PARTI KEADILAN RAKYAT MALAYSIA
2009 NATIONAL BUDGET AND ECONOMIC POLICY BRIEF
Parti Keadilan Rakyat (KeAdilan) recognizes that for millions of Malaysian citizens the economic climate has become a troublesome one. Malaysians today face ongoing reduction in their purchasing power, growing job insecurity, increased fuel prices, low wages, and a high gap between the rich and poor. KeAdilan believes that Malaysia can no longer afford to stand on the sidelines and allow the BN government to pursue a ‘too-little-too-late approach’ in addressing these issues. That is why, on this day, KeAdilan is pushing one more step forward its position on the Malaysian Economic Agenda, to relieve the burden on Malaysians struggling with record high inflation and dwindling economic prospects. Whereas the current government has failed to adequately address these issues, KeAdilan will pursue the policies critical to restoring Malaysia’s quality of life, economic strength and competitiveness in the global economy.
1.0 Summary:
The Parti Keadilan Rakyat (KeAdilan) proposals on the budget and response to the current BN government’s 2009 National Budget are based on a new model of socio-economic development which draws on an analysis of some of the best performing economies in the world. This specifically includes understanding the successes of Taiwan, Korea and Ireland, and integrating the best practices of these economies with the enormous potential of Malaysia’s natural and human resources and the positive aspects of Malaysia’s past development plans.
When KeAdilan’s model is implemented, the gap between Malaysia and other developed countries in terms of economic performance and living standards will be narrowed, instead of widening as it has under the current government. KeAdilan’s policies will spur a rapidly growing economy that can effectively compete at the regional and global level as well as open up numerous opportunities for all Malaysians and for all scales of business at the individual and sector levels. KeAdilan’s education and human development reforms will bring about an improved educational system and knowledge based economy that will enable Malaysia’s domestic businesses to meet the global challenge with a locally sourced and higher skilled labour force.
KeAdilan’s policy changes target attracting increased foreign and domestic investment and improving labour skills and productivity in the private and public sectors. Underlying this, and in contrast to Malaysia’s recent trends, KeAdilan is unwavering in its focus on ethical principles to ensure Malaysia’s success: fairness, transparency, accountability and good governance will be the key pillars of our economic revival.
The key features of the Parti Keadilan Rakyat Model include:
• Faster pace of economic liberalization
• Extensive investment in quality education
• Higher rate of investment in public-oriented infrastructure
• Integration with more developed ASEAN and East Asian countries
• Stronger role for the private sector
• Merit and need driven policies with a stronger safety net for the poor
• Higher standards of governance and accountability
In the near future, Pakatan Rakyat will unveil in greater detail the full policy regime of its Malaysian Economic Agenda.
2.0 Response to Barisan Nasional (BN) Malaysia 2009 National Budget:
2.1 BN Government’s Misrepresentation of the Current Situation -
The BN government’s budget has been described in mainstream BN-controlled papers as a budget with ‘something for everyone.’ KeAdilan acknowledges that on the surface this seems to be the case, but much of it is illusory. Furthermore, this economic plan will clearly not produce the concrete results that BN has been promising Malaysians. Unfortunately, it follows the trend of previous years which resulted in gross examples of mismanagement, inefficiency and missed opportunities to take Malaysia and its people forward. Since this BN government came to power, they have repeatedly emphasized to Malaysians that their economy is becoming more resilient, that people are more prosperous, that standards of living have gone up, that the country has become more competitive, and that everyone has benefited equally from the country’s growth. Yet, KeAdilan believes that many citizens are aware that the reality of Malaysian achievement compared with other countries, particularly in the context of this country’s enormous potential in human and natural resources, is far from the BN government’s rosy rhetoric. KeAdilan believes that the disillusionment and disenchantment of our citizens was clearly demonstrated at the ballot box in March and in August of this year.
The socio-economic impact of the BN government’s mismanagement include:
• Worsening socio-economic disparities
• Rising income inequalities
• Spiraling costs of living
• Growing urban and rural poverty undetected or underestimated by the Government’s unrealistic poverty line
• Endemic corruption
• Falling competitiveness and sluggish growth
• Rising cost of doing business
The above shortcomings are in addition to the many failings on key non-economic sectors including in the field of civil liberties, judicial independence, media freedom, race relations, religious tolerance, national unity, and crime and security. While not addressed in this brief, these sectors also directly impact on the economic progress of the country. There is much evidence that the current government’s mismanagement and manipulation of developments in the social and political realm to ensure the self interests of certain individuals against that of the greater public good has impacted negatively on our economy..
2.2 Deteriorating Public Finances and Economic Sluggishness -
As the current government has not been open or honest about Malaysia’s current economic and financial position, KeAdilan is providing below various indicators which raise grave concerns about the level of financial and economic mismanagement under BN rule:
1. Operational expenditure in the 2009 National Budget has had an alarming increase of almost 20% year-to-year, now up to RM154.2 billion from RM128.8 billion in 2008. This is an almost 100% increase or doubling from the RM80.5 billion in operating expenditure in 2004 when Datuk Seri Abdullah Badawi first became Prime Minister. And finally, a further worry is that the current operating budget is nearly a 200% or three-fold increase from that in 2000.
2. Malaysia is suffering from sluggish domestic investment, despite not being short of domestic capital. Private fixed capital formation averaged less than half of total fixed capital formation. In addition, since the current government first entered office, Malaysian investments abroad (outward FDI) has risen dramatically: from less than 50% of inward FDI in 2004, to approximately equal to inward FDI in 2006, and to the position now of exceeding inward foreign investment. This is not characteristic of any growing economy in the world. It raises grave concerns about the type of policies and the driving Malaysian capital flight.
3. The economy grew 6.3% in the three months ending in June from a year earlier, down from a 7.1% gain in the first quarter. Economic growth is forecast to slow to 5.7% this year and 5.4% in 2009, the weakest pace since 2005. The figures suggest potentially a growth of just 4% for Q4 2008. The government’s proposed budget will be unable to do the heavy lifting required of it in 2009. KeAdilan is concerned that the government has no plan to increase Malaysian growth other than pinning its hopes on a global upturn in 2009 to lift our growth rate.
4. Inflation was at a 27-year high of 7.7% in June as a result of the government’s mismanagement of the petrol subsidy issue. There are signs that it is worsening. For July’s inflation rate Bank Negara’s Monthly Statistical Bulletin (Table VI.13), gives a figure of 8.5% increase in the CPI, with food rising 11.2%, non-food rising 7.2%, transport rising 22.7%l, and consumer non-durables rising 15.4%. While KeAdilan acknowledges that higher transport and food prices are working their way through the economy and is commited to strong action to ensure that the advserse impacts are minimized, the government appears oblivious to this fact.
5. The fiscal deficit has risen from 3.2% in 2007 to 4.8% of GDP this year
6. The KL composite index is down from 1,374 points to 1,163 year to year
7. The KL market capitalization experienced a loss of over RM200B, or almost 1/5th of its value, within one year.
8. The ringgit’s value has weakened against the major currencies. Against the US dollar, the RM recently completed its biggest monthly loss since the end of its peg against the dollar in 2005
9. Recently, Malaysia’s credit rating outlook was downgraded by Standard & Poor’s to the fourth lowest investment grade. This is indicative of government mismanagement and excesses that are putting credit ratings and currency at risk.
10. Short-term (less than one year) federal debt, the bulk of it domestic has ballooned from RM21 billion at end Mar 2004 to RM51 billion at end Jun 2008, and total federal government debt has gone from RM192 billion at end Mar 2004 to RM285 billion at end Jun 2008. This is a cause for concern of worsening fiscal health.
2.3 Government Budget Initiatives are ‘Too Little, Too Late” -
The 2009 National Budget presented by the current government last week clearly appears to collect piecemeal proposals to allocate what have been described as ‘little goodies’ to various voting blocks – the poor, the middle class, the rich, the corporate sector, and civil servants. The BN Budget lacks a disciplined and well targeted vision, and is indicative of the government’s failure to provide sound economic direction in a challenging global and domestic environment.
This analysis, however, will not focus on the small handouts and various fiscal ‘goodies’ which are fairly transparent in their political purpose. Instead, this brief is focused on analysing the substantive thrusts and programs of the BN Budget, to assess whether they can respond to the need for reform and change in our economy, and to outline the KeAdilan policy options that can lead to greater economic prosperity and security for all Malaysians in these turbulent times..
2.3.1 Suspicious Public Transport Measures
The various initiatives providing $35 billion to public transportation are ostensibly to address the needs of Malaysia’s urban population, especially in Klang Valley and KL as well as Penang. But characteristic of much of this budget it is simply too little and too late.
This large allocation will not resolve the public transport woes of the country, not even for urban commuters. Given the current systemic flaws and the past track record of BN, it is likely that the building new infrastructure without good governance, proper execution and maintenance will result in large portions of public funds going to waste, or lost through bribery and other leakages with the public transport issue largely left unresolved.
KeAdilan has two specific concerns on this issue: First, the proposed Public Land Transportation Commission is a central federal body in the PM’s Department, although these projects are almost entirely local or regional issues. Until and unless power over public transport planning and design is devolved to state and local authorities, the problem cannot be properly solved. Second, based on previous examples, there is a strong possibility of misguided centralized planning attempts and award of tenders and contracts to insider and favored companies such as Scombi which may lead to allegations of nepotism. To forestall this, KeAdilan emphasises the need for open competitive tenders, with special consideration given to genuine multi-racial partnerships in those tenders. In addition, KeAdilan has additional policy proposals for more productive public transportation initiatives it intends to pursue.
2.3.2 Failure to Strengthen the Safety Net
KeAdilan has for many years consistently criticized the meager safety net provided to Malaysia’s poorest and most vulnerable citizens. While the current government has finally taken heed of these concerns and deemed it advisable to raise the cut off point for welfare assistance and the increase in pensions for the lower levels, it is again ‘too little, too late.’ Apart from the adjustments being several years late, the proposed increases only appear to be intended to raise beneficiaries above the PLI (Poverty Line Income) established in 2004, and as published in the 9MP (Ch 16), adjusted by a mere 10%.
Of grave concern, and indicative of irresponsible policy, is that the beneficiaries of this initiative will still be below the nominal Poverty Line Income’s for Peninsula Malaysia, Sarawak and Sabah. Going by the overall CPI for the 3 regions, the adjustment from 2004 to 2008 should be closer to 120% than the 10% proposal. (As of mid-year 2008, CPI for PM was 113.4 [2005=100 ]. Seeing that the 60+% of the PLI is the food PLI, the actual adjustment should have been higher since the food weight in the CPI is around 31%). (See “Note on Safety Net for the Poor, KeAdilan 2009 Budget & Econ Policy Brief” for more details on this proposal)
KeAdilan has also been clear about its concern regarding the importance of targeting Malaysia’s most vulnerable segments exposed to escalating inflation. The government has not only ignored this problem but by its flip-flopping over the fuel price increases has been the main culprit in the galloping inflation which has hit Malaysia and has most affected the poor.
2.3.3 Meaningless Corporate Sector Initiatives
While the 2009 National Budget has been touted in the mainstream government press as a “business friendly budget”( Star, 30 Aug.), experts have already contradicted that notion. This can be seen in the two page coverage of responses by leading tax experts (from Ernst & Young, PricewaterhouseCoopers, Deloitte and KPMG) acting on behalf of the country’s top businesses and corporate clients. Their verdict was that this is a budget that, whilst not penalizing business, is going to do practically nothing to encourage business. The plan has no substantive initiatives to encourage business big or small, and contains no compelling proposals to improve Malaysia’s competitiveness in the context of the global economic slowdown.
It is not only the tax experts and business consultants that have lost faith in the government’s business policies. Clear evidence can be found in the government’s own data. From table 8.2, Investment in Approved Projects by Industry, it can be seen that there has been a significant reduction in investment of almost all industries this year - most significantly in textiles and textile products; paper, printing and publication; and petroleum products; and electric and electronic products. KeAdilan is concerned that if this trend is allowed to continue, domestic and foreign investment would continue to avoid Malaysia due to the BN government’s continuing failure to develop attractive and meaningful policies, within the context of structural reform, reducing of business costs and to the implementation of improvements in government response and operating efficiency. Without a clear investment and business oriented strategy, BN’s lack of planning would have serious implications for overall economic growth and private-sector employment.
2.3.4 Exaggerated Food Sector Claims and Unsubstantiated Targets
KeAdilan is concerned that the BN government is exaggerating claims and misrepresenting statistics to create a ‘rosy’ picture of its achievements and the economic progress achieved under its administration. One example comes from the food production and padi sector, to which KeAdilan attaches great importance. Firstly the BN 2009 National Budget refers to laying the foundations for achieving 86% self-sufficiency in rice by 2010, from 73% in 2008, through a variety of interventions. This implies an increase in domestic production of 13 % in 2 years, or a compound annual rate of increase of over 6% per year in the two years left. This is an implausible and unachievable target given that since 1980 to the present, despite billions spent on new irrigation system intensification, research, extension services, and allocations to agencies and padi based IADPs, Malaysia has not been able to achieve an annual rate of increase in national padi output even approaching 1%. The reality is that domestic rice production nationally has been flat.
KeAdilan proposes greater research invested to understand why some farmers are able to get yields of around 10 tonnes per hectare, amongst the highest in the world especially in the tropics, and transmit that knowledge and technique to all farmers. This does not require huge expenditure, nor an obsession with large-scale farming and the subsidies the government provides such large-scale farms. Instead it will benefit smaller, lower income farmers, almost all of who are Malay. KeAdilan also proposes further investment to research improvement of hill rice yields in Sarawak and Sabah, as it is possible to obtain up to 5 tonnes per hectare. This will improve food security as well as incomes, and it will also sustain a form of agriculture that is often the most environmentally friendly for the terrain in question.
2.3.5 Opening the Door to Wider Corruption and Abuse
KeAdilan’s concerns do not stop with misleading targets. The concerns are with the BN’s historical practices of spending large sums of scarce public funds on a problem – without proper concern for prudent and responsible spending and a strong commitment to high execution standards and results that merit the expenditure. This has been clear across all the major sectors of government spending. In agriculture and padi we see that what is not specified in the 2009 National Budget document, but included in the lump sum allocations are a number of handout programs which are likely to have the following outcomes:
• Special yield enhancing inputs to be given free, whose efficacy in terms of yield increase is questioned by many parties, but which will enrich suppliers. Hence the scramble now for many UMNO and BN companies to get their products on the favoured list.
• Farm machinery handouts, again immediately benefiting a small group
• Various production incentives in cash but in practice subject to significant abuse in implementation. For example: the yield increase bonus.
These KeAdilan concerns extend equally to many other sectors. For example, in Sarawak, there is a 20% allowance for Sarawak tenders, on top of the 10% allowance for bumiputera, i.e., a total of 30% allowance for those individuals and companies that can claim Sarawak bumiputera status. If the RM3 billion allocated to Sarawak for infrastructure is subject to this, it means that, RM1 billion will immediately have been siphoned into pockets of such companies as CMS and individuals directly associated with key BN political leaders and their families.
In conclusion, the implementation of the BN government’s 2009 Budget Proposals will see the past trend of economic mismanagement and failure to rectify structural weaknesses continue. In its place, KeAdilan proposes a plan of constructive stewardship and good governance of the economy. We will introduce pragmatic but innovative reform policies and programs that will revitalize our economy and make it more resilient to meet the challenging time ahead
3.0 Key KeAdilan Policy Initiatives:
The policy initiatives that comprise KeAdilan’s Malaysian Economic Agenda, will cover the full spectrum of social, political and economic development for Malaysia. The following are examples of specific policies which KeAdilan will implement to spur our economic growth.
3.1 STIMULATING INVESTMENT
Increasing both domestic and foreign investment - the key drivers in Malaysia’s productive growth - is a primary focus of KeAdilan’s policy proposals. Despite strong fundamentals in Malaysia such as high domestic savings, high private consumption and strong domestic demand ithat would be expected to lead to strong and continuous investment flows, FDI is still unimpressive compared to the region and even more domestic capital is flowing out of the country than investment coming in. KeAdilan believes there are fundamental regulatory and business environment factors which must be reformed to truly reach Malaysia’s goals of global competitiveness within the next decade.
First, KeAdilan recommends a shift away from the historic equity restrictions for approved investments, and that the FIC should be retasked to monitor the national distribution of equity under present policy. The foreign share of the national economy has reduced significantly since the NEP (and its consequent policies) and the FIC was introduced. The equity restrictions imposed by FIC are now seen as a barrier to investment while not materially assisting the growth of disadvantaged groups. For example, corporate transactions through mergers and acquisitions when they fall under the Guidelines of the FIC on Take-Overs and Mergers, have to restructure their ownership structure to comply with the NEP (now the NVP). Moving away from equity limitations at the enterprise level will stimulate investment (and FDI) while FIC can act as a facilitator and monitor for participation of disadvantaged groups in macro economic context using incentives to encourage participation rather than restrictive legislation.
Second, KeAdilan proposes that tariffs and other entry barriers need to be eliminated in order to negotiate trade agreements with other ASEAN countries, Japan, the EU and others. To sustain the competitive advantage against especially India, China and Singapore, Malaysia will need to upgrade the educational system to educate and attract high skilled labour in focus sectors, such as engineers, biochemists, industrialized farmers, etc.
3.2 PRODUCTIVE BUSINESS INCENTIVES
KeAdilan believes that reduction in taxes and other levies to the business sector, in the proper environment, will result in increased investment and consequently job growth. Additionally, KeAdilan’s proposals are to focus on key sectors to maximize impact of tax-rebates on industries strategic to Malaysian growth and development. In addition to opportunities to lower the overall business tax burden, we propose to provide more sector- and productivity-driven incentives to increase investment in critical areas and companies. Examples of these policies are:
i. Tax rebates for those who export to a certain level (similar to Chinese initiatives)
ii. Tax rebates or even direct subsidies to encourage efficient and labour intensive operations as well as to provide incentives for companies to migrate to more fuel efficient production methods.
3.3 REFORMING THE PUBLIC TENDER SYSTEM
One of the core pillars of the KeAdilan economic agenda is that all government contracts must be tendered in an open, competitive and transparent manner. Towards this end, the following policies will be implemented by KeAdilan as quickly as possible:
i. All qualified companies shall be provided with equal opportunities to secure Government supply contracts and projects.
ii. To prevent destabilizing disruption to the current system, this policy shall be implemented on a gradual basis, commencing with projects or supply contracts sized above RM10 million for 2009.
iii. In view of the challenges brought by globalization and to honor our international commitments to free trade, all tenders shall be made competitive, open and transparent by 2015.
KeAdilan projects that on the conservative assumption a 10% savings is achieved via the new tendering system, it will generate an absolute savings in excess of RM5 billion per annum as well as bring about quality improvements that are of a large magnitude.
3.4 DOWNWARD ADJUSTMENT OF THE FUEL PRICE
KeAdilan proposes to review the downward adjustment of fuel price so as to reduce growth constraint pressure brought about by the government’s mismanaged and excessive fuel price hike and other inflationary factors in the economy. The downward adjustment will mean lower fuel costs for businesses which will enable them to expand production. Further growth will also come about as a result of the increase in disposable income of the average Malaysian arising from reduced energy related prices. The impact of the oil price adjustment will also result in a stimulation of consumer spending and help moderate the current slowdown in consumer credit growth.
With our proposed downward adjustment of the fuel price, our aim is to reduce inflation to less than 5%
3.5 STRATEGIC PUBLIC TRANSPORT INITIATIVES
KeAdilan considers public transportation infrastructure a priority for investment, and also as a target for major systemic reform. KeAdilan will improve the quality of the nation’s transportation infrastructure by optimizing the development expenditure for the sector. Key attention will be given to the three highly congested urban centres – the Klang Valley, Penang Island and Johor Bahru. A blueprint for a “Klang Valley Circle” rail network will also be developed to improve inter-suburban connectivity, by-passing the congested Kuala Lumpur city centre.
KeAdilan also supports a policy to strengthen and link up the public transportation network nationwide in a manner that revisits Malaysia’s “old” cities such as Ipoh, Seremban, Melaka, and Alor Star and links them with fast rail service.. In addition to attracting foreign and local tourists, the interconnectivity of these cities will foster greater trade and information flows which will positively affect domestic consumption and investment. Finally, improved rail transport opens the path to future re-developments of these older cities in the medium term with less infrastructure costs as compared to current investment in mega-projects including those aimed at creating new cities from nothing. KeAdilan believes Malaysians must think of the public transportation network of the future in terms of the flow of people, investment and business.
3.6 CURBING PUBLIC EXPENDTURE ON MEGA-PROJECTS
Historically, the BN government has had a notorious track record for wasteful and extravagant mega projects that cannot justify close scrutiny. In addition to the aborted RM1.13 billion crooked scenic bridge, a RM9 billion undersea cable-tracking project has also been proposed and there is now a proposal for a RM15.2 billion high speed broadband (HSBB) project to wire up 2.2 million so-called high economic impact premises.
Not many details have been released about the HSBB project since the plan was initially made known by Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak last September. If this latest example of a mega project is approved, the expenditure will cost the public approximately RM 7,000 to wire each premise – a totally unjustifiable sum.
To prevent the likelihood of financially irresponsible mega projects burdening the public, KeAdilan proposes for the current budget year and the remainder of the 9th Malaysia Plan period to undertake a rigorous priority review of all proposed mega projects costing RM1B upwards and to assess their socio-economic viability, affordability and intended impact on national development. This review will be conducted as transparently as possible and will include the use of independent and credible professional bodies and individuals.
The strict adherence to higher standards of fiscal prudence by the KeAdilan government – beginning initially with mega projects and to be extended to all new projects - will prevent public funds from being wasted or hijacked by political cronies of the BN. It will also enable the savings to be channeled towards programmes bringing higher returns for the public, including those specifically aimed at helping low and middle income earners.
3.7 REFORMING THE CURRENT SYSTEM OF AWARD of AP’s
KeAdilan proposes as a part of our new sources of revenue, as well as to negate the rent-seeking culture, that the approved permits (APs) currently issued for free by the Ministry of International Trade & Industry to a select pool of “businessman” shall be auctioned to the highest bidders. Based on an estimated 70,000 APs issued per annum and a conservative RM25,000 market price, the auction will provide an additional RM1.75 billion to government coffers.
3.8 ADDITIONAL MEDIUM TERM PROPOSALS
KeAdilan’s additional medium term proposals are focused on the BN inititiated policies that KeAdilan believes must be changed or abandoned for good as well as on the new policies that need to be put in place in order to raise the Malaysian economy to a higher level and to realize the full potential of Malaysia’s diverse human resources and geographical regions. These proposals are also based on the removal or liberalization of archaic or self defeating entry barriers that stand in the way of ensuring sustainability and improving growth in the various sectors to benefit all Malaysians. Finally, they are based on taking the country’s economy forward in meeting the unprecedented challenge from other regional and global players and in coping with the more uncertain and rapidly changing external economic environment.
More details on these will be released shortly in the full publication of Pakatan Rakyat’s Malaysian Economic Agenda.
Salam DSAI..
We all agree and support your reformation for Malaysia
impressive!
Besides the poor and underprivileged and all of the above,DSAI please don’t forget the education and public transport systems. God bless all of you!!~
Opposition should do something to strike nowdays goverment. All the citizens waiting for new goverment by PR. Don’nt make the peoples dissapointed.
KALAU DAH ADE BAJET SENDIRI NAK TUNGGU APE LAGI? CEPAT2 LA AMBIL ALIH KERAJAAN NIH. KEADAAN DAH MAKIN PARAH. EKONOMI SEMAKIN MENJUNAM. MAKIN RAMAI LA YANG KENA PENYAKIT DARAH TINGGI DAN TEKANAN PERASAAN…
DSAI tolong terjemah dalam Bahasa Malaysia supaya semua orang tahu dan faham terutamanya golongan akar umbi. Macam ini baru dikatakan kerajaan berwawasan. Kami tunggu 16 sept ini dengan penuh yakin.
CHANGE Reply:
September 3rd, 2008 at 5:41 pm
Yer..sokong Muttalib tolong terjemahkan ke Bahasa Malaysia..
As one of GLC vendor unde downstream sector, we did not see any benefits to our business. Eg. Petronas whom use to buy goods which are from very high quality brand, in order for us to sell the goods to Petronas we need to buy those item from overseas. Whereby most of the items is industrial items and high taxes have been imposed to those items. Why govenment impose very high tax from 30% - 40%, how we able to compete in the bidding where our margin is around 10 to 25% before the custom tax. Sometimes We not able to know whether the items is taxable or not because it depend on the custom checking at the border.
We are only small companies downstream bumiputra vendor, but the upperstream they can put whatever price and they will get the contract with very high profit margin.
Why Government doing this policies - menganaktirikan vendor2 kecil Petronas.
Mengapa cukai yang tinggi perlu dikenakan terhadap barang2 terutamanya utk industri minyak dan gas? Petronas hanya akan membeli jika margin didalam setiap bidding tidak lebih dari 25%. Jika cukai kastam dikenakan 30% dimanakah untung kita?
Di dalam budget 2009 PM tidak pun menyebut tentang pengurangan cukai brg industri minyak dan gas sedangkan di tahu jika cukai yang rendah dikenakan atau tidak dikenakan cukai bagi barang2 industri minyak dan gas, Petronas akan mendapat keuntungan lebih tinggi kerana dapat mengurangkan kos pembelian barang2 tersebut dan vendor2 kecil spt kami tidak akan dizalimi dan tidak perlu memberi wang saguhati kepada kastam disempadan Singapura yg diberi oleh sykt2 transportation… Rasuah dapat dibendung…..Vendor Kecil dapat manfaat… Petronas dan lain2 Sykt Minyak Gergasi juga akan dapat jimatkan kos. Keuntungan Vendor2 kecil akan bertambah dan dapat menyumbang kepada negara….
As one of GLC vendor unde downstream sector, we did not see any benefits to our business. Eg. Petronas whom use to buy goods which are from very high quality brand, in order for us to sell the goods to Petronas we need to buy those item from overseas. Whereby most of the items is industrial items and high taxes have been imposed to those items. Why govenment impose very high tax from 30% - 40%, how we able to compete in the bidding where our margin is around 10 to 25% before the custom tax. Sometimes We not able to know whether the items is taxable or not because it depend on the custom checking at the border.
We are only small companies downstream bumiputra vendor, but the upperstream they can put whatever price and they will get the contract with very high profit margin.
Why Government doing this policies - menganaktirikan vendor2 kecil Petronas.
Mengapa cukai yang tinggi perlu dikenakan terhadap barang2 terutamanya utk industri minyak dan gas? Petronas hanya akan membeli jika margin didalam setiap bidding tidak lebih dari 25%. Jika cukai kastam dikenakan 30% dimanakah untung kita?
Di dalam budget 2009 PM tidak pun menyebut tentang pengurangan cukai brg industri minyak dan gas sedangkan di tahu jika cukai yang rendah dikenakan atau tidak dikenakan cukai bagi barang2 industri minyak dan gas, Petronas akan mendapat keuntungan lebih tinggi kerana dapat mengurangkan kos pembelian barang2 tersebut dan vendor2 kecil spt kami tidak akan dizalimi dan tidak perlu memberi wang saguhati kepada kastam disempadan Singapura yg diberi oleh sykt2 transportation… Rasuah dapat dibendung…..Vendor Kecil dapat manfaat… Petronas dan lain2 Sykt Minyak Gergasi juga akan dapat jimatkan kos. Keuntungan Vendor2 kecil akan bertambah dan dapat menyumbang kepada negara….
layman Reply:
September 3rd, 2008 at 2:20 pm
Nak tanya sikit, senang ker nak mohon/memperbaharui Lesen Petronas sekarang nie?
abu Reply:
September 3rd, 2008 at 9:24 pm
bang, english bersepah la bang. ini direct translation nih hence the meaning is lost in translation. cuba explain balik dlm simple english, kalau tak melayu pon ok.
It is so obvious that the budget is politically motivated. It is like throwing a bucket of water
on top of a tree and little water (benefit) is left for the people at the bottom. I am suspicious of this UMNO led govt’s overspent budget, perhaps, in anticipation of an early PKR take over…leaving the govt coffer to zero level, maybe, even in deep RED.
PKR’s plan is more sound and productive. Investments on Education, Health, Transport and Trade are the right direction to take. Future generations must be given first preference to benefit these investments. The abuses brought about by the present govt has made the nation, economically weak and unstable. If not corrected in time, we will be facing for hard times ahead!
Moga apa yang dicadangkan jadi kenyataan dimana rakyat hidup aman makmur dan Malaysia terus maju di bawah PR. Jangan lupa rasmikan PR sebagai suatu gagasan yang benar-benar bersatu.
How about increasing the indicidual disposal income through:-
- increase Personal Relief to RM10,000
- EPF from RM6,000 to RM10,000
- child relief to RM5,000
- increase the taxable band
- reduce the tax rate further, a mere 1% reduction is actually adding insult to the intelligent of its citizen
bravo DSAI!!
truly a better budget for all malaysian!
Great work DSAI.
I did not read fully what you have written. But I beleive in you making good for the rakyat and the country.
Must kick these BN bums hard on the butt to work all of them up from their slumber like our sleepy, flipflop guy.
Well Done DSAI!
Government should spend wisely:
1.to repair the attractions for more FDI & to promote domestic investment.
2.to increase the country’s competitiveness
3.to improve the quantity of Rakyat thru quality education system.
No more non-productive fancy & expensive projects.
—————-
Japan is rich because of the exports.
China is getting richer now than before because of many countries are ‘pouring’ in FDI and China’s exports is the top in the world.
Singapore is rich because of it’s wise spending to attract FDI.
Korean is also getting richer because of the exports too. ( look at KIA, SAMSUNG..)
Look at current Malaysia, i would say it’s in a scary condition now indeed………
DSAI,
Dollah simply read a long speech and he doesn’t understand what he was saying, after all, his economy is zilch. So, the BN media wrote fluttery comments to lull him and that has been the hallmark of his leadership. Help!
Kami berharap DSAI dapat menjadi pemimpin kami yang boleh dipercayai. Penyelewengan kerajaan BN yang zalim tidak terperi banyaknya e.g penangkapan ahli ahli parlimen di Lobi parlimen malaysia, antara kekurang ajaran pemimpin BN.
Kami minta supaya segala kezaliman kerajaan BN termasuk adanya pembunuhan yang berlaku disebabkan politik, penangkapan aktivis-aktivis politik dalam memperjuangkan nasib rakyat disiarkan di dalam akhbar harakah (jika boleh),akhbar suara keadilan, tv pas.com, malaysiakini.net dan seterusnya dibukukan supaya maklumat kezaliman dan penindasan oleh kerajaan BN dapat diperolehi oleh semua rakyat jelata.
sedarlah rakyat Malaysia, kezaliman dan penindasan ini berlaku selepas 51 tahun kita merdeka, jika kita tidak menyokong 16 september, selama-lamanya kita akan tertindas dengan pimpinan korup UMNO_BN
sekian
Now that’s what we so called National Budget and Economic Policy. Although it is just a proposal, it has been telling the big picture of current situation that Malaysian mostly experiencing.
Without proper planning of big project as well as transparence of the process of tender, it hardly being emphasis that the current BN government is doing what they are saying to the public.
Although we cannot forsee that how are PKR actually can run what they promised, but at least, give them a chance to replace the current government by swapping out those corrupted officers in the related office.
The latest Government National Budget cannot benefit the pivate sector. The 1% reduct on Income Tax will not help much compare inflation. What we can analyze is that only the government servant will benifit the most out of it. Frankly speaking, without the push of private sector, the government will not increase their tax income. What they did to the private sector is destruction and no intention to rebuild the confident of the foreign investors.
tahniah,satu tindakan pro aktif
Salam DSAI,
Saya setuju dgn berberapa perkara terutama dalam pemberian AP. Sepatutnya kita jual min RM25k, jadi sesiapa pun oleh beli.
RM15.2B utk HSBB mmg keterlalauan, ada bumiputra yg saya yau buat WiFi di kampus utk 500 orang dgn kos bwh RM30K jer.
Pengangkutan pula - saya cadang kita buat sistem yg maju mcm di Eropah, walaupun mereka maju, train adalah pengangutan utama. LRT mereka 10-12 gerabak, setiap 5 min. Bas siap ada GPS, bila kita kat bus stop kita tau bila bas kita akan sampai. Singapore pun ada. Mungkin kos permulaan tinggi, tetapi hanya sekali.
Cadagan saya:
1. Guna Dinar Emas, walaupun susah cuba juga. Mula dgn negara Asean kemudian OIC.
2. Promosi pelancongan dgn lebih efektif. Kita juga ada menara condong!!! Night Safari di S’pore
org datang berduyun-duyun, walaupun lebih 60% binatang tu asal dari Malaysia. Tiket SGD22.
3. Cuma bagaimana kita nak pastikan semua tiada rasuah dan tender terbuka berjalan dgn ADIL?
wasalam
Muhd Ali Abd Rahman Reply:
September 2nd, 2008 at 10:06 pm
RM25K terlalu murah…itukan keperluan prang kaya…letak ja lah RM75K….baru ngam..
Ex-Toray Group Reply:
September 3rd, 2008 at 11:25 am
Lepas tu yg bleh beli AP tu smua bkan Melayu… Melayu makin susah. Bangsa len makin senang. Kerja utk orang Melayu cuma kerani, cuci sampah. Bangsa len jadi supervisor, manager, psai Tokei AP bukan bangsa melayu… Cuba perati bhg Akaun utk setiap Compeni Asing/Bangsa len…? Ada orang melayu jadi manager..? Cuma GLC & Sykt Melayu saja ada Manager Melayu…
abu Reply:
September 3rd, 2008 at 9:22 pm
aku pn ada gak nampak mcm bangsa lain yg konker sesetengah dept. pastu bile aku interview yg tak naik pangkat, kebanyakannya buat keje bare minimum. yg naik pangkat, semua buat keje gila2. so, aku tnya diorg balik, kalau usaha tak ke mana, patut ke dia dpt naik pangkat? kalau tak berkelayakan, patut ke dpt position? tepuk dada tanya diri sendiri
Muhd Ali Abd Rahman Reply:
September 4th, 2008 at 12:21 am
nak buat macam mana lagi….dah PR kata rakyat malaysia nak kan perubahan…..semua bangsa sama rata…agama sama taraf…kebebasan mutlak…itukan perjuangan anwar…kalau dah itu yang rakyat nak….bagi ja lah….rasa dulu baru tau masin kah manis…….antara yang mempertikaikan kuasa mahkamah syariah kan ada kat dalam PKr dan DAP……so tibai ja lah…..aiman tak kisah….tukar kerajaan macam mana rupa sekalipun…tak ada maknanya…2 x 5…..cuma mungkin nilai 5 tu lebih besar lah…besar pahit atau besar manisnya…..atau naka bagi adil…..AP beri percuma kepada setiap rakyat yang nak…tak ada saingan…sama rata…tak ada bising-bising…hehehehe..tak adalah yang ambil kesempatan dalam kesempitan rakyat……..
Kalau ada kerajaan yang sanggup beri percuma semua nya….kerajaan ni akan bertahan sampai kiamat……..
Dr Fulus Reply:
September 4th, 2008 at 7:42 am
Prihatinnya anda dgn kedudukan Melayu, tapi dgn dasar AP sekarang, brp byk Melayu yg mampu pakai kereta mewah? Sebenarnya macam ni, at least dgn jual AP, kerajaan dpt sumber pendapatan, agihan AP adil menurut keupayaan membayar. Sekarang ni pemberian AP adalah berasaskan discretionary pihak pemerintah ajer….so mana lebih baik? Ada individu yg dapat 12 000 AP setahun…..org lain dapat apa? Lepas tu jual dgn harga yg mahal, yg kaya mereka dan keluarga mereka…. Melayu lain macam mana?
Melayu bukan makin susah, tp malas nak berfikir dan tak nak berubah, itu aja. Ramai gak Melayu yg kaya, tak payah harap AP pun…..Byk gak Melayu yg bukan setakat jd manager tp mampu gajikan manager….
fibre glass Reply:
September 4th, 2008 at 11:58 am
Salam,
Eh kau lagi muhd ali, punya la ramai rakyat malaysia nie, asyik2 kau je bagi komen.. klu komen bernas takpe gak… nie ntah apa2 ntah..
bodoh Reply:
September 7th, 2008 at 1:39 pm
apani makin susah?Wahai bangsa Melayu pls wake up? Masa dah sampai la …. tiap tiap hari nak ibu suap ka? Bila baru boleh putus susu?Lu ingat dunia boleh tunggu kamu seorang? Technologi pusing cepat, China ,vietnam, India dan negara Arab dah mula bersaing la …. Kamu lagi ingat 20 tahun yang lalu ?Mimpi la …. Malaysia bukan lagi negara yang terpilih untuk orang asing untuk BERLABUR. Siapa nak datang ke Malaysia untuk berlabur?Jika nak ambil pekerja yang malas,mahal dan bodoh?
saya amat gembira setelah diketahui datuk menang dalam pilihanraya yang lepas di permatang pauh. saya bukan ahli politik maka saya tidak tahu apakah ertinya pemenangan yang tersebut bagi Pakatan rakyat, tetapi sebagai salah seorang warganegara yang berkaum cina di tanah ini , saya amat berharap agar adanya perubahan yang jelas pada 16 september 2008.
sekian lama ini, sedangkan kaum cina dan india , bahkan orang melayu di tanah air ini juga menghadapi ketidakadilan daripada ahli-ahli politk yang kuat memenggang kuasa. mereka ibarat senantiasa membenarkan orang - orang bawahnya membuat apa saja yang disukainya tanpa memikirkan kebajikan yang harus dinikmati oleh semua warga. saya rasa saya tidak perlu mengulang lagi pelbagai masalah yang nyata timbul dan dilihat di mana-mana media.
saya amat berharap agar datuk boleh memperkotakan kata-kata datuk iaitu mengambilalih kuasa daripada pihak yang kini menguasai. setelah itu , jangan juga lupa membuat apa yang harus dan sepatutnya demi semua warganegara malaysia.
walaupun dahulu nenek moyang kaum india dan cina memang datang dari negara lain. tetapi bagi generasi kami ini yang dilahirkan di tanah ini, yang telah mendapat kad pengenalan yang dicatat dengan warganegara Malaysia, bukan lagi penduduk asing. Kebanyakan kami telah menjadikan Malaysia sebagai tanah air kami kerana sejak kecil kami telah berada di sini , mendapat pelajaran di sini, dan juga diasuh membalas budi kepada negara setelah dewasa. malangnya kaum lain daripada melayu sering dikatakan penduduk asing. amat mendukakan hati kaum bukan melayu.
saya telah menggunakan identiti yang sebenarnya , saya tidak tahu ,kata-kata says di sini mungkinkah menyebabkan saya dipenjara. saya cuma berharap agar pihak yang berkenaan cuba mengetahui kehendak bisik hati kaum bukan melayu.
demi negara , demi rakyat. harap semua berpakat.
X-Men Reply:
September 2nd, 2008 at 8:27 pm
Saudara. benar kata2 saudara itu.. orang malayu adalah tuan disini sesuatu perkara yang tak boleh diubah lagi. Sdr bernasib baik kerana orang Melayu murah hati berkongsi kemewahan bumi ini dgn orang yang bukan keturunan Melayu, malah orang bukan Melayu pula menjadi tuan kepada orang Melayu dan orang Melayu miskin, orang bukan Melayu kaya raya. Tak mengapa, kami orang Melayu tak marah sangat. Kalau bukan kerana Melayu mungkin nasib sdr spt rakyat Bosnia, orang serb tak boleh terjemah masyarakat majmuk dlm hidup mereka, lebih2 lagi orang Islam. Oleh itu berlaku penghapusan etnik. Tetapi orang Melayu tak begitu. yang membezakan ialah ISLAM. Islam bukan milik orang Melayu, bukan milik Arab, bahkan ia milik seluruh umat manusia, dalam ISLAM tak ada perbezaan warna kulit (lihatlah apa yg orang Amerika pandang pd orang kulit hitam disana).. kerana itu di anggap semua orang ISALAM bersaudara tak kira apa bangsa dia, keturunan dia dan dari mana dia datang. Itulah ajaran Islam yang disempurnakan oleh Rasul terakhir Nabi Muhammad s.a.w. Bagi saya orang Cina, India, Melayu, kadazan, orang putih orang hitam, orang kelabu dll. semuanya sama disisi Allah. Allah jadikan banyak kaum keturunan itu adalah untuk manusia berkongsi keindahan kehidupan ini sesama manusia.. Justeru itu saudara dekatilah orang Islam tulin (tak kira bangsa apa dia) dan saudara akan dapati keindahan yang tak dapat saudara gambarkan dalam hidup ini. Kemanisan iman dan kemuliaannya. Hanya Allah yang tahu. Wasallam (wqy3955@yahoo.com)
abu Reply:
September 2nd, 2008 at 10:37 pm
setuju gak tuh. nak tanya, siapa yang sebenar-benarnya melayu? bapak syed hamid albar datang tahun 30an dan settle kt malaya. hamid adala generasi pertama dilahirkn di malaysia. khir toyo bapak dia jawa, datang dari tanah jawa, pastu dapat kerakyatan. baba dan nyonya lagi lama dari sesetengah melayu tp tak dpt hak keistimewaan. bapak dolah badawi cina, tp dpt kerakyatan walaupun ada cina lagi lama dr bapak dia tak dpt kerakyatan. so skrg, siapa yang sebenar-benarnya melayu nih? melayu mana yg kita bole konfem dtg kt msia lagi lama dari 500 tahun? aku org bugis, nenek moyang aku bukak daerah linggi. so, aku rase bole la di tabalkn sebagai melayu. tp, hamid, khir toyo, syarizat tu nak campak mane? org jawa kt johor tu baru duduk 40-50 tahun dpt bumi status. aku tak suka. so, will the real melayu please stand up? pada aku, jgn lah jadikn sebab melayu mereka patut dpt lebih dr org bukan melayu. sama2lah kita usaha untuk menjadikan diri kita lebih baik. ada org melayu sbg pemerintah pon keje mentengkedarah duit rakyat. so mcm mana nih?
Am Reply:
September 3rd, 2008 at 9:25 am
aku setuju. pada aku, sebenarnya hak keistimewaan sesuatu bangsa itu dihapuskan. yang ada hanyalah keistimewaan rakyat malaysia. walaupun aku melayu, tp aku rasakan yg melayu tidak layak utk dapatkan hak yg lebih drpd kaum2 lain. apa bezanya bangsa lain? mereka juga rakyat malaysia. lahir sama2 di malaysia. sblm mereka lahir, mereka tidak diberi peluang utk memilih bangsa apa yang mereka hendak, negara mana yg mereka hendak. mereka hnya lahir sebagai rakyat malaysia. serupa dgn bangsa melayu. hanya kerana melayu bertuah dilahirkan sbg melayu di negara melayu, tidak bermakna melayu blh dpt hak keistimewaan lain daripada yg lain.
dlm membentuk masyarakat majmuk dlm satu negara, keistimewaan sesuatu bangsa itu harus dihapuskan. semua bangsa adalah sama taraf. yg membezakan adalah agama.
irKupa Reply:
September 3rd, 2008 at 4:30 pm
mmg ade kbenarannye pasal hak melayu…tp aku sbg melayu, tanah ni semestinye ade kaitan ngn asal keturunan kite. mmg ade hak melayu boleh di haposkan, tp BUKAN SEMUA..FAHAMMM…!!! mmg kne ade sikit prasaan mcm tu. Tgk Singapore ape jadik? Ade ke Menteri mElayu? ade ke Melayu pegang tentera? Jawab la kalo bijak sgt..
anak2nya Reply:
September 4th, 2008 at 2:51 pm
adakalanya ada yg bukan melayu lebih bersikap “melayu” dari org melayu sendiri…
jangan sesat memakmurkan bangsa sehingga melebihi dari agama makmur.
Ahli koprat melayu segelintir tak kurang dari darah biru gah bergelar “socialite” bangga dijadikan contoh “melayu” yang berjaya tapi imannya berkiblatkan mini-bar di ruang tamu rumah agam di celah bukit…pengalaman yg sukar utk ku lupakan…
orang asli pastinya lebih “melayu” dari org melayu kalau nak dibandingkan sapa sampai dulu kat tanah malaysia ni…bukankah org melayu patut berterima kasih kepada orang asli yg tak sampai hati me-nyumpit keluar org2 pendatang dari tanah seberang..
abu Reply:
September 4th, 2008 at 5:54 pm
actually menteri melayu kt singapore ada la. menteri air dia melayu apa. tgk yusof ishak, presiden singapura pertama. cari menteri melayu kt spore pastu kau compare dgn menteri paling bijak kt msia, gerenti kau terkujat. pada aku, melayu kt spore bukan dipinggirkan, cuma diorg tak cukup bagus je. aku tak kate takde racism. mmg ada, tp 70%nye sbb diorg tak cukup bagus, itu aje. btul apa kau ckp tuh, sesetengahnye mmg ada racist. contohnya pm dia yg skrg claim, kt spore takkan ada tentera pangkat besar melayu kerana takut kesetiaan diorg berbelah bagi. cuma, aku rase kita takut tak bertempat. msia bukan spore. org cina kt msia, lagi rendah diri dr org cina kt spore. apa yg penting skrg, kita jgn mengamalkn dasar perkauman yang merugikn negara kita.
aku rase, dlm umno dlm mane2 pon, ada je org melayu yg berkebolehan. yg berkemampuan, tp perasan tak dlm politik umno, ramai sebut pasal politik cantas-mencantas? baca tak mastika bulan mac/april? salah satu artikel ada tok mat, dia kte org umno/melayu ni suke dengki-mendengki. tak boleh kalau org lebih dr kita sikit. so, tutup periuk nasi org. aku rase, kalau melayu rugi bukan sebab bangsa lain tekan kita, tp sbb sifat kita sendiri yg suke memperbodohkan diri sendiri.
Muhd Ali Abd Rahman Reply:
September 4th, 2008 at 1:19 am
Ya amatlah betul tu…tersangat lah betu….dan jawatan PM tak semestinya melayu kalau PR memerintah,,,,,,tak semestinya melayu ialam……ni negara semua rakyat..ketuanan rakyat…Lim Kit Siang patut jadi PM….dia lebih lama dan berpengalaman dan konsisten dalam mengktitik kerajaan…dia tak lompat masuk dan keluar…jadi dia lebih jujur tau…dai patut jadi PM….timbalan PM biar yang [embangkang junior pegang pun kira ok lah..jaga hati….
Salam DSAI…Kami menantikan sesuatu dari DSAI..PLs buktikan demi menyelamat anak cucu kami. Saya ucapkan selamat berjaya kepada DSAI dan terus berjaya (sekiranya DSAI ikhlas dalam perjuangan. Saya doakan DSAI dapat mengubah senario politik Malaysia agar menjadi lebih makmur.
Tidak boleh sangkal kewibawaan Datuk seri Anwar Ibrahim dalam kepakaranya mengendalikan mikro dan makro ekonomi negara. Rakyat masih lagi merindui pembentangan bajet semasa beliau menjadi menteri kewangan Malaysia dahulu. Sungguh menakjubkan , beliau juga pernah menaikan harga barang secara mendadak pada ketika itu. Tetapi kenaikan harga itu langsung tidak menggigit jari golongan miskin dan sederhana. Contohnya, beliau menaikan harga pasport antarabangsa dari RM 60 ke RM 300. Beliau tidak gentar dengan kenaikan itu dengan alasan golongan yang bertandan ke luar negara mampu membayar RM 300. Ini tidak menyakitkan rakyat yang serba kekurangan. DSAI yang memberi satu identiti untuk ringgit malaysia sebagai RM yang sebelum itu kita menumpang $ (dollar sighn). Beliau yang mengurangkan pendapatan agen insurans yang tamak memakan komisen yang berlebihan dari rakyat jelata. beliau yang mainkan perananya dalam penghapusan cukai mengimport buku dan bahan ilmu. banyak lagi kita boleh mengimbas kembali pada pembentangan belanjawan Anwar IBrahim.
farith Reply:
September 2nd, 2008 at 7:43 pm
serious bro?baru saya tau..cuba ceritakan lagi jasa2 ds anwar dulu..
Kepalai Reply:
September 2nd, 2008 at 11:08 pm
Kalau ada lagi, sila list kan, supaya kawan2 saya lebih kenal DSAI, maklumlah BN terlalu momokkan keburukan sahaja..
Muhd Ali Abd Rahman Reply:
September 4th, 2008 at 1:14 am
ya betul…kasi banyak-banyak…..kalau boleh tambah…tambaah dan ubahsuai…asal nampak hebat…baru ngam mau buat promosi….
An excellent budget. The new government should also emphasize on new generation by providing them comprehensive education which covers all aspect of human needs; material as well as spiritual. especially for Muslim, their new generation seems to be left behind in term of competitiveness and the absent of good ethics(Al-Akhlaq). The BN government; especially UMNO, failed to improve the new generation, instead they made new generation worsen and somehow Malay new generation valueless.
I would suggest that the new government should appoint new people which has good brain to lead the country. However, experienced generation should be advisory council which serve to correct the government. Otherwise, the same problem will be repeated. “Learn from the mistake”
Dato’ Seri, apabila berkuasa nanti jangan lupa pastikan Melayu adalah tuan kepada negara ini dan jangan sesekali agama islam itu dibiar dicabar sewenangnya sensitivitifnya…sebab di situlah pada pendapat saya yang kerdil ini terletaknya survival saudara……
Terlebih dahulu saya ingin mengucapkan tahniah pada Dato Seri atas kembalinya ke Parlimen.
Polisi yg diutarakan oleh Dato Seri amat baik sekali…
saya cuma ingin memohon jasa baik dato seri utk turut mempertimbangkan peruntukan buat orang kurang upaya, penambahan peruntukan untuk kempen kesihatan mental (sekrg ini ramai org sakit mental akibat tekanan), insentif utk keluarga yg ada ahli keluarga menghidap terminal illness, sakit jiwa, kurang upaya.
Berhubung dgn pengangkutan awam, mohon dapat lebihkan kemudahan utk OKU agar mereka dapat naik pengangkutan awam. Begitu juga kemudahan awam yg lain. Sekian lama BN gagal menyelesaikan masalah ini. Semua pembangunan baru perlu diinkoporasikan nilai2 mesra OKU.
Pendidikan - saya harap sangat agar pendidikan negara kembali berteraskan nilai murni dan agama (penerapan nilai murni merentasi kurukulum dan penerapan nilai islam) sbgmana yg Dato seri buat dulu masa jadi menteri pendidikan.
sekian dulu… buat masa ini. InsyaAllah lain masa akan saya sumbangkan lagi idea saya yg tak seberapa ini, mana lah tau mungkin ada manfaatnya…
terima kasih.
Wow looks good..
hidup dsai….
cepat pergi putrajaya…
It is so good to be able to read of PKR’s view on the current budget by the government and presenting an alternate, and better economic policy to counter it. In this respect, the people can compare both policies and decide which one is better, though the policies presented are in general.
Good points on foreign direct investment (FDI), and having more foreign investors would only make us more competitive in this new era. No more hiding in our own cocoon; we need to compete on an equal terms with the rest of the world now.
The development of public transport system is a of utmost importance. Every developed nation has an efficient public transport system, think of Japan, Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Europe and US. So, how could our country become a developed nation without a good transportation system? It makes good economic sense because transportation is one of the key economic impeus for growth beside utilities and communications.
Yes, curb the excessive mega-projects which do nothing to enhance the peoples’ quality of life and spend more on the basics like education, healthcare, and welfare for the hardcore poor. Give all of us equality of opportunities in life. This is the sign of a good government.
God bless.
In my opinion….this is a far better budget than the official one…..It seems that we have no choice…..than to get DSAI to be in power for the sake of our country and people.
Syabas. It’s indeed a good proposal !
Info yang menarik…
—
sertai debat dan hujah di:
http://malaysiachannelnews.blogspot.com/
Debat dan hujah hangat di
http://malaysiachannelnews.blogspot.com/
Change 08 Reply:
September 2nd, 2008 at 8:36 pm
MCN ini tersangatlah ketinggalan zaman dan masih lagi tidak meneliti, mengkaji dan membuat keputusan yang cemerlang. Sudah terang lagi bersuluh terdapat banyak sangat perbezaan kebaikan yang hendak dibawa oleh DSAI. Kita harus memberi peluang kepada beliau dan PR untuk membuat perubahan secepat mungkin.
Sejarah semasa DSAI menjadi Timbalan PM dan Pemangku PM dahulu walaupun sebentar, beliau telah mencuba secepat mungkin melakukan perubahan untuk kepentingan rakyat seperti rumah rakyat dll. Kita melihat hanya beliau seorang sahaja yang bersungguh-sungguh bekerja untuk rakyat. Kes beliau dipenjara pun memang sudah jelas lagi nyata untuk memastikan orang yang bekerja dengan betul harus dihapuskan.
Kepincangan kerajaan sekarang ini bukan sahaja menular diperingkat atasan malah sehingga ke akar umbi kerana telah menjadi suatu budaya. Rasuah amat mendukacitakan. Sampai ke tahap ramai oarang melayu yang tidak mahu membuat perniagaan semata-mata tidak mahu terlibat langsung dengan rasuah kecuali perniagaan yang tidak melibatkan kerajaan. Bagaimana kita boleh maju jika ini telah termasuk ke dalam sistem ekonomi kita.
Semua kepincangan ini perlu dihentikan dengan segera. Marilah kita fikirkan dan buat perubahan dengan segera kerana kita kena berubah sebelum sumber minyak negara kita habis. Pada pandangan peribadi saya asas ekonomi Malaysia sekarang ini amat bergantung kepada Industri minyak mentah. Kita tidak mempunyai kekuatan produk industri sendiri, sumber pertanian yang mengayakan, sumber tenaga intelek yang kukuh, tenaga pakar yang mencukupi, ahli pemikir ekonomi antaranbangsa yang membanggakan sebagaimana Singapura yang mengawal ‘International Trading di wilayah Asia Pacifik’ dan keseluruhannya kita masih belum menemui sesuatu yang kukuh untuk mamastikan ekonomi dan generasi kita sekarang ini mampu untuk dipertahankan dan diturunkan kepada generasi akan datang. Apa yang kita lihat sekarang ini ianya hanya menuju ke arah kita meninggalkan bebanan yang amat tinggi dan mungkin ke peringkat malapetaka buat generasi anak, cucu dan cicit kita kelak.
Maka, marilah kita semua gunakan pemikiran yang dikurniakan Allah swt. ini dengan sebaik-baiknya dan mulakan langkah merubah pemikiran kerana ‘when we change our thinking, then we change our belief, when we change our belief then we change our expectation, when we change our expectation then we change our attitude, when we change our attitude then we change our behaviour, when we change our behaviour, we change our performance and when we change our performance then we could change our life…
So, all Malaysians, its not easy to change our life its must come from our mind. What BN or UMNO did now was at the first step for us to change, they already stop our mind, they don’t even the peoples to think to change by higlighting various issues which could make peoples forget about even mind change. So, everybody please change our thinking first which DSAI could make this change for all of us to follow. We can’t depend on the current corrupt and unprofessional peoples (old thinking) to manage this nation. We have give enought time for them and now its too long for them and even they could’t make any change even for our positive thingking, not to say to change our whole life.
Remember, to change our life are not easy but we all must start to change our thinking…
Good luck to all Malaysians…
good brief ! hope the lompatan really happen not only dream
good brief ! sound good , hopefully the ‘lompat’ is really happen not only dreaming
abu Reply:
September 3rd, 2008 at 9:26 pm
correction: hopefully the lompat will become a reality instead of a dream. english kene kasi betul sikit lah. malu orang lain baca macam ayat tergantung billboard you can do!
As a member of the malaysian youth, I am very interested to experience the new implementations, particularly to public transaportation improvements and educational opportunities.
Honestly, I have no clue as to what direction the current ruling government is heading to, besides the constant promises of corrections that are far from reaching reality. I feel the BN led government lacks the expertise to move forward, and needs a jolt out of the comfort zone.
I support PKR’s brief manifesto and hope to see this becoming a reality very very soon.
Thank you.
I support PKR’s brief manifesto, and hope to see this becoming a reality very very soon.
Thank you.
KEPINCANGAN EKONOMI ITU MASALAH. IA MEMUDHARATKAN, MENJADI BEBANAN KEPADA RAKYAT. PORAK-PERANDA INI BUKAN CIPTAAN RAKYAT TAPI KELALAIAN PEMERINTAH. MAKA, KENAPA RAKYAT PERLU MENANGGUNG BEBAN KESILAPAN PEMERINTAH ? DAN MENGAPA UKURAN MARUAH TIDAK DAPAT MENGAJAR PEMERINTAH UNTUK AKUR KESALAHAN DIRI. ENGGAN BERUNDUR JIKA GAGAL. INI SOAL MARUAH DIRI, MARUAH BANGSA DAN MARUAH NEGARA.
APAKAH ANDA BOLEH BERLEPAS TANGAN DENGAN GIMIK WANG RINGGIT YANG DIGULA-GULA ?
SAYA RAKYAT BIASA. TIDAK MENAGIH-NAGIH ATAS KEHENDAK ! MESKI JENUH KEPERLUAN DIRI DAN ANAK ISTERI. SEBAHAGIAN LUARAN, DI LUAR KEMAMPUAN DIRI. KAMI MENGHARAPKAN KEADILAN DALAM PEMBAHAGIAN, KEAMANAN DALAM KEHIDUPAN SERTA JAMINAN DALAM KESELAMATAN !KERANA KAMU YANG MENAGIH SUMPAH. KERANA KAMU YANG MEMOHON AMANAH !
LLU, APAKAH DENGAN KAMI BERSUARA MAKA KAMI DISISIH. DAN APABILA KAMI MENAGIH MAKA TERSISIH ! SIAPAKAH ANDA DAN KAMI DI SINI. TETAP BERDIRI DENGAN CITA-CITA. MAHU TERUS MAJU DAN TETAP BERSAMA. BERSATU KITA UNTUK SEMUA !
- SUARA HATI SEORANG RAKYAT BIASA !-
Assalamualaikum DSAI, saya ingin memohon jasa baik DSAI untuk memaklumkan kepada Ketua Menteri Pulau Pinang dan Timbalannya supaya datang melihat masalah banjir yang kerap berlaku apabila hujan lebat dekat Kg. Dodol, Jalan P. Ramlee dalam kawasan Jalan Perak Pulau Pinang. Saya amat berharap DSAI dapat meminta Ketua menteri atau Timbalannya mengambil peduli kawasan tersebut…..kasihanilah warga kita kat situ…..mereka merasai kesulitan dah lama…..kami mengharapkan jasa baik kerajaan pakatan rakyat….cadangan saya minta pihak berkenaan dalamkan sungai kat situ…..sekian terima kasih DSAI bakal perdana menteri malaysia yang prihatin….semoga berjaya 16 sept ni…..Takbir!!!
Muhd Ali Abd Rahman Reply:
September 4th, 2008 at 1:09 am
kita dah kata dah….sebelum dapat kuasa…semua orang tak tahu buat kerja…tu yang Allah bagi peluang pegang kuasa tu…nak bagi kita tengok….cakap serupa bikin kah atau 2 x 5 juga…hehehe…ni baru beberap bulan…belum tahun lagi kan….
Salam Pak Sheikh…respon yang cukup konkrit dan realistik!! Suatu Harapan Baru seantero buana ke atas masa hadapan bumi Malaysia tercinta…InsyaAllah
Cumanya…saya kira sudah sampai tikanya, barangkali Pak Sheikh gunakan pendekatan “Pakatan Rakyat” lebih acapkali lagi daripada menonjolkan PKR sahaja…Mungkin klausa “The KeAdilan proposals” lebih molek digantikan dengan “The PR proposals”…hasratnya agar terlekat di minda dan sanubari rakyat marhaen perjuangan dan kebersamaan Pakatan Rakyat…Harus diingat PR ini sewajarnya dilestarikan lagi agar bisa terus gah dan diselami nuraninya…Benar Pak Sheikh punyai tuntas minda yang bijaksana bersama gugusan bijakpandai dalam PKR atas isu ini, tapi apakah sudah ditelaah minda rakan2 yang juga bijaksana dalam PAS dan DAP? Jika belum, inilah detiknya nadi itu perlu disederapkan…sekadar untuk ditimbang-timbangkan!!
Ayuh ke arah MALAYSIA BARU…InsyaAllah
Thank you.
Now to chew this after breakfast, err buka puasa.
–>Immidiate comment is the Federalism abuse of power in proposed Public Land Transportation Commission
–>Safety net: on a generalised comment, low-incomes are driven to buying less food items but hurting on grooming products such as shampoo, a sort of humiliation
–>The food sector is a serious area to get to grips with. Professional Project management could utilise additional man-power and reduce graduate unemployment.
—>Equally, rejuvenating and agitating the private sector will again prop up employment
—>Scope for human capital is clearly wanting in actual implementation or even planning but has been exceedingly accelerated in soap jingles.
—> Conspicuously absent is the economic risks in financial infrastructure regionally and globally against a backdrop of uncertain global political picture in the next decade, but this can wait, as it is just important to align domestic policies to global developments. Other non-economic factors to stimulate free flow of information, for transparency, is just as important to support corruption battles.
Now everyone can breakfast in peace, at the appointed time.
Salam Pak Sheikh…respon yang cukup konkrit dan realistik!! Suatu Harapan Baru seantero buana ke atas masa hadapan bumi Malaysia tercinta…InsyaAllah
Cumanya…saya kira sudah sampai tikanya, barangkali Pak Sheikh gunakan pendekatan “Pakatan Rakyat” lebih acapkali lagi daripada menonjolkan PKR sahaja…Mungkin klausa “The KeAdilan proposals” lebih molek digantikan dengan “The PR proposals”…hasratnya agar terlekat di minda dan sanubari rakyat marhaen perjuangan dan kebersamaan Pakatan Rakyat…Harus diingat PR ini sewajarnya dilestarikan lagi agar bisa terus gah dan diselami nuraninya…Benar Pak Sheikh punyai tuntas minda yang bijaksana bersama gugusan bijakpandai dalam PKR atas isu ini, tapi apakah sudah ditelaah minda rakan2 yang juga bijaksana dalam PAS dan DAP? Jika belum, inilah detiknya nadi itu perlu disederapkan…sekadar untuk ditimbang-timbangkan!!
Ayuh ke arah MALAYSIA BARU!!!
Biarpun keringat dan peluh menemani perjalanan yang jauh,
Namun azam dan tekad tetap terus bercahaya,
Biarpun sudah tegak menapak di Permatang Pauh,
Namun rentak tetap rancak menuju ke Putrajaya
DATUK SERI, APA DAH JADI PADA MATA PENCARIAN PEMUZIK-PEMUZIK PROFESIONAL TANAH AIR YANG MENCARI REZEKI DENGAN MEMBUAT PERSEMBAHAN SECARA KONTRAK DI HOTEL-HOTEL DAN KELAB-KELAB?? JBT AGAMA ISLAM SELANGOR (JAIS) SAPU PEKERJA SEBUAH HOTEL TERMASUK KUMPULAN MUZIK DAN MENYAMAN RM3000 SEORANG! YANG TIDAK MINUM ARAK PUN DI SAMAN!!! SEKARANG KEDAH PULAK MENGHARAMKAN PENYANYI PEREMPUAN. NAK MAKAN APA KAMI NI??? KALAU NASIB PEMUZIK-PEMUZIK TIDAK TERBELA, PASTI PILIHANRAYA AKAN DATANG, KAMI TOLAK PR. HARAP DATUK SERI DAPAT MESEJ INI.
SAYA BAGI PIHAK PEMUZIK PROFESIONAL TANAH AIR.
antipub Reply:
September 2nd, 2008 at 10:15 pm
patut la kerajaan kedah buat mcm tu.. rezeki di tangan tuhan. mana ada pemuzik yang hidup kaya raya sampai ke tua? di mana keberkatannya? pergi cari rezeki di tempat yang terkanal plg banyak syaitan.malu la sikit oii..
Melati Kota Reply:
September 3rd, 2008 at 1:57 am
PEMUZIK kena dibela. Setuju.
anak muda suka muzik, tolong perelokkan CARA, CHANAL nya je
kalau tak, mereka lagi songsang dan bertambah2 lintangpukang
beransur2 la didik minda agar semua berada dilandasan yang betul bukan setakat cakap n cakap je. yg pegang kuasa kena adil la.
SKATER Reply:
September 3rd, 2008 at 8:59 am
CARIK LAH REZEKI HALAL SIKIT…BANYAK LAGI CARANYA….TAK SEMESTINYA PERLU BEKERJA DI TEMPAT2 HARAM….JGN SAMPAI ANAK BERANAK KITA MAKAN DARI SUMBER YANG HARAM AKAN JADI YANG TAK BAIKLAH APABILA SUMBER DARI YANG TAK BAIK…DI HARAP ANDA DAPAT MENCARIK REZEKI YANG LEBIH HALAL DARI MENYANYI KAT DALAM KELAB2 MALAM N PUB…SEKIAN
Penyanyi tak Pro Reply:
September 3rd, 2008 at 2:53 pm
Tu la sapa suruh tak belajar masa kecik dulu. tau melalak jer. tak pasal-pasal kena kerja melalak.
Hang ingat BN tu pun baik sangat ke???
Sashi Reply:
September 4th, 2008 at 4:51 am
Hey badut, kau dengar sini baik2, kalau ku nak nyanyi buat ablum sendiri, tak erlu nak nyanyi kat hotel2 akau kelab malam. Ada faham? Kan negara kita ni ada undang2 syariah? Biala dah ada undang2 kau orang ikut je lah, apa susah sangat? Bila orang kata jangan buat, jangan buat lah. Faham tak?
Muhd Ali Abd Rahman Reply:
September 5th, 2008 at 1:52 pm
Suruh ja tukar profesion senang…..jadi muazin kah, buat album berunsur keagamaan kah……yang berbentuk nasihat pedoman…mendidik….tak ada masalah…lumayan gak pendapatan tu…..yang melalak, buka baju, tunjuk buntut, goyang inul, kopi dangdut tu…..atau yang sama waktu dgn nya…tak payah……ikut ja undang-undang dan huku..selamaaat….
AdamAdli Reply:
September 9th, 2008 at 3:35 pm
assalamualaikum.. beginilah, kita balik kepada islam..x perlu pergi dalam, cukup dgn basic yg kita tau dari kecik, sesuai dengan pengetahuan agama kita.. prtama. suara wanita itu aurat.. aurat itu, hukumnya haram didedahkan… kedua.. dah nama pun kelab malam..sumber utama pendapatan dah tentu2 arak…so, halalkah lagi duit upah menyanyi untuk hiburkan peminum arak?? duit upah tu pun dtg dari arak..kan??
mari kita bincangkan pandangan dibawah untuk ekonomi rakyat MALAYSIA.
Asas kehidupan ; MAKANAN, TEMPAT TINGGAL,PENGANGKUTAN.Tiga perkara ini menghantui kehidupan rakyat MALAYSIA.Jika ini dapat diatasi rakyat MALAYSIA akan sentiasa berada dalam rukun ,damai dan sentosa.Bincangkan jika anda rasa pendapat ini betul.WASSALLAM.
Bicara 1
Saya ingin menyentuh tentang tender terbuka yang akan dilaksanakan oleh kerajaan P.Pinang dan Perak.Saya setuju dengan cadangan tersebut dan harap dilaksanakan dengan segera. Saya tidak nampak kekurangan tentang tender tersebut boleh menyebabkan orang melayu gagal dalam perniagaannya kecuali mereka yang jenis Alibaba.Saya telah mempraktikan lebih awal secara sendirian tentang tender terbuka tersebut selaras dengan pekeliling Kementerian Kewangan,setiap sebutharga 50K-200K dibuka kepada syarikat bumiputra yang berdaftar dengan Kementerian Kewangan, tiada sebutharga rundingan terus diadakan sepanjang saya melaksanakannya.Bagaimana saya melaksanakannya adalah spt berikut:
Pembekalan:
1.Mendapat sebutharga dari sykt bukan bumiputra untuk pembandingan harga(2-3 syarikat)2.Meminta sykt tersebut hantar sebutharga dengan sijil bumiputra (untuk kenalpasti syarikat ALIBABA)
3.Membuat sebutharga terbuka dengan memanggil semua pembekal bumiputra yang berdaftar-diiklankan dipapan kenyataan dan akhbar.(harga telah saya tetapkan tidak lebih 20% daripada harga pasaran @ ALIBABA untuk tujuan pemilihan/pembelian)
4.Membuat keputusan pada harga terbaik dengan jujur dan amanah.
Kesimpulan :
1.Peniaga bukan Bumiputra tetap dapat faedah perniagaan
2.Kerajaan hanya bertujuan memberi peluang perniagaan kepada Bumiputra dan saya berharap Bumiputra tersebut dapat mengembangkan perniagaan dengan menjadi pengimport dan pengedar pula dimasa akan datang.Jadi Bumiputra tersebut boleh berniaga di segmen 200K keatas.
3.Saya dapat membeli barang dengan harga yang munasabah dan dapat menjimatkan duit rakyat dengan perbelanjaan berhemah.
4.Harga runding terus yang melampau dapat disekat,jika didapati harga tidak munasabah saya meminta pegawai yang memohon ;bertanggungjawab dan mereka boleh disiasat BPR atau Audit.
Kelemahan:
1. Terdapat juga Bumiputra yang tak malu ,sanggup makan komisyen 5%,jadi mereka disenaraihitamkan daripada sebutharga.(lakukan siasatan sendiri).
Kerja-kerja Kontrak:
1.Keutamaan diberikan kepada kontraktor bumiputra yang mempunyai pekerja dan jentera.
2.Jika di-subkontrakkan saya pastikan dapat sebutharga dengan kontraktor bukan bumiputra terlebih dahulu dan menambah 20% lagi untuk kontraktor bumiputra.(Hampir 80% kontraktor bumiputra akan bekerjasama dengan kontraktor cina(bina bangunan) & kontraktor india(turap jalan).
3.Pada hemat saya tiada siapa yang akan rasa rugi bila sebutharga/tender terbuka ini dijalankan dimana Bumiputra sebagai pelaksana kerja dan bukan Bumiputra sebagai pembekal keperluan.
4.Jika disyaki pemberian terus dilakukan ;saya melakukan siasatan dalaman dimana saya akan memeriksa setiap syarikat yang menghantar sebutharga tersebut dan tindakan tatatertib boleh dikenakan kepada yang terlibat.
Tender 200K keatas:(Cadangan)
1.Keutamaan kepada syarikat Bumiputra yang bergandingan dengan syarikat Bukan Bumiputra
2.Keupayaan menyiapkan kerja,latarbelakang dan pengalaman projek,kewangan yang kukuh dan; denda yang berat /gantirugi kepada kerajaan jika tak siap kerja dan bukan kerajaan yang bayar gantirugi kepada syarikat.Hukum penjara jika gagal melaksanakan projek untuk rakyat .
Oleh itu saya menyokong tender/sebutharga terbuka dilakukan dengan segera dimana 50K-200k dikekalkan pada taraf Bumiputra dan lebih daripada 200K dibuka untuk semua.
Bicara 2
Saya ingin berbicara hanya tentang persekitaran saya sahaja. Tekanan ekonomi harian terutama sumber makanan pada saya boleh diatasi jika setiap orang daripada menteri hingga pegawai pelaksana dapat menghayati tujuan kerajaan @ kementerian itu di bentuk.Sektor pertanian bukan komoditi seharusnya dibaikpulih secara besar-besaran kerana sepanjang saya terlibat secara profesional ini pelbagai kepincangan dapat saya saksikan. Senarai adalah spt berikut;
1)PM KENA TIPU - Lancarkan projek pertanian Mega; ttp berharap menteri menjadi penyokong kempen,beliau hanya tunggu di mesyuarat kabinet untuk laporan,PM nak melawat projek kelamkabut menteri cari projek tipu(one night ready) untuk puaskan hati PM,jawapnya PM kena TIPU.Tempoh nak melawat dengan masa lawatan terlalu panjang so sempatlah kaki tipu bikin kerja;sepatutnya PM buat sudden check terutama bila buat program jumpa rakyat,jangan bagitau nak tengok projek pertanian ttp PM nak celebration party so dua-duapun tipu.Pada saya PM,Menteri,YB patut kurangkan celebration arrival sbb orng kampung tetap sokong jika kerja bagus dan makan minum tetap disediakan sebagai menghormati tetamu.
2)Menteri Penipu - Cara kerja pun sama spt PM ;tambahan tipu projek sbb semua projek kasi kat friendster tanpa ada tender jadi komisyen pun dia sapu(ini bukan cerita tipu).Lepas tu kroni buat alakadar ; paksa kerajaan bayar ttp kerja tak siap dan tak senereh(hancus),bayar..bayar dan bayar projek sama dengan alasan kos meningkat ttp sebenarnya dari day one dah fikir cara mana nak songlap duit.Lepas tu boleh tak malu kata projek tak relevan dan kerajaan pulak bayar gantirugi.Macamni cina botol pun nak jadi kontraktor.Menteri ni mesti diattachkan satu pemeriksa projek dengan YB pembangkang(jangan takut sbb jika kerja bagus BN tetap dipilih cth mcm PAC).Dua-dua report kat PM.Baru betul jadi PM untuk semua.
3)Pegawai Kementerian/Jabatan Tipu-Satu penyakit yang saya nampak ialah semua pegawai sibuk berpolitik untuk naik pangkat G41,G48,G52 dll sampai kerja sendiri tak buat lagi dan sibuk kipas Ketua Jabatan dan Menteri,poyo je muka masing2 takde rasa salahpun.Menteri patut buat task untuk mereka untuk achive hasil pengeluaran negara bukan penuhkan hasil poket friendster;turun buat spot check projek sebelum nak meeting mingguan bukan tunggu pegawai kasi report virtual(mat jenin style), lepas tu jika projek sukses baru kasi pangkat dan gagal bekukan kenaikan pangkat(takkan pemimpin Malaysia tak masuk U,20% teori ,80%praktikal,ttp kalau YB Malaysia kaki xerox,otak memang kosong).
4)Pegawai Pelaksana Kaki Tipu- My little Napoleon.(Perosak Dasar)Kuasa ciput tapi power besar .Orang kampung(PPN)cukup menyampah dengan diorang.Mintak ni, Bincang tu,Cerita ni ;semua ikut diorang je bila nak intertain,Peuntukan kerajaan ikut suka hati nak bagi saper je.Orang buat projek dia tak bagi peruntukan ttp tak buat projek dia bagi pula.(projek fiendster paling kecil dalam hiraki kronisma)Alasan kojo banyak meeting..meeting..meeting jadi dicadangkan diorang dipanggil meeting sebulan sekali je .Bawa semua fail projek dan bentangkan selepas pegawai jabatan check sendiri projek.Lain-lain perkara sama spt Pegawai TIPU.
5)JKKKampung Cuba Nak TIPU - Kesian orang kampung yang pilih AJK JKKK,harap dapat bantu ttp dia boleh buat line kecil , tak kawan tak tolong ;tak sama parti tak bantu sedangkan kalau bantu BN dapat nama.YB datang kasi gula-gula jalan kampung dan cat masjid lepastu hebahkan dia member YB.Sepatutnya dia muafakatkan satu kampung dan paksa kerajaan buat projek ekonomi kat tempat dia.
6)Rakyat TERTIPU - sbb pilih BN selama 50 tahun ,duit habih hidup rakyat sebagai PETANI,PENTERNAK & NELAYAN tak pernah kaya dan senang.Dalam dunia business , tak pernah manufacturer lebih miskin daripada distributor.
Bicara 3
Jamin makanan cukup - Peruntukan RM4b sedia stok penimbal, buka kawasan baru – PM -Utusan Malaysia 20/04/08
Gitulah janji PM kita yang disayangi,dimanakah kebenaranannya.Duit 4 billion tu banyak ttp semenjak dari mulanya lagi industri Pertanian di war-warkan , telah berbilion duit digunakan setiap tahun kononnya memperkasakan petani ,penternak dan nelayan(PPN) tetapi habis disonglap ditengah jalan oleh perompak-perompak banjingan.
Kerajaan sepatutnya berhenti mengeluarkan duit lagi untuk projek2 palsu dimana kebanyakan laba hanya menguntungkan perompak2 banjingan.
Dalam perbincangan kedai kopi di tempat sejuk di C.Highland, otak segar berputar mencari idea untuk menyelamatkan petani,penternak dan nelayan kita.Tindakan orang tengah yang terus menekan,menghimpit kehidupan PPN tidak dapat dibendung lagi.Setiap peringkat menyalahkan kenaikan harga minyak untuk terus menekan pasaran.Adakah jalan keluar tiada lagi?
Kerajaan harusnya menjadi kunci kepda semua penyelesaian tersebut dimana jalan keluar yang boleh difikirkan adalah mempunyai dua sistem dalam satu pemerintahan.Sistem yang disyorkan ialah sistem terbuka dan sistem sosial
Kerajaan dengan perutukan berbilion ringgit sepatutnya mempunyai sistem sosial dimana setiap keperluan asas diurus tadbir oleh kerajaan bersaing dengan sistem terbuka.Persaingan akan menyebabkan harga dapat diturunkan.Monopoli dapat dipecahkan kerana sifat pasaran itu sendiri.
Sistem koperasi patut diteguhkan dimana semua rakyat yang berminat boleh melabur didalam koperasi teras makanan dan setiap orang/ahli menentukan harga barangan tersebut.Dengan pengurusan tunai yang baik tidak ada pengeluar yang tidak ingin bekerjasama dengan koperasi tersebut.Satu koperasi satu perkhidmatan.
Berikut adalah contoh pelan cadangan (bagi mereka yang bengap ttg konsep ini)
Pasaran terbuka :
Bahan mentah (A)- Pengilang(B) - Pengangkutan (C)- Pemborong (D)-Pengangkutan (E) -Peruncit (F) - Pengguna (G)
Kos : $100 (A) - $200 (B) - $230 (C) -$345 (D) - $396 (E) - $528(F) = Pengguna (G)
Setiap peningkatan dalam sistem terbuka adalah disebabkan terdapat sistem kredit sepanjang pusingan perniagaan.
Pasaran Sosial :
Bahan mentah(KERAJAAN IMPORT SENDIRI) (A) - Pengilang (B)(KERAJAAN MINTA PACKING) - Pengangkutan (C) - Koperasi (D) - Pengguna (E)
Kos : $80-100(A) - $120-150(B) - $141 - $160(C) - $165-$180 (D) = Pengguna (E)
Setiap pusingan adalan tunai dari peserta koperasi dan subsidi kerajaan jadi setiap rakyat jelata dapat membeli barangan asas dengan harga murah.Setiap peringkat keuntungan diambilkira hanya 15% sebagai bayaran pengurusan.
Sistem perniagaan akan menjadi lebih efisien kerana tunai sentiasa beredar dan tiada mana-mana ahli perniagaan yang tidak ingin berniaga dengan orang yang mempunyai tunai.
Bagi PPN, semua keperluan asas pertanian tadi dapat dibeli dikoperasi dengan harga murah, maka kos pengeluaran adalah rendah,Koperasi membeli balik dengan harga yang lebih tinggi dari PPN dan menjual semula dengan harga yang lebih rendah dari pasaran terbuka.Win-win situation akan berlaku dan semua orang akan bergembira dan PM pun boleh tidur lagi.Contoh terdekat di Asia ialah sila rujuk sistem pertanian di Korea.
Peringatan :Projek ini tidak akan berjaya jika diketuai oleh bapak penyamun dan Perompak Banjingan , FAMA,PPK dan BERNAS (semua ni group hampeh)dan sewaktu dengannya.
Nasihat kepada Tok Setopa Menteri Pertanian baru,jika pergi melihat projek luar negeri tu ,pergilah belajar bukannya melancong dan bila balik ;buat hebahan nak buat tu,buat ni macam rakan lama dia tu.Kambinglah . lembulah ,mangga lah dll tetapi bila buat projek bagi kat kroni, lepas tu tak siap , mintak tambah duit lagi nak kasi selamat kunun…Hampeh.Lembu 2-3 ekor,rumput 10-20 helai , kata projek mega.PM datang tengok, tunjuk sejemput jembut.Apa nak jadi pun tak tahu …..
Bicara 4
GLC edar barang makanan utama- berita harian 11/05/08
Saya gembira dengan pengumuman ini selaras dengan idea yang pernah saya syorkan didalam blog ini dan berharap ianya berlaku secepat mungkin. Saya berharap penyelaras hanyalah pada 2 peringkat sahaja , pembungkus dan peruncit dan setiap level keuntungan tidak lebih 15 % atau lagi kurang lagi bagus.
KERAJAAN HANYA KELUAR BELANJA PERTAMA UNTUK BELI BARANGAN , selepas itu rakyat akan memberi modal dengan menyimpan dalam koperasi/GLC tersebut. Pendaftaran isi keluarga boleh diadakan untuk kenalpasti subsidi perlu diberikan kepada setiap keluarga.Keuntungan KOPERASI/GLC TAHUNAN JUGA BOLEH DIKONGSI BERSAMA AHLI.Barang dapat , duit pun dapat.Sila rujuk konsep kad loyalty.Saya pasti ia akan berjaya dan kerajaan mampu sbb kerajaan banyak duit.Kaedah ini tergunapakai untuk keperluan asas shj.bukan untuk barangan mewah.
Peringatan : Audit luar mesti dijadikan sebagai pemeriksa akaun kerana telah terbukti setiap orang akan mengambil kesempatan dengan loop yang ada jika membabitkan kewangan yang banyak . Cth ; MENGAMBIL KOMISYEN DARI PEMBUNGKUS dan menambah harga dalam resit.Pengurus berAKHLAK, AMANAH dan JUJUR diutamakan dan tolong jangan pilih poli-TIKUS(hampeh)
Berkenaan minyak ,
Saya cadangkan setiap kereta disubsidi setiap bulan pada hari Isnin - Jumaat (15 km/hari),Sabtu /Ahad (100 km) dan hujung bulan (500 km), Selain waktu itu beli minyak harga kaunter.Tiada subsidi untuk kereta 2.2L keatas ttp cukai jalan dikurangkan untuk 2.2L(takde langsung lagi bagus)- adil untuk pembeli kereta besar. Perkiraan ini adalah anggaran penggunaan asas setiap isirumah di Malaysia.
Duit subsidi 45 billion itu beli bas banyak-banyak dan operasi selang 10 minit untuk kemudahan awam , charge flat RM2.50(hari),Subsidi penuh untuk bas,taxi,lori & nelayan , pertanian shj. Golongan Peniagaan , cukai ditolak dari cukai koporat termasuk dengan perbelanjaan minyak tahunan syarikat.Kad rebet subsidi boleh diberi semasa renewal road tax di JPJ.
Semoga prihatin kerajaan dapat dilaksanakan secepat mungkin.
Bicara 5
Pengumuman Kerajaan menaikkan harga minyak telah dikecam dan diberikan pelbagai pandangan oleh orang ramai dan juga diambil kesempatan oleh parti politik untuk menghentam kerajaan.PM telah ditekan tanpa diberikan buah fikiran sebenar untuk mengatasi perkara tersebut.
Pandangan Kritik Kedai Kopi (3K) sebelum ini sealiran dengan PM,dimana subsidi yang diumumkan adalah berpadanan dengan keperluan sebenar rakyat Malaysia.3K ingin mengulas beberapa perkara lagi agar dapat diperbaiki lagi.
Pengumuman PM :
PM seharusnya membuat pengumuman menyeluruh kerana pengumuman kenaikan harga minyak telah menyebabkan panik dikalangan rakyat dan diambil kesempatan oleh ahli politik, untuk bertindak sebagai pencetus ketidakstabilan negara.3K tidak menganggap PM tidak popular atau sebaliknya ttp PM harus ambil kesempatan dengan mengumumkan sekaligus jalan penyelesaian untuk mengurangkan beban rakyat.
Apakah masaalah sebenar rakyat?
Harga barangan meningkat.Seperti 3K saran sebelum ini, kerajaan harus bertindak sebagai pengedar barangan keperluan asas rakyat.Koperasi rakyat mesti ditubuhkan dan kerajaan menjadi perunding pembekalan (procument).Pembelian pertama dimodalkan oleh kerajaan dan rakyat kemudian berdaftar untuk membeli saham koperasi(andaian RM350 setiap isi rumah).Setiap pembelian kerajaan ,keuntungan 5-10% dibenarkan untuk kos pengurusan dan baki keuntungan boleh dikembalikan hujung tahun kepada rakyat.Rakyat tentu akan gembira dimana dapat barang dan duit sekali.
Rakyat sendiri memodalkan barangan keperluan asas mereka dan kerajaan mengedarkannya dipusat koperasi atau lebih cepat lagi dipasaraya besar (tesco,giant,carefour).Pasaraya besar lazimnya akan ambil untung 15%(minta mereka bayar tunai setelah setiap barangan habis dijual).Sediakan satu bahagian untuk jualan asas rakyat .Bahagian pentadbiran ini mestilah diurus bersama oleh KPDHEP dan Audit Negara.Tiada ahli politik dibenarkan mengisi jawatan dan setiap perbelanjaan diistiharkan oleh kerajaan 3 bulan sekali.
Senarai barangan asas adalah spt berikut :(5 orang isirumah/bulan)
Ayam Bersih(Berkepala, kaki, hati & hempedal 4 ekor
Daging Lembu(Tempatan) 2 kilo
Ikan Kembung Hitam/ Hijau(Tempatan) 16 kilo
Ikan Tongkol / Aya / Kayu(Tempatan) 4 kilo
Udang Kertas Putih(Kecil) 4 kilo
Ikan Selar Kuning (Tempatan) 16 kilo
Cili Merah/kering 2 kilo
Sawi/Kacang Panjang