Suasana di Hotel de Palma petang semalam hening, menghimpunkan aktivis reformasi, penggerak lembaga kemasyarakatan dan barisan peguam saya sejak 1998.
Ikhtiar Pawancheek menyingkap semula secara teliti episod ngeri dan getir ketika itu amat menarik sekali. Beliau menukil dari adegan mahkamah, telatah hakim, dan suasana persekitaran serta reaksi masyarakat antarabangsa.
Pastinya catatan tersebut berharga sebagai dokumen sejarah dan lebih bererti sebagai pengajaran agar kezaliman dan kemusnahan badan kehakiman tidak berulang.
YM Raja Aziz Addruse petah mendedahkan krisis kehakiman 1988 dan keyakinan beliau sejak awal pengendalian kes saya pada 1998 bahawa sang penguasa sudah membuat ketetapan menghukum.
Sekali lagi – tahniah kpd Pawancheek, penerbit Gerakbudaya dan rakan-rakan. Keluarga Allahyarham Aris Chris Fernando juga bersama menyerikan majlis.
ANWAR IBRAHIM
———-
The Rule of Law and Judicial Independence
Speech by Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim at the launching of “Anwar on Trial – In the Face of Injustice” by Pawancheek Marican in Kuala Lumpur on 14th September, 2009 at the De Palma Hotel, Ampang
Today I would like to share with you some thoughts about a subject which I believe is close to our hearts. Not just to politicians, lawyers or social workers but to every member of society. It is so close that without it the very foundation of a free and democratic society crumbles. It is called the rule of law.
According to F.A. Hayek, this means that government in all its actions is bound by rules fixed and announced beforehand which make it possible to foresee with fair certainty how the authority will use its coercive powers in given circumstances, and to plan one’s individual affair on the basis of this knowledge. That definition is indeed a powerful formulation of the concept but I would hasten to add a major rider to it, which is, that the coercive powers referred to must be predicated on the basis that the laws in the first place must meet the criterion of justness. Hence the rule of law means the exercise of publicly justifiable power. I emphasise the phrase ‘publicly justifiable power’ because not every law that comes out of Parliament is publicly justifiable. In other words, the rule of law requires the application of moral standards to legislative output. And this is because every individual possesses rights founded on justice which are inviolable. The positivity of law is not sufficient to establish its lawfulness. If laws are unjust then the rule of law itself is in jeopardy.
The Internal Security Act is a classic instance of this injustice. It offends against human dignity and it violates our fundamental rights but it still continues to be used arbitrarily against those seen as possible threats to the ruling elite. We have a written constitution which guarantees our liberties including freedom from arbitrary arrest. Yet the use of the ISA to silence political dissent makes a mockery of this guarantee. Just two months ago, we witnessed one of the largest manifestations of the people’s opposition to this draconian law but tragically, the UMNO-controlled agencies responded with even greater use of tyranny and oppression.
So among the paramount characteristics of the rule of law concerns the judiciary. In this regard, judges must exercise their powers in accordance with the rule of law and not the rule of men. Translated into the real world, this means the judiciary must not be accountable to the Prime Minister. If the rule of law is to mean anything, one of the essential prerequisites is that the judiciary must be independent.
We saw back in 1988 how the institution was dealt a fatal blow by the powers that be then and we saw in 1998 how it was not just me who was given a black eye but the judiciary itself, thanks to the perverse decisions of two High Court judges then. These are the same judges who now warm the seats of our Appellate courts, enjoying the fruits of their perversity, as it were. Is it then any wonder that today history is again repeating itself?
We would have thought that the lessons of March 8th 2008 would have taught the political masters some fundamental truths regarding the legitimate expectations of the people. One of which is that the people don’t want to see the judicial process turned into a circus. We are tired of seeing judges as mere puppets dancing to the tune of the political masters.
The latest instance of this judicial aberration can be seen in the decision just last week in respect of the suit filed by the legitimate Pakatan speaker over the Perak debacle on May 7, 2009. The court held that in accordance with Article 72 of the Federal Constitution, “the validity of any proceeding in any state assembly cannot be questioned in any court”. Well, that indeed sounds very impressive and laudable in the context of respecting the concept of the separation of powers. But then why is it that in the same breath the court also held that the legislative assembly’s decision to remove the speaker and to appoint someone else was conclusive and had been fairly determined by the state assembly? I have heard of judges making wrong decisions based on a misinterpretation of the law but I don’t recall judges blowing hot and blowing cold in the same judgement. In coming to this conclusion, we may say that the court has sunk into the abyss of judicial reasoning displaying in the process clear symptoms of judicial schizophrenia. The question now is not whether we should challenge such a decision. Indeed we must, but I believe even more importantly, there is a moral duty to speak out against such a gross travesty of justice.
In practical terms, judicial independence must mean protecting citizens against illegitimate usurpation of power. Indeed, the travesty of justice that continues to plague us in the Perak debacle remains a stark reminder that the separation of powers envisaged in a democracy remains largely a mirage in the constitutional landscape.
The topic of our gathering tonight is the launch of this important book and recognition of its author, a dear friend of mine, Pawancheek Marican. It is of course rare to find in today’s Malaysia such a comprehensive account of an event so controversial in our nation’s history. Applying no varnish to the entire sordid affair I believe this text will be a signpost for generations of Malaysians on the dangers of absolute power. He has also paid a great tribute to the the legal team that defended not just me but an entire nation against the onslaught of executive power run amok. For those present and absent who had a hand in the trial and particulary the lawyers, words cannot convey the deep gratitude that I, Azizah and my family have for their work – which I might add is not yet done.
Now with reference to the trials prosecuted against me, as so well documented in Pawancheek’s book, suffice it to say that the judges were essentially under the thumb of the Executive. There is a saying that when the law is subjugated to the chicanery of politics, that is, where the judges are subservient to the political masters, the administration of justice becomes both farcical and perverse.
In a real democracy, the use of judicial high-handedness to bring down a political opponent won’t be tolerated because of the existence of a transparent court system and a process of accountability. In a sham democracy, however, judicial highhandedness is given free rein and transparency is irrelevant. Those prosecuted for political reasons are thus condemned even before the trial begins. It is not just about me or some of our friends here today.
There are now a few other high profile cases pending. For example, the persecution of Raja Petra will certainly be top on the list of the study on the breakdown of the rule of law. I emphasise the word ‘persecution’ because the manner in which he is being hounded is no longer prosecution but sheer audacious use of blatant state powers in order to bring down one one of the government’s most strident and vocal critics. These actions violate the dignity and honour of all Malaysians.
Instead of being the ultimate guardians of our liberty from executive tyranny, the judiciary is then transformed into principals in the destruction of the very process it was entrusted to protect. Indeed, the undermining of judicial independence by political interference has negative repercussions not only on society at large but on the nation as a whole. Very often the inability to assert independence seems to be inversely proportional to the degree of integrity. Judges must display competence and expertise and they must be above suspicion. We are by now very familiar with the videotape of the “correct, correct, correct” judicial scandal but have we seen any action yet? And where judges are not seen to be absolutely above board, the establishment of equity and fair play in commercial and economic deliberations will be largely illusory. This would also explain why Malaysia continues to occupy dismal positions in the corruption index, not to mention how much further we have sunk in competitiveness.
Another crucial criterion for the rule of law is that the discretion of law enforcement agencies must not be allowed to pervert the cause of justice.3 We know that not only the judiciary but the police and the Attorney General’s office play essential roles in the preservation of the rule of law, failing which they are easily used to pervert the law. Selective prosecution, police highhandedness and arbitrary arrests, and now of course the actions of the MACC, all collectively serve to pervert the cause of justice rather than uphold the rule of law. And in all these, the ruling UMNO government is not only complicit but blatantly instrumental in perpetuating these gross transgressions. The upshot is harassment, oppression, and in most cases, the extermination of the small fry while the large predators continue to roam free. The Pakatan controlled government of Selangor will remain a classic case study of the systematic abuse by Federal law enforcement agencies under the thumb of the ruling federal clique.
The arrogance of power has rendered them completely impermeable to public opinion. The extension of the IGP’s contract just last week flies in the face of the overwhelming chorus of objections from the people. The increasing incidences of custodial deaths and the blatant bias of the MACC in carrying out its duties are but two examples of this breakdown in the rule of law.
The very root of this problem goes to the question of accountability. We have seen what it is like. Without accountability these agencies literally get away with murder. They are certainly getting away with corruption. The instances are too many to enumerate but it would be accurate to say that the amounts involved get bigger by the year. We know about the billions earmarked for the stimulus packages but where has the money gone? How much longer can we allow public financial resources to be used in complete disregard of the rules of accountability?
The proper application of the rule of law would have meant that those who occupy the seats of power must be subject to scrutiny and held accountable for their misdeeds. They must realise that power and authority are but duty and obligation and not right and privilege. Will they ever be brought to justice?
In the final analysis, the idea of justice to man is so central to the rule of law that you can’t have one without the other. Corruption and the abuse of public office, the absence of transparency in financial dealings, the perversion of justice by the law enforcement agencies and the dereliction of judicial duty – these are indeed characteristics of the rule of men, and not the rule of law. The trappings of democracy cannot mask this perversion.
Reform is way overdue but on the eve our our Malaysia Day celebrations let us renew our commitment to freedom and to justice.
Thank you.
Dear DSAI!
I take my hats off to you for this speech! Where have all the good politicans gone? Probably feeling better if they never entered politics because it (politics) is a dirty word!!!! For now there is one consolation….at least till the next GE we still have the likes of you, LKS and Zaid Ibrahim, to mention a few, who can stand up to the BN/UMNO machinery!!!!! Keep going because the Rakyat is always behind you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Das
Reply
Fairdinkum ,
a kangaroo court wasn’t it suppose to be the Westminister style
of wig attired judges who had everything to be lauded about.
Reply
Yes indeed, all of us are sporting a black eye today, no thanks to the current Malaysian skewed judiciary. Regardless of whether one is BN or PR camp, the judiciary is today out of whack and has come under the domain of the ruling warlords instead of adhering to international standards.
Perhaps the judges today are better off wearing jungle outfits to reflect more closely to what is being dished out in the courts today.
Reply
The whole country justice system really sucked…never never get suck into it…whatever it is DSAI the rakyat are with you…When PR Govn plesae make sure Rule with Fair and Just !
Reply
Rakyat are not with you. sorry..
Reply
Otak Kosong Reply:
September 16th, 2009 at 1:16 am
hello brader anonymous,
i 100% agree with you and also if your family or relatives or friends are NOT with you too, sorry my mind is blank now cannot think properly…!
Reply
NIBONG TEBAL GUY Reply:
September 16th, 2009 at 9:45 am
hello anonymous nut, wait till you ‘fall’ into the same if not similar ‘trap’ as DSAI. Only “experiance is the best teacher” as said all these years. You may be MIGHTY today, just wait…… I have been seeing it for the last 60 years!
Reply
wah Reply:
September 16th, 2009 at 10:52 am
Anonymous,rakyat akan bersama pemimpin yang bersih,jauh dari rasuah, amanah ,adil dan yang sentiasa berkorban untuk rakyat . Pemimpin seperti DSAI, Lim Kit Siang , Lim Guan Eng dan lain-lain YB PR yang di penjarakan bukan kerana rasuah tetapi untuk rakyat dan membongkar banyak PARA ahli politik yang berlainan aruan. Hanya rakyat yang mata duitan dan tidak ada hati manusia yang akan menyokong mereka merampas harta dan kebebasan rakyat. Kami seharus timbang sikap peribadi seseorang dari semua segi, masa lalu dan pemikiran sekarang. Kalau mereka telah insaf atas kesalahan mereka, kita maaf mereka. Kita bertolak ansur dan memberi peluang kepada pemimpin yang bersedia memimpin negara kearah kemajuan dan mempunyai maruah tinggi di mata kaca dunia. Kita harus sentiasa ungrade mutu pemikiran kita dan tidak dipengaruhi oleh media tertentu saja. Kita individu tersendi , kita dengar,kita fikir dan kita tapis dan buangkan kotoran yang merosakan badan kita. Kita akan senang bawa diri walaupun menghadapi musuh. Bagaimanapun, sehingga sekarang DSAI adalah tokoh politik yang sentiasa bersama rakyat. Beliau berpelajaran dan senang memperoleh kemewahan dalam arena komersial dan perniagaan ,tapi beliau memilih jalan yang berduri dan terpaksa mempulas otak, mengadai badan berkejar kesana-sini memberi ceramah semata-mata untuk membela masa depan rakyat Beliau adalah harapan rakyat 1 Malaysia buat masa kini.
Reply
vengai Reply:
September 16th, 2009 at 9:14 pm
Anon 4.24.
Its obious u are an UBNO ass licker. Your brain is not in your head but in your ass.
Only the lazy, corrupted ,cronies of UMNO Putras are not with DSAI.And those Bee End component parties which are the ask lickers of UMNO and their suppoters and cronies not behind DSAI.
Sorry ass licking anon 4.24 you get it wrong.Now the Rakyat is not with the Tainted UBN Regime which full of taited suckers.
The Regime leaders are pissing in pants every day now.
They are just surviving and rules using the help of their unregistered component parties like PeeRDM,MAsaisai,SPeeRM,Correct correct correct,
SPeeeHantuRaya,and latest MsiMsi and some selfish Tujah whatseeat.
Go and tell yoyr opinion to the tenants in Tampoi and Tanjong Rambutan.They will believe you because you are one of them too.
Reply
VERY TRUE>UMNO/MCA/MIC BN LAWS ALWAYS UNJUST,UNETHICAL,ANTI DEMOCRACY,
ANTI HUMANITY.GOOD BEHAVIOUR AND MORALITY?UPHOLDING THE CONSTITUTION?DONT EXPECT UMNO BN TO PRACTICE.THEY ARE JUST ANTI-GOOD GOVERNANCE,ANTI-TRANSPARENCY AND ANTI-ACCOUNTABILITY.
UMNO CONTINUE TO ABUSE THE NEP >THAT FAVOURS ONLY THE RULING ELITES INSTEAD OF HELPING OUR POOR AND NEEDY MALAY MASSES.
SABAH/SARAWAK VOTERS DONT 4GET ALTANTUYA IMMIGRATION RECORDS DELETED!!!!!!
Reply
I am truly impressed with DSAI’s speech. Looking forward to the day he becomes our next Prime Minister who’ll save Malaysia.
Reply
Way to go DSAI, my vote for you. I’ll convince all my friends to support PR all the way.
Reply
A great speech by a very great Malaysian. You have my vote DSAI.
Reply
The moment UMNO applies rule of law….UMNO BARU is finished.
12th GE…makes them more aware they need rule of men to protect them.
t
These are bullies and cowards…with no principles in life.
UMNO is corrupted to the core..just laws and democracy means nothing to them.
UMNO is never the same….since Mahathir took over.
The signs are UMNO not only corrupted to the core…but the formula to rule forever must continue.
It starts with the jailing of Anwar…at all cost..law or no law.
It will be provocations..irritations…bullying…instigating ..scheming…telling half truths..and worst of all..insulting cultures and religions of others..with the hope race angers some and respond will fights…for reasons to rule by proxy….if not directly.
They are daily observing Malaysians reactions and behaviors….for or against them.
Anwar’s speech is so simple..clear…so lawful ..and spoken many times before…yet some law makers…be it police or judicial men…keep ignoring with no guilty conscience whatsoever..to serve a master instead of serving the country and people.
The fact that UMNO is corrupted to the core…is a fact..then these rouges will never change.
Catch a crook knowing he will be hanged…he will rather fight to the end.. than be caught.
Compare this..and you can see UMNO will never change.
Being crooked politicians and is governing the country…they hold the advantage..with some hope…Malaysians are idiots…..keep on trusting them. They dare not show their real faces and true colour..and will fight to the end…like gangsters……but in political and diplomatic ways.
They will apply all sorts of stunts…acts…subtle bribes given..to please the masses…hoping to increase their chances to be elected again in the 13th GE.
We can expect to see signs of their confidences or desperate moods through their daily actions and speeches.
Right now…it is dog eat dog…cats fight cats…actor exposing actor..signs seen in UMNO and BN.
Anwar will be PM..be it in jail or a free man…he will be PM.
If Najib thinks it is his destiny to be the last PM from UMNO…then the first from opposition will be Anwar.
UMNO know that too well…and that’s why Anwar is UMNO BARU priority to shut his mouth..to make him disappear…to be in jail at all cost.
Lets hope the Judges will stand united to perform with rules of laws close to their hearts…once and for all …with no fear nor favoring anyone.
Lets hope corrupted judges fear no man ….but Allah.
Reply
otc Reply:
September 16th, 2009 at 12:10 am
Well said. My vote is for PR.
Reply
Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim (DSAI) dan semua warga,
Izinkan saya menulis dalam dwibahasa sebagai menghormati bahasa kebangsaan tanahair kita, Bahasa Malaysia/Melayu dan juga bahasa perutusan global dewasa kini, Bahasa Inggeris.
Setelah kali terakhir saya memasuki alam maya dengan tujuan satu-satunya saya memasuki alam maya hanyalah untuk menulis komen-komen dalam blog DSAI dan Datuk Seri Dr. Chua Soi Lek. Izinkan saya menulis sepatah kata dua (dari dulu lagi penggunaan terma ’sepatah kata dua’ oleh saya bermaksud ’sepatah kata atau dua’) yang berbentuk positif dan tujuan ilmiah. Cuma bezanya, saya tidak pernah menulis apa-apapun komen dalam blog Dr. Chua Soi Lek.
Saya memulakan dengan menyalin kembali sepotong ayat emas karangan Thomas Paine yang diterbitkan dalam Pennsylvania Magazine, Julai 1775: ‘As the union between spiritual freedom and political liberty seems nearly inseparable, it is our duty to defend both.’
Dalam pengamatan DSAI dan segala kepimpinan Pakatan Rakyat, “bolehkah suatu dunia baru wujud sekiranya segala tatacara dan taktik dunia lama yang jijik, yang penuh dengan penyelewengan, salahguna kuasa, rasuah, kekerasan, keganasan dan kekerasan masih digunapakai?”. Hanya mereka yang dangkal pemikiran dan sememangnya rakus, sanggup berbuat demikian.
Mana-manapun pelajar undang-undang akan mempelajari bahawa ‘Nemo judex in causa sua’.
Prof. A.V. Dicey telah menjangkakan bahawa the Rule of Law hanya akan wujud sekiranya ada penghayatan penuh prinsip tersebut di atas dan kekuasaan penuh Parlimen di samping kebebasan mahkamah. Sudah tiba masanya, Peguam Negara, Ketua Polis Negara dan Ketua Pesuruhjaya SPRM dijadikan bertanggungjawab kepada Parlimen secara terus. Gagasan ini pernah diutarakan oleh Dato’ Ibrahim Ali tahun lepas.
Yang ikhlas,
Hakimi bin Abdul Jabar
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Reply
ANAK MALAYSIA Reply:
September 18th, 2009 at 5:09 am
ingat bhw kerajaan UMNO/BN pimpinan TDM pernah merampas buku tulisan DSAI(bekas TPM/MENTERI KEWANGAN) yg bertajuk “KEBANGKITAN ASIA(THE ASIAN RENAISANCE)” dlm edisi bhs melayu ketika TDM menjadi perdana menteri dulu kerana tidak mahu rakyat malaysia membaca buku tersebut kerana beliau ingat kita ini bodoh dulu.
Reply
(in propria causa nemo iudex)
no-one should be a judge in their own cause. It is a principle of natural justice that no person can judge a case in which they have an interest. The rule is very strictly applied to any appearance of a possible bias, even if there is actually none: “Justice must not only be done, but must be seen to be done”.
(Audi alteram partem)
“Hear the other party” otherwise put “Reasonable opportunity must be given to each party, to present his side of the case”. The legal effect of a breach of natural justice is normally to stop the proceedings and render any judgment invalid; it should be quashed or appealed, but may be remitted for a valid re-hearing.
Friedrich Hayek in his book, ”The Constitution of Liberty” (1961), wrote: “By ‘law’ we mean the general rules that apply equally to everybody… As a true law should not name any particulars, so it should especially not single out any specific persons or group of persons… the rules must apply to those who lay them down and those who apply – that is, to the government as well as the governed – and that nobody has the power to grant exceptions.”
Rule of law can also be viewed as a general legal maxim according to which decisions should be made by applying known principles or laws, without the intervention of discretion in their application.This maxim is intended to be a safeguard against arbitrary governance. The word “arbitrary” (from the Latin “arbiter”) signifies a judgment made at the discretion of the arbiter, rather than according to the rule of law.
Reply
Dear Brother, and Sisters,
Salam,
Please refrain from insults, a wise man once sayes – treat with respect, and you will get respect.
Keep your friend close, but your enemy closer.
Reply
When state institutions have been so systematically undermined for the perpetuation of political power, when even the instruments of justice are perverted, how will the rhetoric of 1Malaysia camouflage the rot that has set in ?
Reply
Penerbit dan penulis buku “Anwar on trial” harapan saya segerakan lah diterbit dalam Bahasa Melayu, saya rasa dan mungkin ramai menunggu buku ini terbitkan dalam Bahasa Melayu. Bukan apa, kami dididik dalam suasana dasar bahasa kebangsaan, semua pelajaran dalam Bahasa Melayu. Bukan tak tahu bahasa inggeris tapi biarlah kami yang dari golongan marhin dapat membacanya bersama….!
Reply
wah Reply:
September 16th, 2009 at 11:14 am
Setuju, kalau ada modal, buat terbitan dalam semua bahawa utama, China, Tamil ,Bahasa Jawi ,Monggol dll. Biar ramai lagi golongan dapat membacanya .
Reply
Asalam Datuk, buku tu ada dijual di kedai-kedai biasa ke? Jika tiada, boleh ke dibeli secara on-line.? Ini adalah satu sejarah negara, yang akan dijadikan satu koleksi bernilai di dalam perpustakaan saya. Terima kasih.
Reply
caldina Reply:
September 16th, 2009 at 2:44 pm
aku rs takde kdai buku nk jual..mn taknye kang klu jual, kene rampas plk..haa..kan bn/amngok ni dh bese main rampas2 ap2 terbitan PR ni..suara keadilan ngn harakah pun dh pernah kene rampas..ni kan plk buku yg nk bogelkan bn/amngok, lagi la dorg tak nak..ni kwn2 sume email kat cni..nt die reply email korg..so bleh order..rm38 jek..murah jek tuh..cpt2 beli..
kerajaan.rakyat@gmail.com
Reply
caldina Reply:
September 16th, 2009 at 2:48 pm
sp beli 10 dan ke atas buku tu dpt diskaun 15%…hrge br rm38 sebijik..cpt!! sp nk beli email kat
kerajaan.rakyat@gmail.com
taip jek kate nk beli buku..nt dorg reply..
Reply
I think it would better if the Book distributed together with Gula-gula Hacks. Ha Ha.
Reply
Translation in Bahasa Melayu would be nice.
Reply
mari ramai2 beli buku tu..aku dh order 1!! 1 vote 4 PR!!
Reply
The ratio decidendi of the case may include, the chemical evidences – DNA, and so on. I fear the odds of winning may dim if there is bias, in judgement.
regards
Reply
perlancaran buku atau perluncuran buku….mana satu ni? minta dibetolkan.
Reply
caldina Reply:
September 17th, 2009 at 9:14 am
ntahla..kkdg2 word DSAI ni pun aku tak phm..yek la, DSAI dulu lame kt Indon..kwn2 pun rmi negara2 lain..mn la tau btul die gune istilah tu..hehe..sbbnye takkan smpai 2 huruf tersilap taip dlm satu perkataan..dhtu huruf a ngn u kt keyboard ni pun jauh..hmmm..musykil2..
Reply
ANAK MALAYSIA Reply:
September 18th, 2009 at 5:10 am
ingat….bhs melayu dtg dr indonesia……
Reply
mesti beli ni hehe
Reply
caldina Reply:
September 17th, 2009 at 9:14 am
beli jgn tak beli..promote kat kwn2 lain..
Reply
hari ni dh terdedah psl isu pkfz..habislah bn/amno..PR dh dpt dokumen yg state kementerian kewangan yg luluskan peruntukan utk pkfz ditambah dr 1.088 billion kpd 4.6327 billion.nk luluskan plk kene persetujuan kabinet..mknenye semue menteri2 terlibat ngn isu pkfz ni..semue kene ltak jwtn!!! patutla laju jek najib tubuhkan badan bertindak die sndiri, tak nak tubuhkan siasatan suruhanjaya diraja..haa, spt dijangka, mmg dorg ni semue ade terlibat..tu la menteri2 bodoh ni, habis semue peraturan die langgar…bnyk tu..lbih 3.5 billion duit rakyat hangus…isk sdihnye aku rs…rkyat gk yg tsiksa..
Reply
sejak pemecatan tun salleh abbas sebg ketua hakim negara pada 1988,byk yg tak kena di institusi kehakiman d negara ini termasuk institusi kepolisian….
ini pesanan dr mendiang michael jackson terutama lagu bertajuk “tabloid junkies”,jgn mendengar pihak media yg membawa berita yg belum tentu benar belaka lg kerana ia akan membawa fitnah ke dlm masyarakat kita.
Reply
Buku ANWAR ON TRIAL boleh dibeli secara ONLINE dari GERAKBUDAYA.COM, POPULAR BOOKS, MPH PUBLISHERS, SILVERFISH BOOKS.
Secara direct buku ini boleh dibeli di kedai-kedai buku seperti POPULAR BOOKS, MPH PUBLISHERS, KINOKUNIYA & SILVERFISH BOOKS.
Harcover – RM 100/-
Softcover – 50/-
Sekian, terima kasih.
Hamba Allah.
Reply
Dear DSAI,I am fedup with our judiciary system,MACC,and Police,who is controlled by the exective from the time of Mahatir era.With Najib there is no different.I have been member of keadilan from day one.Najib is day dreaming of over throwing the Selangor state government with the evil TOYOL in Bahasa means bad spirit.Toyol have done alot of damage to Selangor State.DSAI I would like to advice PAKATAN unity to choose the right candidate for National election which willbe held on or before 2013.DSAI the by-election in Batang Pinang is very crucial for PAS(PAKATAN)to win and I would like to inform you that work on the Indian voters because of the injuries they receive from the MIC recent election majority of delegate votes went to Subra and Sothi and the Indians are very angry how Samyvellu manuplated the delegates and MIC is no more important to the Indians not only that the MCA is divided too.Dsai I like to congratulate Tan Sri for his good work in Selangor and he is the good spirit not like Toyol the bad and bad spirit.Iam with you all the way DSAI AND DON’T WORRY ABOUT ALL CHARGES BROUGHT AGAINST YOU AND AS YOU USE TO SAY IT POLITICAL MOTIVATED AND I STRONGLY BELIEVE. HAVE GOOD HARI RAYA ADIL FITRI AND IWISH ALL MY MUSLIM BROTHERS SELAMAT HARI RAYA.MAY GOD BE WITH YOU.
SINGGH IS KINGG
Reply
Hidup DSAI!
Reply
salam semua,
karya macam ni memang bagus, semua orang dapat tahu apa yang berlaku. ada satu karya oleh sesorang yang melibatkan sebuah agensi kewangan yang dikira paling berkuasa didunia. banyak negara ambil pinjaman darinya tapi kita tak. kalau tahun 97-98, memang top la namanya tu..karya tu tak publish lagi, tapi dah lama siap, takut nak publish…karya tu ceritakan apa syarat-syarat dlm perjanjian kewangan ni, kenapa sesetengah negara boleh terima dan kenapa sesetengannya tak boleh. bila kita amati halus-halus kita akan tahu agensi ada buruk baiknya dan kesan2nya kepada pemerintah, lebih2 lagi pemerintah yang korup. dan apa kesannya utk jangka masa panjang kepada rakyat negara yang meminjam darinya. agensi tu terlalu berkuasa sampaikan kekadang dia yang menentukan berapa banyak dia bg pinjam, kalau negara2 miskin yang tak ada kepakaran mengruskan ekonomi dia yang tunjuk ajar macam mana nak buat, bila nak lantik peguam pun dia yang tentukan peguam mana,semuanya dia, so negara2 yang lemah ni ikut je la telunjuk dia tu.. saya pun baru tahu benda2 ni…banyak lagi yang dicieritakan dalam karya tu..
Reply