<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nik Nazmi: Rumah Terbuka dan Ulasan Sengketa Politik di Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anwaribrahimblog.com/2006/10/29/nik-nazmi-rumah-terbuka-dan-ulasan-sengketa-politik-di-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anwaribrahimblog.com/2006/10/29/nik-nazmi-rumah-terbuka-dan-ulasan-sengketa-politik-di-media/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 15:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: freepress</title>
		<link>http://anwaribrahimblog.com/2006/10/29/nik-nazmi-rumah-terbuka-dan-ulasan-sengketa-politik-di-media/#comment-710</link>
		<dc:creator>freepress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 03:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anwaribrahimblog.com/?p=266#comment-710</guid>
		<description>Assalamualaikum Datuk Seri Anwar. Perhaps it is about time that your goodself, as a former Deputy Prime Minister, be able to shed some light on the current turn of events and providing us an intellectual insight of the controversies surrounding Dr Mahathir and Datuk Seri Abdullah. Firstly, what makes Dr Mahathir voiced his displeasure. Secondly, why the current Administration failed to look into the finer aspects of the arguments as put forward by Dr Mahathir? Thirdly, can Datuk Seri Anwar gave us a glimpse of the thinking and values uphold by Dr Mahathir, being someone whom to me is an authoritarian and a realist? I really appreciate if you provide us the answers to these questions which to my humble opinion, is very much needed in understanding the current dynamics of Malaysian politics. Salam Ukhuwah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Assalamualaikum Datuk Seri Anwar. Perhaps it is about time that your goodself, as a former Deputy Prime Minister, be able to shed some light on the current turn of events and providing us an intellectual insight of the controversies surrounding Dr Mahathir and Datuk Seri Abdullah. Firstly, what makes Dr Mahathir voiced his displeasure. Secondly, why the current Administration failed to look into the finer aspects of the arguments as put forward by Dr Mahathir? Thirdly, can Datuk Seri Anwar gave us a glimpse of the thinking and values uphold by Dr Mahathir, being someone whom to me is an authoritarian and a realist? I really appreciate if you provide us the answers to these questions which to my humble opinion, is very much needed in understanding the current dynamics of Malaysian politics. Salam Ukhuwah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eltonjohn</title>
		<link>http://anwaribrahimblog.com/2006/10/29/nik-nazmi-rumah-terbuka-dan-ulasan-sengketa-politik-di-media/#comment-709</link>
		<dc:creator>eltonjohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 01:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anwaribrahimblog.com/?p=266#comment-709</guid>
		<description>i was there.it was a wonderful open house.i c old friends,made new friends and most of all,berhari raya
with DSAI and kak Wan.

Kadir Jasin asks if DSAI berdendam(dendam kesumat or
dendam berahi)and he says no such thing.Mahathir wanted
to stay relevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was there.it was a wonderful open house.i c old friends,made new friends and most of all,berhari raya<br />
with DSAI and kak Wan.</p>
<p>Kadir Jasin asks if DSAI berdendam(dendam kesumat or<br />
dendam berahi)and he says no such thing.Mahathir wanted<br />
to stay relevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
