeri berhak untuk memainkan peranan dalam pemilihan 3 pegawai ex-officio demi memastikan dasar-dasar kerajaan negeri dapat dilaksanakan dengan sempurna.

Walaupun pihak Persekutuan nampaknya terus mengenepikan suara rakyat Selangor dan enggan menghormati semangat federalisme atau bertemu setengah jalan, Kerajaan Negeri akan berusaha untuk memastikan pentadbiran negeri akan terus dijalankan dengan baik dan selancar mungkin demi kebajikan rakyat Selangor.

Bersama menjunjung amanah yang diberi oleh rakyat, Kerajaan Pakatan Rakyat akan terus menggandakan usaha untuk melaksanakan tugas dan meneruskan agenda “Merakyatkan Ekonomi Selangor” yang memperjuangkan kebajikan dan kesejahteraan rakyat.

TAN SRI DATO SERI ABDUL KHALID IBRAHIM
DATO’ MENTERI BESAR SELANGOR

24
Jan

Luncheon Talk Bersama Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim

LUNCHEON TALK BERSAMA YB DATO’ SERI ANWAR IBRAHIM, PENASIHAT EKONOMI NEGERI SELANGOR

Tajuk: SUBSIDI: BEBANAN NEGARA ATAU BEBANAN RAKYAT?

Tarikh: 25 Januari 2010

Masa: 11.30 pagi – 2.00 petang

Tempat: Kelab Shah Alam, Jalan Akuatik, Seksyen 13, 40100 Shah Alam, Selangor

Ahli Panel: Y.Bhg. Dr. Zakariah Abdul Rashid, Pengarah Eksekutif, Malaysia Institute of Economic Research (MIER)

Kit media akan diedarkan kepada sdr/sdri sebaik sebelum majlis bermula.

Pejabat Penasihat Ekonomi Selangor

24
Jan

Ucapan Khas Buat “Sang Raja Kg. Baru

Dari Blog Dr.LO’LO’

Ucapan ini ditujukan khas kepada Menteri Wilayah Persekutuan dan Kesejahteraan Bandar, Dato’ Raja Nong Chik Bin Dato’ Raja Zainal Abidin kerana akan ditabalkan menjadi “RAJA KAMPONG BHARU” pada Mac 2011 nanti.

Untuk menjadi “RAJA KAMPONG BHARU” tidak susah, hanya perlu bentangkan dan luluskan Rang Undang-undang Perbadanan Pembangunan Kampong Baru 2010 (RUU PPKB 2010) sahaja. Justeru Dato’ Raja Nong Chik pada 17 Disember 2010 yang lalu telah membentangkan untuk bacaan kali pertama RUU tersebut di Dewan Rakyat. Dalam kegawatan Negara dan pimpinan Melayu menghebohkan Ketuanan Melayu dan Kedaulatan Raja-Raja Melayu maka tindakan ini harus dipuji kerana akan menambah seorang lagi Raja Melayu khas bagi penduduk Kampong Bharu. TAHNIAH sekali lagi. Continue reading ‘Ucapan Khas Buat “Sang Raja Kg. Baru’

24
Jan

Najib Diajak Berdiskusi, Jika Takut Debat

Dari Malaysiakini

Naib Presiden PAS Salahudin Ayub berkata pilihan raya kecil DUN Tenang merupakan pentas terbaik untuk Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak berdebat dengan ketua Umum PKR, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim mengenai program 100 hari sekiranya menawan Putrajaya.

Menyifatkan debat itu sebagai “Debat Agung”, Salahudin berkata Najib tidak wajar menolak cabaran tersebut sekiranya beliau “konsisten, berani dan tidak berdolak-dalik dalam komitmen beliau untuk menyaksikan rakyat diberikan maklumat dan informasi yang telus”. Continue reading ‘Najib Diajak Berdiskusi, Jika Takut Debat’

24
Jan

How Corporate America Is Pushing Us All Off a Cliff (APCO)

From Global Research
By Michael Moore

When someone talks about pushing you off a cliff, it’s just human nature to be curious about them. Who are these people, you wonder, and why would they want to do such a thing?

That’s what I was thinking when corporate whistleblower Wendell Potter revealed that, when “Sicko” was being released in 2007, the health insurance industry’s PR firm, APCO Worldwide, discussed their Plan B: “Pushing Michael Moore off a cliff.”

But after looking into it, it turns out it’s nothing personal! APCO wants to push everyone off a cliff.

APCO was hatched in 1984 as a subsidiary of the Washington, D.C. law firm Arnold & Porter — best known for its years of representing the giant tobacco conglomerate Philip Morris. APCO set up fake “grassroots” organizations around the country to do the bidding of Big Tobacco. All of a sudden, “normal, everyday, in-no-way-employed-by-Philip Morris Americans” were popping up everywhere. And it turned out they were outraged — outraged! — by exactly the things APCO’s clients hated (such as, the government telling tobacco companies what to do). In particular, they were “furious” that regular people had the right to sue big corporations…you know, like Philip Morris. (For details, see the 2000 report “The CALA Files” (PDF) by my friends and colleagues Carl Deal and Joanne Doroshow.)

Right about now you may be wondering: how many Americans get pushed off a cliff by Big Tobacco every year? The answer is 443,000 Americans die every year due to smoking. That’s a big cliff.

With this success under their belts, APCO created “The Advancement of Sound Science Coalition.” TASSC, funded partly by Exxon, had a leading role in a planned campaign by the fossil fuel industry to create doubt about global warming. The problem for Big Oil speaking out against global warming, according to the campaign’s own leaked documents, was that the public could see the “vested interest” that oil companies had in opposing environmental laws. APCO’s job was to help conceal those oil company interests.

And boy, have they ever succeeded. Polls now show that, as the world gets hotter, Americans are getting less and less worried about it.

How big is this particular cliff? According to the World Health Organization, climate change contributes — right now — to the deaths of 150,000 people every year. By 2030 it may be double that. And after that…well, the sky is literally the limit! I don’t think it’s crazy to say APCO may rack up even bigger numbers here than they have with tobacco.

With this track record, you can see why, when the health insurance industry wanted to come after “Sicko,” they went straight to APCO. The “worst case,” as their leaked documents say, was that “Sicko evolves into a sustained populist movement.” That simply could not be allowed to happen. Something obviously had to be done.

As Wendell Potter explains, APCO ran their standard playbook, setting up something called “Health Care America.” Health Care America, according to Potter, “was received by mainstream reporters, including the New York Times, as a legitimate organization when it was nothing but a front group set up by APCO Worldwide. It was not anything approaching what it was reporting to be: a ‘grassroots organization.’ It was a sham group.”

Health Care America showed up online in 2007 (the year “Sicko” was released) and disappeared quickly by early 2008. You can still find their website archived here. As you’ll see, their “moderated forum” allowed normal, everyday, in-no-way-employed-by-the-insurance-industry Americans to speak out. For instance, here’s something Nicole felt very strongly about:

“Moore shouldn’t be allowed to call his film a ‘documentary.’ It should be called a political commercial. We need to fix our health care system, but we shouldn’t accept a Hollywood moviemaker’s political views as the starting point.”

Here’s what Wendell Potter revealed about the insurance industry’s media strategy:

“As we would do the media training, we would always have someone refer to him as ‘Hollywood entertainer’ or ‘Hollywood moviemaker Michael Moore.’ They don’t want you to think that it was a documentary that had some truth.”

Thanks for your perspective, “Nicole”!

Now, how big was THAT cliff? A pretty good size — according to a recent study, 45,000 Americans die every year because they don’t have health insurance.

And here we are in 2010. A lesser PR firm might be resting on its laurels at this point, content to sit back and watch hundreds of thousands of people continue to be pushed off the various cliffs they’ve built. But not APCO! Right now they’ve taken on their biggest challenge yet: leading a giant, multi-million dollar effort to help Wall Street “earn back the trust of the American people.”

We may never know the size of this particular cliff. But we can be sure it’s gigantic. According to the New York Times, one of the things Wall Street’s recession gave us is “the crippling of the government program that provides life-sustaining antiretroviral drugs to Americans with H.I.V. or AIDS who cannot afford them.” Internationally, organizations fighting AIDS and other diseases are “hugely afraid” of cutbacks in funding.

Of course, there are the 101 ways recessions kill quietly. For instance, children’s hospitals are seeing a sharp 55% rise in the abuse of babies by parents.

And that’s just the previous cliff. If APCO and its Wall Street co-conspirators lull us into turning our backs on them again, we can be sure the next cliff — the next crash — will be much bigger.

Anyway, this is all just a way for me to say to APCO: No hard feelings! My getting mad at you would be like a chicken who’s still happily pecking away getting mad at McDonald’s. Compared to the millions you’ve already turned into McNuggets, you’ve actually treated me much, much BETTER! Spying on my family, planting smears and lies about me, privately badgering movie critics to give the film a poor review, scaring Americans into believing they’d be committing a near-act of treason were they to go to the theater and see my movie — hey, ya done good, health insurance companies of America. And, most important, you stopped the nation from getting true universal health care. Good job!

There’s only one problem — I’m not one of those “liberals” you fund in Congress, the ones who fear your power.

I’m me. And that, sadly, is not good for you.

Yours in good health,

Michael Moore

P.S. It seems to me that APCO’s discussion of pushing me off a cliff should legitimately be part of their Wikipedia page. And why not something about their role in Wall Street’s new PR offensive? So I’m asking everyone interested to write something up that meets Wikipedia’s guidelines and help bring the APCO Worldwide entry up to date. Post it somewhere online and send a tweet about it to @mmflint. I’ll award a signed copy of “Sicko” by noon Sunday to the best entry…and then deputize you to post it on Wikipedia for real and make sure APCO’s minions don’t take it down. Just be sure afterward not to walk near any cliffs!

P.P.S. The late, great comedian Bill Hicks had some thoughts about marketing and the people who do it.

Michael Moore is a frequent contributor to Global Research. Global Research Articles by Michael Moore