BUKIT MERTAJAM: Taking an oath on the Quran does not absolve a person of his sin and a Muslim should not make a mockery of the holy book by swearing on it.
Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim said he decided to take the alleged sodomy case to Syariah Court because his honour and dignity were at stake.
“Please do not make a mockery of the holy book. Can you absolve your sin by swearing on the Quran?
“If you respect the law and the dignity of a man, do not use the Quran for political mileage,” he said Sunday during a press conference at Yayasan Aman here.
He said there were many contradictory statements in relation to the case and it showed his perpetrators and the police were bent on tarnishing his image with the allegation.
Anwar said he took the matter to Syariah Court following advice by Muslim scholars and described the allegation as a malicious attack on his character in view of the Permatang Pauh by-election.
He said his adversaries had been attacking him for being anti-Malay and an American stooge and that he was also sacrificing religion for personal gains.
Assalamualikum WBH….
DSAI & Semua Blogger,
Mempersendakan Al-Quran? Sanggup mereka mempersendakan Al-Quran, sementelah menghancurkan manusia dengan BOM. Memfitnah? apa lagi…perkara biasa la.Menipu..eleh kacangan.Tuk apa berbicara fasal maksum..rata-rata org AMNO/BE END kata DSAI maksum. Sudah tentu mereka tak maksum, termasuk ular dalam semak mereka.Sanggup berkomplot dengan menghina dan mempermain-mainkan salah satu Mukjizat Nabi Muhammad SAW iaitu Al Quran.Segeralah WAHAI RAKYAT MALAYSIA SEDAR.. jangan sampai BALA dari Si SAI-FOOL tu melanda seluruh MALAYSIA. Silap-silap Allah Taala boleh turunkan bala seperti Tsunami ke,Gempa Bumi ke. Allah tidak akan menurunkan Bala kepada dia seorang,kemungkinan?????? Jangan main-main…
APA PUN KITA PERLU:
TTTTTTTTTTTUUUUUUUUUUUUUUKKKKKKKKKAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRR
Reply
In response to comment no 74 by Muhd Ali Abd Rahman in ‘Sumpah Saiful Penuh Keraguan…’
As DSAI’s supporter I am always intrigued about other people’s reasons for hating DSAI. You are of course entitled to your opinion as I am. The reason being is that I always think it is healthy that I listen to the other side as much as I listen to DSAI’s side of the story. So that I know I am not supporting DSAI because I am over awed by him as suggested by Muhd Ali Abd Rahman. It is a shame that your comments (Muhd Ali Abd Rahman) left very little for me to actually use as facts. Where are your proofs sir that we all should really hate DSAI’s guts for what he did to us in the past?
From what I deduced from listening to the news, all media and not just what is written by the NST and Utusan of course, after the incident of DSAI’s arrest back in 1998, throughout the court case and his jail term, DSAI had become too much of a threat to the government at the time and everyone who read the news can see that, except you. Do I have proof? yes because he has been saying it all throughout his court case and even when he was in jail yet no one in the government even attempted to investigate if there was any right to what he has been saying about the corruption that was going on so there you go. He was a TPM and yet none of the government officials think it is worth investigating and give no reason for not doing so.
You see dear Muhd Ali Abd Rahman, in a democratic country, you should listen to the people’s voice and DSAI’s voiced as a TPM should be heard as well. If the government and our judiciary system is squeaky clean then that is what we would find out from an investigation and everyone would be happy to call DSAI a liar but tell me this, why are there no investigation done? What is the government afraid of? Simple, they are afraid that the people will see the truth from the investigations that the government and the judiciary system are corrupt.
And by the way, if you truly believe that our judiary system is clean then you would have accepted that DSAI is innocent of the first Sodomy case. May be you have doubt in our judiciary system after all…
I would like you to explain why saiful said one minute that he was unaware of the by election just after he swore on the Quran and yet he said only a few days before he swore in the masjid good luck to DSAI at the by election. Is that not a blatant lie coming from him?
Also explain why the police did not provide DSAI with the police report soon after saiful made his report. If you are charged with something, wouldn’t you like to know what you are charged with? Wouldn’t you yourself cry foul if no police report is given to you and no reason is given why they are not providing you with details of the crime so that you can defend yourself. Unless you think that once you are charged then you are guilty… and if that is the case, your idea of democracy is seriously flawed.
And why oh why is there no investigation over the medical report that was leaked? How was it leaked? Is it a genuine medical report? Why cannot the police comment on this? Are you telling me swearing on the Quran is far more believable that a medical report? And why has the doctor gone missing? All these questions left unanswered by the police, let me hear your theory sir, please I am very interested to know what you think of all this. Remember that the sodomy case was not publicised by DSAI it was saiful who made the accusation and started the media frenzy by making it public. If publicity is not on his agenda then why didn’t he leave the media out of it? Why swear on the Quran if he is telling the truth? How many religious experts did he consult before doing this? Who are they? How many did DSAI consulted who told him that swearing on the Quran is not the Islamic way? Did you know that DSAI consulted many before making the desision not to do this? Did NST and Utusan wrote that DSAI was advised by a long list of very reputable ulamaks not to swear on the Quran? Are you professing that one Mufti Perlis and yourself is the best adviser than all these experts in Islam and its laws?
Please sir, I would like to tell you as politely as I can, bring on something with more substance in your comments or not say anything at all.
I have a challenge for all those who oppose DSAI to prove me wrong. Give me something that I can actually sink my teeth in and not some flim flam stuff. You do not need to go through proper education because even common sense is enough for you to know that you do not refute a statement with another without proof. Bring in better comments than personal attacks on DSAI. Trust me, you would be better received by other bloggers. If all you have got is similar to, ‘Well, if saiful says DSAI did it then he must have done it.’ I have heard it and it has not convinced me at all.
Reply
Asalamualaikum
the chinese are 100% solidly supporting DSAI to be the next PM of Malaysia.
to my malay and indian friends
come let us together show and prove our solidarity and rally
behind DSAI.
forget about saiful sinful or whatever fool .
just go all out and vote DSAI your MP and our next PM of all Malaysian.
long live DSAI and may god bless you and your family.
Ameen
Reply
slm…
well said Malaysian Living Abroad (number 2)…it’s just sad to see there are still people who believe this whole hindi movie episode to be true, and nothing but the truth…
i mean, come on people, IT IS A PLOY to discredit DSAI before us malaysians…the script keeps on changing, the plot is getting really confusing, the main actor is flip-flopping (not even good at lying too!)…all in all, a botched up drama directed by the government (or certain quarters within the government…well, who cares anyway, they r still a part of the government for all i care!)
get real people!
Reply
I agree with your above statements. I for once was non partisan to any political party and supported no one. I regard those in Government as elected representative of the people. After 50 years of independence those in the government has not done anything to improve the quality of life for all Malaysian. UMNO, MCA and MIC didn’t do much to their supporters but become rich for them self. When DSAI was accused of corruption and sodomy by the PM in 1998, I was not convinced.
Even when he was ‘convicted’ after lengthy trial’ I was still not convinced, and in early 2004 I told some of my friends that DSAI ‘conviction’ will be dropped before end of 2004 which came true. From that time I began to support him as a politician who can bring change to Malaysia. As for his accuser who was the PM at that time I believed all was done because DSAI want to challenge him to the post.
As you said they have no proof to bring DSAI down and so they resort to all dirty trick they can think off.
Reply
To Malaysian living abroad & DSAI,
DSAI an American stooge? Actually the accusation is more of a Yehudi stooge? I have studied various books and cause to concern on The International Yehudi. One of the ways they have been successful to conquer the world financially is getting Muslims off the “CONTENTS” of the Quran. Make the Muslims be left behind…
As a result of getting Muslims off the “CONTENTS” of the Quran, you have swearing with the Quran. This makes Quran at same level with the Bible in courts. Just like swearing on the Quran or the Bible, “You’ll tell the truth, the whole truth, nothing but the truth”, in Amarican courts and elsewhere around the world. And yet, you still have the witnesses, the accusers and the accused, to lie all the way in court after swearing…
Human have the tendency to lie. If not a direct lie, a partial lie. Some would claims it is half truth, or restricting the whole truth. Even if DSAI were to be the PM, you may make some decisions where you won’t tell the whole truth to the people of Malaysia. (in case he is a person who doesn’t lie…). It’s politics!
I had my doubts on DSAI like most others. One of my doubts is what happens after DSAI? For example, Dr Mahathir may have changed the Malaysian justice system so it may well work for him as a dictator-leader. His visions got blurred with all those powers. Once you have a weaker PM after Dr Mahathir, then what?
Similarly, the Pakatan Rakyat have extremely loose ends. If DSAI becomes PM, everything may work fine. For our generation of mid 30s and younger, who will tie these new formation to govern the country once DSAI retires from politics? Some uncomforting issues need to be addressed to gain Malaysian’s full support.
Is it Bangsa Malaysia (BM) or Ketuanan Melayu (KM)?
If BM, YB Karpal says the PM will be appointed from the largest party who won Parliament seats within its Pakatan. Hmmm, more unsettling issues man!
If KM, Malaysia will continue to be A RACIST COUNTRY. Come to think of it, I m a Malay Muslim, yet this only got to me during SUKOM 1998, when I was already 20 years old. Caucasian Australians beats up Asians Australia in Australia. I once argued Australians are racist… This was when it struck me, YEAH! Malaysia is more RACIST… It sounded as bad as Yehudis calling Nazis, FARCIST!
Sure there’s a solution… consulting world ulama’ was a great move. But, Karpal won’t hear ulama’. Hmmm…
Sure there’s a solution… let’s just hope it is not a patch and make up solution like Dr Mahathir’s flawed ways…
Sure there’s a solution… keep consulting ulama’s on how Muslims will return to Quran and how non Muslim Malaysians could understand the “CONTENTS” of the Quran to appreciate what Islam is all about while still maintaining their current religious stand…
PK tuan-tuan…
Reply
Hi DSAI,
Assalamu Alaikum
I fully agreed with you, without qualification, to exert that “taking an oath on the Qur’an does not absolve a person of his sin and a Muslim should not make a mockery of the holy book by swearing on it”. Perhaps, I would like to add that in the instant case, swearing on the Holy Qur’an would compound the sin! In this regard, I seek to re-posit my previous comment from “Anwar questions accuser’s timing” to the more relevant place here. It is adapted from the backbone of an Islamic writing done in corroboration with late lawyer Abdul Razak, your PKR strongman in JB.
August 15th, 2008 is the saddest Islamic day in our Malaysian history when the irreligious hijack the Holy Qur’an and use it as tool of expediency. In this regard, I am using “The Qur’an”, an English translation approved by the Supreme Sunni and Shii Councils of the Republic of Lebanon to conduct Islamic theological exposition concerning why this incident is profanities most foul. Please refer to your choice Qur’an while following my theological reasoning.
Qur’an in 6:19 raises this crucial question. “What thing counts most in testimony (6:19)?” The answer it provides for all Muslims is “Say, ‘Let Allah be a witness between me and you’ (6:19)”. Since no one has seen Allah, therefore believers of God should take His holy name seriously. This is follow by the exhortation: “Do not swear, true obedience (will count). Allah is cognizant of all your actions (24:53)”. In plain language, this 24:53 recommends that believers of God should simply be honest and straightforward in their speech. All you need to say is “Yes” if you mean yes, “No” if you mean no; anything more than this comes from the Evil One.
“Glory” in 6:91 has two opposing connotations. They are, namely, “the glory shown by God” and “the glory given by believers”. They are posited exactly at the opposing ends of the same continuum. That is what 39:23 meant! “A Book uniform and yet repeating pairs of promises and threats and the like (39:23).” In this instance, one refers to God while the other points towards mankind. Incidentally, if you shift their applications around albeit through sheer ignorant, “glory” this keyword becomes a profane word. Caution then, saudara and saudari!
The Qur’an allows the limited use of profanities, which include profane language, or conduct, a blasphemy or oath. All of these come within the purview of 4:148. It deals with man in situations of high frustration when nothing seems to yield and prevail. When a man realizes his powerlessness or finitude, he may seek the use of profanities. In such use of profanities are his cosmic protests when he sees the “existential” claim of his life, when he knows what “being in such an awful situation” is. Those profanities represent his label for this dire predicament where in some way his existence is shown in its “bona fide” attribute. Profanities express “heroic disinclination”. It is an assertion of a person’s being pour vitriol and so on. It appeals to a characteristic situation of discernment and depth of his impasse, but at the cost of replacing “God” this word by the words used in profanities. Here, I am talking about “God” this word as opposes to “God” this Divine Being. That is the sole entry point in using 39:23 for a very forceful counter reasoning in this sworn on the Holy Qur’an to settle the issues concerning sodomy II!
If Adam or we choose “all the names (2:31)”, and by definition it is literally any name, it would imply that it is within our power and authority to will and create any religious situation anew. These amounts to we have the capacity to provide God with our guarantees. At the same time, we have the capacity to compel any religious disclosure from God. However, there are two exceptions to this generalization. They are, namely, circumcision for Muslims and Jews, baptism for Christians and when an explorer “labeled” his newly discovered land “In the name of God”.
Incidentally, we are now coming face-to-face, glaring at the logical ground where the Qur’an bans profanities. For profanities express our human heroic defiance. The Qur’an described this “human heroic defiance” as “man transgress (96:6) in thinking that himself is self-sufficient (96:7)”!
Pursuing this particular point still further, several very important salient features would emerge. In religious parlance, this precise situation is called “a Divine disclosure is contained within another Divine disclosure”. They are,
(1) It signifies a characteristic situation of Adam discerning this Divine disclosure when God “taught Adam all the names (2:31)”. Only when God Himself to circumstance discloses a “name” to us becomes characteristically religious. Adam “named them” (2:33) after God had taught him all the names (2:31) connote the salient fact that his discernment of this Divine disclosure (2:31) is a depth evoking one. Otherwise, Adam would fail in his effort to name them (2:33).
(2) When a man profane, two theological issues would arise. Firstly, God is Holy. Profanities is therefore not emanating from God. By implication, all profanities belong to the Evil One. Secondly, when a man profane, God is replaced by profane word used, which is emanating from the Evil One. This has no logical connection with the Divine scheme of God “taught Adam all the names (2:31)”; and God “taught by the pen, taught man what he did not know (96:3-5)”.
(3) Here and now, in a situation of depth evoking discernment, an “oath” takes the place of God.
Let us focus on re (1) to (3) now. God “taught man what he did not know” in 96:5 must be taken as continual and never ending on-going process of God is guiding the thoughts of specific individuals, inspiring, encouraging and teaching mankind. This is expressed in general terms of God is “regulating all things (10:3)”. It signifies the continuing presence of God in His role as Creator provides providential guidance to human beings.
This entirely Qur’an based theological reasoning concerns God breathed His Spirit into man mentioned in 15:29 and 32:9. God has also written the faith in man’s heart and strengthened them with a Spirit of His own (58:22). God lifted up, expanded man’s heart (94:1) thereby putting love and kindness in his heart (30:21), and beautified it (49:7). While God taught man what he does not know (96:5) and reveals it by His grace to individual heart (2:97). In 2:93, it reminds men to take what God has given us with willing hearts. The key expressions within this entirely Qur’an based theological parameter are “God’s Spirit” and “man’s heart”. Theologically, the heart in human person is the medium where the encounter with God takes place (30:21 & 49:7). Our “humility and awe without ostentation (7:205)” is the arena through which God communicates with us (10:100).
Thus, under His Law, believers are to be holy unto Allah. As such, 6:75-79 demonstrates the fact that personal faith in God is a gradual progression from ignorant to enlightenment as God “taught man what he did not know (96:5)”. In an analogy, the relationship is akin to student and teacher. As teacher taught, the kindergarten children have to take for granted whatsoever new knowledge disseminated by their teacher and learn obediently. Taking a helicopter ride from the plain to the mountain height of faith, or a straight jump from kindergarten to University is totally out of the question. For the Qur’an says, “No soul can have faith except by the will of Allah (10:100). Allah has endeared the Faith to you and beautified it in your hearts (49:7)”.
Meanwhile, do you know, really know the tacit meanings conveyed to us by 96:3-5? That is “Read! Your Lord is the Most Bountiful One, who taught by the pen, taught man what he did not know (96:3-5)”.
It relates to God taught men that there are claims on us beyond self-interest, which have to do concurrently with integrity, justice and mercy. At the undefined margins between integrity, justice and mercy these three major teachings uphold by the Qur’an is a panorama of spiritual landscapes. In God “taught by the pen, taught man what he did not know (96:3-5)” until man can “named them (2:33)”, have you ever spare a moment and ask yourself, “What must the pen do?” Its self-given obvious answer is the pen must be used to take notes and write what God has taught men what he did not now. Are you certain, then, the “pen” mentioned in 96:3-5 must exclude the medical report from the examining Muslim doctor?
It means God has withdraw His continual care and reforming regeneration in creating anew for us if you choose to exclude “pen” from formally trained the examining doctor who has clearly named the “gold mine” in question was normal, no bleeding, there were no sign of piles and no abscess and no pus, no injury, no tear and no discharge. The gold mine was clean and dry and looked normal. No abnormalities seen.
On these bases, rather than indulging triumphantly in profanities most foul directed against Allah and His Word written, it is far better for Saiful either to fly kites or tying shoestrings in loony bin!
Reply
As an ordinary citizen, I have been following the case quite closely and it’s a joke to see Saiful swearing on the Quran to say that what he is actually telling is the truth. Come on Saiful.. if by just swearing, you think the rakyat will believe you are telling the truth?
To me…Saiful is not telling the truth when he was asked why he did the swearing on the eve of the Permatang Pauh nomination day when DSAI is a candidate. He answered by saying he is not aware whether DSAI is contesting and say it is co-incidental. In his blog many days earlier he wish DSAI good luck in the by election.
Saiful…when did you ever tell the truth? Hope God forgive you.
Reply
This is a water-shed election.
The main beneficiary is Malaysian democracy.
That the BN Regime has to go is an undeniable fact. We are all fed-up with the corruption that is so pervasive. We are also fed-up with the mismanagement and the leadership by auto-pilot. BN is a populated by criminals.
Only way to clean house is a new broom. Love him or hate him, Anwar is this new broom.
Reply
Those who had advised, presided and encouraged the swearing on the Mushaf of the al Quran including the Imam of the Masjid Wilayah, Director of Jawi and other Mosque Officials and the Father and Family of Saiful Bukahri Azlan should be cited for Contempt of the Federal Territory Syariah Courts, and the Yang DiPertuan Agong being the Head of the Islamic Affairs.
The case in still pending in the Syariah Courts of the Federal Territory and their acts tantamount to a serious breach of laws of Syariah Courts.
Their acts have cause irreparable damage to the dignity and santimony of the Syariah Courts.
They deserve to be prosecuted.
Reply
The horse done bolt DSAI. UMNO has been making a mockery of the Quran Muslims and Islam for the past 12 years now. One can’t be naive any more. We have to be strict with these violators and the is enough room and a bold mandate for reversing this obnoxious trend in behaviour. AA Bababi shouldn’t be exonerated when the hour of self examination review and most likely legal accountability. These imbeciles must be brought to account. We are behind you 100% and let us not be persuade by mercy or compassion. These people have injured us grievously as a nation. It is stunning as to how such sickness is at the helm. Even Russia have been brought low, let us take cue from both Russia and China though not perfect; they are emerging nations of what a strong nation the will be. many of these buggers in UMNO are searching avenues for shifting Malaysian funds overseas.
Reply
all those muslim criminals should rush to the nearest mosque and take an oath! then they are not quity and should be set free!!! brilliant idea to help to cease the burden of the judges.
Reply
Cek Det yg tak berhenti smayang asar dlm pembentangan belanjawan pun suruh Anuar sumpah . Apa dia ingat sumpah macam proses bail out anak dia ka…pi jalan da..muka tak malu..Dia seorang doktor sepatutnya kena terima laporan doktor yg mengesahkan tak ada kesan uk..uk kat budak saiful tu..pangkat saja orang tua..tapi..
pada cek det..awat hg tak suruh doktor tu yg angkat sumpah yg mengatakan saiful tak kena uk..uk..ee..akai tak dak
Reply
Praise God the Almighty he answered prayers that no harm would come to DSAI on nomination day. May he continue to stretch out his mighty hand of protection against all evil forces surrounding DSAI and bring him to a landslide victory on 26th August 2008. God bless you and your family.
Reply
Dear DSAI,
The oath taken by Saiful was very a political motive because the allegation was baseless.They hope by swearing, could able to gain peoples trust to believe the sodomy.Their target are of course the old folk Malays whose only get the news through the mainstream media.So, you’ve got to do something to counter them.If not, your performance in this by-election will be affected.Please discuss with your team on the next move.Don’t take the Saiful’s oath lightly.
Reply
Many people swore in court to tell the truth and nothing but the truth, yet many told lies in court.
Also, assuming Raja Petra swore over the Quran that Rosmah was at the murder scene and Najib was romantically involve with a Mongolian woman, does that make Rosmah and Najib guilty of abetting murder?
Malaysia needed a clean, fair and just govt. I have always wonder why it is so difficult to give that to the rakyat.
Reply
The two leaders Abdullah and Najib, instead of projecting to the citizens of Malaysia to have confidence and rely on the justice systems, they apparently for their political motives, encouraged the rakyat to swear on the Quran. If swearing on the Quran supersede the charge made on Anwar, we no longer need the courts of this land. I am a non-muslim, I do not claim I have great knowledge on Islam. I respect the Islam religion and felt making this practice of swearing so lightly, simply making a mockery of Islam. I leave this to the authority of Islam to enlighten we (non-muslims) the gravity of this serious act.
Reply
WHEN A PERSON CAN LIE FOR MONEY, WHAT IS THERE TO SWEAR UPON THE AL QURAN.
IT DOES NOT MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE.BECAUSE HE IS A LAIR, BUT PLEASE DONT MAKE A MOCKERY FOR USING THE AL-QURAN, THAT IS THE MOST SINFUL THING TO DO. NOWHERE THIS RELIGION SAY SO.MOST OF OUR ULAMAK DISAGREE, MAY ONLY THIS NEW RELIGION “ISLAM HADARI” THOUGHT SO.
Reply
Swearing on the Quran is nothing but an act of desperation by Saiful who is so bankcrupt of idea on how to make people believe in him so to please his political masters the corrupt and incompetent BN-UMNO regime. Saiful has to make the wealth promised to him by the BN-UMNO regime worth the while.
Human scums like Saiful is not interested that by doing such stupid act, he has made a mockery of the Quran and God. He has made a mockery of the Muslims. Swearing on the Quran is not an Islamic practise. You see, the enemies of the Muslims are actually the Muslim themselves. So it is with Saiful and his BN-UMNO regime.
Pas Muslim leaders have commented on such act being stupid. What about comments and fatuah from other Muslim bodies etc Syariah Court, the big imams of the various mosques, Jais etc. What are you people quite? Please say something and show some sense of responsibility and don’t be afraid of your BN-UMNO masters as Allah is more powerful than these scums!!!!
By the way I am a Muslim.
Reply
Next time suruh orang yang nak sumpah depan Quran tu mengaji dulu. Then baru ada credibility yang orang yang nak bersumpah tu menghormati dan menyanjungi kitab suci yang diturunkan oleh Allah. SO tak der lah dia pegang Quran macam pegang Dictionary.
Opening si Saiful pun ustaz kena betulkan. Dia ni tak boleh baca QUran kot……..Kesian kat dia….demi duit..demi nak jadik juruterbang, terpaksa memalukan diri depan khalayak ramai pun tak apa.
Aku rasa ada ‘dalang’ yang psycho budak ni sampaikan dia percaya yang perbuatan dia dapat menyelamatkan bangsa, agama, negara dari DSAI dengan membuat pengakuan helah ini. Cuba perhatikan betul-betul muka dia masa sumpah….macam orang kena pukau. Military is very goo d at this kind of thing!
Reply
Salam,
I can only said one thing to “Malaysian living abroad”….spot on!!!
Reply
Being a follower of a faith does not give the person the right to do what one likes, as in this case, Saiful and his swearing on the Qu’ran. All those having immense knowledge on Islam and its principles and discipline disagreed with Saiful’s act. In fact they state it as an unacceptable and despicable act, hurting all practising muslims. From this one can say that non muslims are actually not the enemies of Islam. I should say that the enemies of a religion is within the religious practiioners themselves when they go against the discipline and accepted values of that religion, and use it as a tool for political mileage. This misuse and abuse of religion is actually sinning, sacrificing and mocking one’s own religion for the sake of power, greed and recognition.
Reply
When one is ignorant of a religion and its practices, it is not sinful if one unknowingly does things against that said religion. In other words when a Muslim unknowingly says or does something against the principles or discipline of Buddhism, or Hinduism, or even Christianity, he can be forgiven by virtue of the fact that he is ignorant. But on the other hand, when a Muslim knowingly does anything against his own religion, HE IS ACCOUNTABLE TO THE OTHERS WHO ARE PRACTISING ISLAM!!!!!!
Reply
Each of us have to respect the religion we practise. We have to consider others within that religion as well. We have to consider the sensitivities surrounding religions and as far as possible not hurt each other, whatever our religions maybe. May all religions, customs, traditional practices etc…. flourish under the able leadership of our beloved DSAI and PR. We honour PAS, DAP, PKR and hope the future of Malaysia be the envy of the world and the emergence of a Maiaysian race becomes a reality under our future PM, DSAI. May his wisdom and the wisdom of those with him flourish with the rising sun each day.
Reply
Saya sokong SAMARKAND…. memang betul BODOH lagi DUNGU si SYAI-FOOL, NAJIP, Kambing Jahil (KJ), dan lain2 yang seangkatan dengannya… Al-Quran tidak boleh dipermainkan sebegitu rupa.. ni islam ape nie, islam Hadhari Pak Lah ker… Islam UMNO? sejak bila UMNO memperjuangkan ISLAM? betul ke UMNO memperjuangkan Melayu?semua tanah dia kebas, ini tanah lombong tempat aku mancing pun diorg kebas… buat pembangunan konon (jual lot banglo, 1 lot 1 juta)… kepala hotak dia… pastu taruk bilik gerakan UMNO kat pintu masuk tempat tu… Ini ker membela nasib rakyat… rumah exco, banglo besar punyerla class siap ade swimming pool, rakyat rata2 mampu dok flet jeks.. bangga ker korang jadi rakyat malaysia?? buat mase sekarang aku x bangga langsung, andaikata UMNO terus memerintah, aku tekad nk keluar dari negara yang banyak masalah ni…
“.Segeralah WAHAI RAKYAT MALAYSIA SEDAR.. jangan sampai BALA dari Si SYAI-FOOL tu melanda seluruh MALAYSIA. Silap-silap Allah Taala boleh turunkan bala seperti Tsunami ke,Gempa Bumi ke. Allah tidak akan menurunkan Bala kepada dia seorang,kemungkinan?????? Jangan main-main…” from SAMARKAND
Reply
helo moleleter
apa pasat ada senser………lu botot2 banyak bodoh punya olang tak da baca punya olang…he he he
haiyaaaaaaaaa apa lu semua olang cakap sini cakap sana, tak da habis. botot2 bikin gua lagi pusing
ini sikit punya pasal sulah jadi botot2 bosat…….he he he
hey anuar……..apa pasat lu tak mahu angkat sumpah !! lu botot2 kasi semua olang banyak susah.
lu mesti kasi tahu sama dia olang, sekalang lu mau jadi gentleman…..mau pegi angkat sumpah.
itu macam bikin baru babut……….cerita pun boleh habis….haiya
Reply
kenapa tak pernah pikir tentang bala..bala tak datang pada sorang je tapi pada semua.
Reply
ok
Reply
sallam
Reply