16
Apr
07

Isu Gerakan: Fikir Implikasi Sebelum Buat Sanggahan

Najib1976 menanyakan:

Saudara Anwar. Apa pandangan saudara berkaitan Parti Gerakan ….suka suka mereka suruh Mufti Perak letak jawatan. Apa ia ingat Mufti tu dia yang lantik ? Kemudian mereka cadangkan pulak mahkamah khas untuk mengendalikan kes berkaitan agama….boleh saudara luangkan masa utk memberi pandangan dan pendapat ?

Najib1976
Gerakan menafikan dan pemimpin berkenaan memohon maaf. Pengajaran dari episod tersebut ialah bahawa kenyataan angkuh dan gopoh tidak akan membantu. Mufti Perak disegani ramai dan dianggap berwibawa. Sebarang sanggahan sekiranya wajar perlu dilakukan secara sopan.


2 Responses to “Isu Gerakan: Fikir Implikasi Sebelum Buat Sanggahan”


  1. 1 aput83 Apr 17th, 2007 at 11:10 am

    Sorry, Dato’ Seri, but I disagree with you on the fact that I personally am affronted with this mufti for a couple of reasons.

    1. He asked that people with AIDS be quarantined in a placement, like that of our smallpox community. Just to point out, Dato’ Seri, AIDS is not as contagious as smallpox, as I’m sure you know, and is not a health threat.

    2. Secondly, he was responsible for spreading an SMS which stated that a church in Perak was about to baptise Muslims, with Dato Azhar Mansor leading the ceremony. He received the SMS from another woman, but he did not check the details and forwarded it anyway.

    3. He was against the racial integrated celebration of Deepavali, along with the Religious Advisor in Bank Islam. Before that, he stated that Muslims should also avoid taking part in Chinese New Year celebrations as well.

    I am continually disgusted to know that there are people who support this bigot, especially in this time where racial unity is under threat and religion has become such a taboo topic that nobody cares to even venture into an inter-faith discussion to better understand one another.

    Reply

  2. 2 aput83 Apr 17th, 2007 at 11:14 am

    Also, the PKR is in favor of a Constitutional Court to deal with issues affecting the persons civic and religious law. Which one should be put first?

    Are we a country that puts civil law over religious? Or otherwise?

    Reply

Leave a Reply




fish_curry: RT @tengkusani: Ini pun PKR nak tipu rakyat? Misleading fact! Fitnah PKR RT @tianchua: 2 Sept04 @anwaribrahim bebas setelah 7thn dipe ... http://tmi.me/YwvQ
29 minutes ago
fery_wk: Subhanalloh Pak @anwaribrahim tahu Asgar (asli Garut), salam takzim Dato :-) RT @anwaribrahim: Asgar:kenang asli garo ... http://tmi.me/Yz1L
34 minutes ago
isnaeni13: Garut, bukan Garot pakcik. RT @anwaribrahim: Asgar:kenang asli garot @GorisMustaqim: Insya.. nanti dicipratin pas... http://mtw.tl/lx2uur
37 minutes ago
imanusman: @anwaribrahim @GorisMustaqim dan saya ikutan di mention pula oleh pak Anwar. Terima kasih. Kang Goris hebat pisan euy!
41 minutes ago
philyong: @anwaribrahim tidur awal YB! the rakyat needs you!
41 minutes ago

Galeri Flickr

IMG_3509 IMG_3620 IMG_3549 IMG_3624 IMG_3552 1 (1) 6 (3) 6 (2) 

Pamerkan Di Website Anda

Other Banners

 

April 2007
M T W T F S S
« Mar   May »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30