Archive for May, 2009



19
May

Why Sivakumar is still the Speaker – Tommy Thomas

From The Malaysian Insider

MAY 19 – I am asked to advise V. Sivakumar, the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly of the State of Perak, on the constitutionality of his purported removal on May 7, 2009.

1. It is common ground that the Legislative Assembly was summoned that day by His Royal Highness, the Sultan of Perak (“HRH”) pursuant to Article 36(1) of the Constitution of Perak.

It is also not in dispute that the meeting on May 7, 2009 was the First Sitting of the Second Session of the 12th Legislative Assembly of Perak, marking the commencement of the 2nd session of a five-year Parliamentary term.

A. FACTS

2. Sivakumar’s alleged removal must be seen in the context of the extraordinary events that took place on the floor of the Assembly on May 7 2009. As to what occurred, I have relied on the live coverage of the events as reported in Malaysiakini, and the Chronology of Events published in the May 8 issue of the Sun newspaper. Hopefully, a combined reading of these 2 contemporary accounts would present an accurate summary of the facts. The time-line, as I understand it, is set out in Appendix A hereto.

3. From the facts narrated in Appendix A, it is clear that:-

Continue reading ‘Why Sivakumar is still the Speaker – Tommy Thomas’

19
May

Tiga Alasan Najib Bacul Di Penanti

Dari Johor Daily

Johor Bahru – Barisan Nasional gentar mencabar calon PKR pada pilihanraya kecil DUN Penanti , kata pengerusinya Datuk Seri Najib Razak. Alasan Najib ialah :

Pertama, kekosongan kerusi itu bukan diperuntukkan oleh perlembagaan tetapi satu usaha PKR untuk menyelesaikan masalah dalamannya.
Kedua, pilihanraya kecil ini satu permainan politik pembangkang.
Ketiga, BN lebih mengutamakan khidmat kepada rakyat dan langkah memulihkan ekonomi negara.

Tetapi Najib menafikan BN takut tewas di kerusi tersebut. Namun Johor Daily difahamkan 3 alasan tersirat menjadi igauan buruk Najib iaitu :

Pertama, janji kepada surau dan masjid belum ditunaikan.
Kedua, sumpah tidak menenali Altantua adalah sumpah penipu dan bimbang dilantati Allah.
Ketiga, kononnya tidak mahu ikut telunjuk Tun Mahathir agar turut bertanding dan bimbang imejnya tercalar jika kalah sekali lagi .

19
May

Anwar: Umno mungkin taja calon bebas di Penanti

Dari AIC

19 Mei-Ketua Pembangkang, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim berkata, Umno tidak bertanding di Penanti kerana parti itu tidak sedia bertarung dan menyerahkan kuasa kepada rakyat untuk membuat pilihan.

Beliau yang juga ketua umum PKR berkata, alasan Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak adalah tidak munasabah kerana ini pertama kali Umno tidak bertanding apabila ada kekosongan kerusi.

“Dalam apa jua alasan, jika ada kekosongan Pakatan Rakyat menyerahkan kepada kebijaksanaan dan keputusan rakyat.

“Hujah ini satu helah kerana Umno selalu tabik dada (mengaku) kuat dan relevan,” katanya kepada wartawan selepas ceramah di Taman Medan Petaling Jaya malam tadi, sempena pelancaran kempen penerangan “Krisis Perak: Kembali Pada Rakyat”.

Semalam, Dewan Tertinggi BN memutuskan tidak akan bertanding dalam pilihanraya kecil Penanti. Perdana menteri memberi tiga sebab BN menolak bertanding kerusi tersebut.

bullet buttonPertama, kekosongan kerusi itu bukan diperuntukkan oleh perlembagaan tetapi satu usaha PKR untuk menyelesaikan masalah dalamannya.

bullet buttonKedua, pilihanraya kecil ini satu permainan politik pembangkang.

bullet buttonKetiga, BN lebih mengutamakan khidmat kepada rakyat dan langkah memulihkan ekonomi negara.

Najib juga menafikan BN takut tewas di kerusi tersebut.

Ceramah dapat permit

Mengulas lanjut, Anwar bagaimanapun berkata, Pakatan menghadapi kemungkinan Umno akan menaja calon bebas di Penanti.

“Itu belum pasti, bagaimanapun Pakatan akan terus bekerja untuk menghadapi pilihanraya tersebut,” katanya.

Sementara itu ketika berucap di majlis tersebut, Anwar mengulangi pendirian Pakatan yang mahukan DUN Perak dibubarkan dan menyerahkan kepada rakyat untuk membuat keputusan.

Katanya, Pakatan menghormati Istana tetapi yang membuat keputusan bukan Istana, bukan hakim tetapi rakyat.

“Di Perak kita yakin akan menang lebih besar kerana (rakyat) mahukan perubahan,” katanya.

Selain Anwar, beberapa pemimpin Pakatan turut berucap di majlis tersebut.

Kira-kira 5,000 orang membanjiri kawasan lapang di Taman Medan untuk mendengar ceramah mengenai krisis politik di Perak.

Ceramah tersebut mendapat permit polis.

19
May

Pertemuan Dengan Pimpinan KeADILan Sarawak

Dua malam lalu saya ka Kuching menyertai forum Isu Perak dan Hak Rakyat. Sekitar jam 10 malam, saya mempengerusikan pertemuan dengan pimpinan KeADILan Sarawak.

Saya menggariskan peranan yang perlu dimainkan olih pimpinan negeri bagi menjana perubahan bermakna di Sarawak.

Saya turut mengumumkan perlantikan saudara Mustafa Kamil Ayub selaku penyelaras dan mengambilalih tugas saya selaku pengerusi sementara perhubungan negeri Sarawak.

ANWAR IBRAHIM

19
May

Mahkamah Tinggi: Sultan tidak boleh pecat MB

Dari Malaysiakini

Sultan Perak Sultan Azlan Shah tidak boleh memecat Datuk Seri Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin dari jawatannya kerana beliau (menteri besar) tidak memegang jawatan itu atas perkenan baginda.

Ini keputusan Hakim Mahkamah Tinggi Datuk Abdul Aziz Abdul Rahim pada 11 Mei lalu, bila beliau mengisytiharkan Nizar sebagai menteri besar Perak yang sah.

Dalam penghakiman 78-muka yang dikeluarkan kepada media hari ini, Abdul Aziz berkata sebaik saja menteri besar dilantik, beliau dan majlis exconya bertanggungjawab kepada Dewan Undangan Negeri dan tiada siapa lain.

Beliau berkata ini menurut fasal (2), (5), (6) dan (7) Artikel 16 Undang-undang Tubuh Negeri Perak, lapor Bernama.

“Sebaik saja menteri besar dilantik, menteri besar mentadbir negeri menerusi Majlis Eksekutif dan menasihatkan Sultan mengenai hal ehwal negeri sebagaimana diperuntukkan di bawah Artikel 18 (1) Undang-undang Tubuh Negeri Perak.

Continue reading ‘Mahkamah Tinggi: Sultan tidak boleh pecat MB’

19
May

Najib as a ‘Text-book’ PM

By Fudzail

I had a very interesting discussion with an UAE businessman about our PM. The discussion started with his concerns on our political and economic situations. He did not mince his words with his disgust towards United Malay National Organisation politics, policies etc.

For the record, we have known each other since a decade ago. He has big doubts on Najib’s worthiness and leadership qualities. He has been following Malaysia politics since Mahathir’s days.

“Your PM is a ‘text-book’ leader. What a joke to tell the world about reading Blue Ocean book on the eve of swearing as a new PM and how stupid to announce his plan to incorporate the book’s ideas into his administration..he lacks brain!”

Continue reading ‘Najib as a ‘Text-book’ PM’

18
May

BN Enggan Lawan PKR di Penanti

Dari Malaysiakini
Jimadie Shah Othman

Seperti dimaklumkan lebih awal, Barisan Nasional tidak bersedia mencabar calon PKR pada pilihanraya kecil DUN Penanti yang bermula Sabtu ini, kata pengerusinya Datuk Seri Najib Razak hari ini.

Perdana menteri juga menggariskan tiga sebab BN menolak untuk bertanding di kerusi tersebut.

Pertama, kekosongan kerusi itu bukan diperuntukkan oleh perlembagaan tetapi satu usaha PKR untuk menyelesaikan masalah dalamannya.

Kedua, pilihanraya kecil ini satu permainan politik pembangkang.

Ketiga, BN lebih mengutamakan khidmat kepada rakyat dan langkah memulihkan ekonomi negara.

Najib menafikan BN takut tewas di kerusi tersebut.

“Tak ada (takut). Macam mana pun kita mesti hadapi rakyat dalam pilihanraya umum akan datang,” jelasnya apabila diajukan soalan sama ada BN takut menghadapi pembangkang.

Continue reading ‘BN Enggan Lawan PKR di Penanti’

18
May

Perplexing judiciary in Perak lawsuit

From The Malaysian Insider

MAY 18 — As of today it is undisputable that Datuk Seri Zambry Abdul Kadir is a confirmed unlawful mentri besar of Perak. On the other hand Datuk Seri Nizar Jamaluddin is a confirmed lawful mentri besar of Perak. That is the gist of the high court’s decision delivered by Justice Datuk Abdul Aziz on May 11, 2009.

How about the stay order granted by a single Judge of the court of Appeal on May 12, 2009 ? Does the stay order invalidate the high court’s decision? The short answer is a resounding no.

The stay order merely bars the lawful mentri besar from carrying out his lawful duties and in turn allows the unlawful mentri besar to continue performing his unlawful duties. That is the gist of the court of appeal’s decision delivered on May 12, 2009.

When the high court judge made a decision allowing all the prayers sought by Nizar in his judicial review application, the learned high court judge, to his credit, gave a reasoned judgment.

Continue reading ‘Perplexing judiciary in Perak lawsuit’

18
May

Letter of Demand sent to Anifah Aman

S N NAIR & PARTNERS
Your Ref: Please Advise
Our Ref: SNN/DSAI/Anifah/09

Date: 18th May 2009

Y.B. DATUK ANIFAH BIN HJ. AMAN
By Fax 03-8889 1717
03-8889 2816

Menteri Luar Negeri,                                     Certificate of Posting
Kementerian Luar Negeri,
Aras 3, Wisma Putra, No. 1, Jalan Wisma Putra,
Presint 2,
Pusat Pentadbiran Kerajaan Persekutuan,
62602 PUTRAJAYA.

YB,

Re:      Libellous Statement

We act for Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim who is the Former Deputy Prime Minister and is presently the Leader of the Opposition in the Malaysian Parliament.

We are instructed that on or about 16th May 2009, you uttered and or made a statement at the State Department in Washington during a joint press conference with US secretary of State Mrs. Clinton, that was published and/or caused to be published by Associated Press and was consequently carried by The Star Newspaper (and several local print and electronic media), which was captioned as “Anwar offered me the DPM’s post, says Anifah” which is reproduced in full and verbatim hereinbelow:

“Anwar offered me the DPM’s post, says Anifah

Washington: Foreign Minister Datuk Anifah Aman has revealed that Opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim had offered him the post of Deputy Prime Minister as bait to switch sides after the general election last year.

“Just for the information of the audience here, Anwar said he would form a government on Sept 16 but he has changed the dates many times. And he was trying to entice Members of Parliament.

“I was personally offered a very lucrative position, like a deputy prime ministership.  These facts are not known to the world at large,” he said during a joint press conference with US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, which was packed with American and foreign journalists.

“And he has started trying to buy other legislative members. I think he has not accepted the result of the last elections.

“We (Barisan Nasional) have lost five states and we willingly accept the people’s verdict.”

A Reuters journalist had earlier asked Clinton whether she raised the Anwar issue at her meeting with Anifah as the State Department’s annual human rights report had mentioned that charges against Anwar were politically motivated.

Clinton replied that she had raised the rule of law issues and larger questions concerning institutional reforms that Malaysia had been pursuing.

Anifah, who was clam throughout, said he had faith in Malaysia’s judicial system, citing the case of Perak where the High Court had reinstated Datuk Seri Mohamad Nizar Jamaluddin as Perak Menteri Besar although it was a ruling made against the Federal Government.

Anifah said Anwar was tarnishing the image of Malaysia.

“It is our wish and hope that he will respect the democratic system in Malaysia.”

Anifah told another journalist that Malaysia would use the “good office” of the Asean secretariat to find a solution to the case involving Myanmar’s pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi who faces new charges less than two weeks before her house arrest was due to end after an American man swam across a lake and entered her home.

On improving US relations with Islamic countries, Clinton said that United States would seek out partners like Malaysia and the Organisation of the Islamic Conference for guidance.” (hereinafter called “the Impugned Article”).

Inter alia, the Impugned Article contained the following defamatory words uttered and or quoted by you about our client:

i. “Foreign Minister Datuk Anifah Aman has revealed that Opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim had offered him the post of Deputy Prime Minister as bait to switch sides after the general election last year.”

ii. “Just for the information of the audience here, Anwar said he would form a government on Sept 16 but he has changed the dates many times. And he was trying to entice Members of Parliament.”

iii. “I was personally offered a very lucrative position, like a deputy prime ministership.  These facts are not known to the world at large,” he said during a joint press conference with US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, which was packed with American and foreign journalists.”

iv. “And he has started trying to buy other legislative members. I think he has not accepted the result of the last elections.”

v. “Anifah said Anwar was tarnishing the image of Malaysia.” (collectively hereinafter called “the Impugned Words”)

The Impugned Article and the Impugned Words were and are defamatory and or libellous of our Client and in their natural and ordinary meaning and or by implication mean, meant and were understood to, inter alia, mean that:

i) our Client is a dishonest person both in his private and official capacity;

ii) our Client is a liar;

iii) our Client is an untrustworthy person as well as an unfit politician;

iv) our Client is unfit to hold public office;

v) our Client is unprincipled and corrupt;

vi) our Client has committed a criminal offence punishable with imprisonment;

vii) our Client is unethical; and

viii)our Client wantonly abuses his position in public and private office.

By innuendo, the Impugned Article and the Impugned Words were and are defamatory and or libellous of our Client and were meant and were understood to, inter alia, mean that:

i) our Client is a dishonest person both in his private and official capacity;

ii) our Client is a liar;

iii) our Client is an untrustworthy person as well as an unfit politician;

iv) our Client is unfit to hold public office;

v) our Client is unprincipled and corrupt;

vi) our Client has committed a criminal offence punishable with imprisonment

vii) our Client is unethical; and

viii) our Client wantonly abuses his position in public and private office.

Inter alia, our client contends the following in that, the Impugned Article and the Impugned Words published by you in respect of our client:-

a) are bereft of any truth, vexatious, specious, fallacious and wholly uncalled for;

b) are and were grossly negligent, reckless, irresponsible, deliberate, malicious and aimed to lower our client’s esteem in the eyes of the public, both locally and internationally, and expose our client to public hatred, scorn, odium, opprobrium, contempt and ridicule;

c) are wholly untrue, motivated by malice, mala fides, distortion of facts suggesting moral and legal impropriety on the part of our client and are principally done in your pursuit of seeking cheap publicity /sensationalism for political and other purposes; and

d) are pre-mediated and calculated to tarnish, malign, defame and seriously injure the good name and character of our client.

We are further instructed that you have republished or caused it to be republished the abovementioned Impugned Article and Impugned Words and the libellous comments.

The Impugned Words uttered and published by you in respect of our client and the comments against our client by you, amounts to a very serious libel on our client and have caused our client considerable distress and embarrassment. These Impugned Words published by you in respect of our client and comments made against our client are false, malicious and your attack on our client is wholly unjustified.

We are therefore instructed to demand from you, which we hereby do:

1) An immediate and unequivocal public retraction of the Impugned Article and the Impugned Words and the removal and retraction of all the offending and defamatory comments, forthwith;

2) An apology in the terms to be approved by us as solicitors to be published in newspapers of our client’s choice.

3) An undertaking by you not to repeat the above allegations and comments such as the Impugned Words or the likes of the same.

Our client has also instructed us to demand damages of RM100 million from you for the injury caused to our client’s reputation.

Our client has also requested us to demand payment of all legal costs that has been incurred with regard to this matter.

This letter is written in accordance with the pre-action protocol prior to the institution of a libel action. We look forward to hearing from you without delay. If we do not receive a satisfactory reply within seven (7) days of the receipt of this letter, our instructions are to institute legal proceedings against you. In the meantime, our client reserves all our client’s rights in this matter.

Please acknowledge receipt accordingly.

Thank you.

 

Yours faithfully,

S N NAIR & PARTNERS

18
May

Pendengaran Rayuan Anwar di Mahkamah Persekutuan

Mahkamah Persekutuan akan bersidang untuk mendengar rayuan Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim berhubung pemecatan beliau dari jawatan Timbalan Perdana Menteri pada tahun 1998. Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim mencabar kesahihan pemecatan tersebut kerana ianya tidak menuruti lunas Perlembagaan.

Hari: Khamis

Tempat: Mahkamah Persekutuan Putrajaya

Tarikh: 21hb Mei 2009 (Khamis)

Jam: 9.00 AM

PEJABAT DATUK SERI ANWAR IBRAHIM

17
May

Anifah Aman’s Allegations Was Baseless, Untrue & Defamatory

We SN Nair & Partners act for Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim and are authorised to issue this statement on his behalf.

Our client vehemently denies Datuk Anifah Aman’s allegations in the said story and puts him to strict proof. At no time were any such offers made to Anifah by our client.

The allegations made in the said story are baseless, untrue, defamatory and made with malicious intent to tarnish Anwar’s reputation.

We have instructions to file a defamation (libel) suit against him (Anifah) if he does not retract and make an apology within 24 hours from now.

SN NAIR

17
May

Calling passengers on Air Asia flight AK5358 from LCCT to Penang on May 13

From The Star

By Foong Pek Yee

PUTRAJAYA: All 101 passengers and five crew members who were on an AirAsia flight that flew from the low cost carrier terminal (LCCT) in Sepang to Penang on May 13 will be put under home quarantine immediately.

Health Ministry deputy director-general Datuk Dr Ramlee Rahmat said this was because the flight AK5358, was the one taken by the second confirmed influenza A (H1N1) case.

The flight had left the LCCT at 11am, he said.

Dr Ramlee said all the passengers were believed to be Malaysians and the relevant state health departments had been given a list of names to locate them.

He said those on the flight must call the Health Ministry at 03-88810200/0300 or their respective state health deparments and go to the nearest hospital if they display any flu symptoms.

Continue reading ‘Calling passengers on Air Asia flight AK5358 from LCCT to Penang on May 13′